"Lock her Up"

Islam Sucks said:
Really?

Since you CLAIM you aren't a Hillary supporter, here is your chance to prove it. Start a thread and give us that "reasoned way"

Or are you scared of what the board lefties might do? Afraid of incurring Cunt Darculas wrath?
Click to expand...

LOL

Like all of those anti-Trump threads you've started, Trump lover?

I've posted about my issues with Hillary. There isn't a scale that can measure how little I care about "proving" myself to a Trump-loving partisan hack like you.
 
Islam Sucks said:
Looks like Lock Her Up has gotten people to forget about Malania's speech. Didn't take long
Click to expand...

Translation: Please go away, plagiarism story. I love Trump and it makes me sad.

I just went to cnn.com and saw the banner headline: "Bigger Than Plagiarism," with a story about what it says about the campaign as a whole. And there is a "breaking news" header about more denial from the campaign.

Still goin' strong.
 
And holy shite, are you mad-obsessed w/ Darla. What's up w/ that, anyway? Secret crush?

Reminds me so much of dudes in elementary school who would constantly trash certain girls for fear of "cooties" & all that.
 
Thing1 said:
And holy shite, are you mad-obsessed w/ Darla. What's up w/ that, anyway? Secret crush?

Reminds me so much of dudes in elementary school who would constantly trash certain girls for fear of "cooties" & all that.
Click to expand...

The answer is all in my signature Onceler, and I live up to my advertising. :)
 
Thing1 said:
Translation: Please go away, plagiarism story. I love Trump and it makes me sad.

I just went to cnn.com and saw the banner headline: "Bigger Than Plagiarism," with a story about what it says about the campaign as a whole. And there is a "breaking news" header about more denial from the campaign.

Still goin' strong.
Click to expand...


That story is already heading to the back burner. I know how much you wish it weren't so, but it is.
 
Thing1 said:
And holy shite, are you mad-obsessed w/ Darla. What's up w/ that, anyway? Secret crush?

Reminds me so much of dudes in elementary school who would constantly trash certain girls for fear of "cooties" & all that.
Click to expand...

did you miss her epic meltdown this morning? I guess you will just ignore it? I don't blame you. You don't want to get on her Darcula side. She isn't wearing her period panties this morning and messed up her brand new pants suit
 
Althea said:
It's a conundrum. He isn't a Right Wing supporter on most issues. Truth be told, BAC took him under his wing years ago, and for some reason Anatta lapped up all the drivel about Libya.

He does indeed claim ownership to scores of threads on multiple message boards, spouting the same fabrications re. Libya.

As soon as anyone mentions the word, his ears go up in Pavlovian fashion, and he froths.

He spent absolutely no time fact checking Christie.....(bridge, what bridge?) and rushed here like a dog with a bone.

Sure...this country learned the hard way about 'Arab Spring' not being a viable pipe dream. Hopefully, we've learned a thing or two about leaving heinous dictators in power in order to keep some semblance of order in the region.

A few uncomfortable facts for Hillary haters.
Click to expand...
Don't drag BAC into this - your feud wth him over BLM isn't my concern .

The link you showed goes to French motivation -if you had bothered to check Clinton's Blumenthal Emails it also showed Sarkozy
was upset at Qadaffi's Pan-Africanism specifically his replacing the French franc with Libya's gold dinar.
Funny you choose a websight that doesn't mention that part. It was a direct assault on France's African neo-colonialism

It has nothing to do with "Pavlovian Hillary haters" - Hillary words and actions damn herself.
You guys can't handle the fact you are backing a corrupt, arrogance of power, LYING, failure as a sec of state.
and when she's called out on it - it makes you uncomfortable..so sorry -but she is what she is.

As to the "taking under his wing" BAC returned to DCJ after his absence and questioned my thesis that Hilary was the driving force and
international organizer for the demise of Libya , post 2011-NATO's war.

I showed him some references that were then topical -and also logged in under my blog/thread.
It took him about 15 minutes to agree Hillary was the main cause of the international organizing-
and driving force behind NATO's backing the "no fly" that changed into full scale regime change
( to spell that out -it means going after Qaddafi's land forces directly in the civil war -not just his AF).

BAC is intellectually honest - and willing to see Libya for what it was. Bloodthirsty NATO being led around by Clinton's international organizing.
I'll give you 3 main sources next post that back all this up. 2 from the NYTimes, and 1 from her own state dept.
Read them before you come around with all this was due to the French.
To be specific Hillary bought into the NTC's promises of a "democratic Libya" (Jibril in Paris).
Clinton still clings to that meme in the debates with Bernie -you would have known that if you paid attention-
no research involved- she still blames the Libyans for not accepting US help on the ground.
Libya's NTC wanted no part of the US once it gained power -and we were never going to referee the militias on the ground anyways.
It was another Clinton...fabrication.

You came with that same tired meme "blood for oil" at DCJ and I shot it down easily.
from your link- which I suppose is your thesis here:
Clinton was aware of everything the French were up to and apparently had little objection to the cold-blooded cynicism behind Paris’s policies in the region.
Click to expand...
Sure she knew about the French motivation - but that doesn'tmean she didn't have her own motivation -it was her neocon "building Libyan democracy at the barrel of a gun"

Althea said:
Sure...this country learned the hard way about 'Arab Spring' not being a viable pipe dream. Hopefully, we've learned a thing or two about leaving heinous dictators in power in order to keep some semblance of order in the region.
Click to expand...
Clinton didn't learn a damn thing. Not from Iraq, and not from Libya or Syria -she still defends Libya with her use of "smart power"
She still want a US enforced "no fly" in Syria.
Do your research before you come at me with 1/2 baked ideas. Hillary is an unrepentant warhawk
 
Althea said:
It's a conundrum. He isn't a Right Wing supporter on most issues. Truth be told, BAC took him under his wing years ago, and for some reason Anatta lapped up all the drivel about Libya.

He does indeed claim ownership to scores of threads on multiple message boards, spouting the same fabrications re. Libya.

As soon as anyone mentions the word, his ears go up in Pavlovian fashion, and he froths.
Click to expand...
more horseshit. I keep 1 thread blog on DCJ - "ownership"? It's a blog-sourced from all over the world.

Interviews, reportage, analysis -news coverage. I don't own anything, but a few comments in there.
It's meant as documentation of Libya starting with the Tripoli airport battle that threw out the NTC from power.
I didn't even cover the PM kidnapping -although I think I got Gen Hiftar's shelling of Parliament in there from Google cached
after DCJ#1 was shut down.
Your characterizations again are off base.

Here are 3 sources you need to study up on to at least be fluent on Libya: 2 from the NYTimes and 1 from her own State dept.
Get back to me once you have done the research. These are solid sources.
++

Hillary Clinton,
‘Smart Power’
and a
Dictator’s Fall

The president was wary. The
secretary of state was persuasive.
But the ouster of Col. Muammar
el-Qaddafi left Libya a failed
state and a terrorist haven.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html

A New Libya,
With ‘Very
Little Time Left’

The fall of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi
seemed to vindicate Hillary Clinton.
Then militias refused to disarm,
neighbors fanned a civil war, and
the Islamic State found refuge
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/libya-isis-hillary-clinton.html

From: Jake Sullivan
Sant: Sunday, August 21, 2011 7:40 PM
To: Mills, Cheryl D; Nuiand, Victoria J
Subject: tidc todc on Libya

it shows S'Clinton leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country's libya policy from start to finish.

HRC has been a critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group
meetings — as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya. She was instrumental in securing the
authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime.
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRC_Email_1_296/HRCH1/DOC_0C05739752/C05739752.pdf
 
anatta said:
Don't drag BAC into this - your feud wth him over BLM isn't my concern .

The link you showed goes to French motivation -if you had bothered to check Clinton's Blumenthal Emails it also showed Sarkozy
was upset at Qadaffi's Pan-Africanism specifically his replacing the French franc with Libya's gold dinar.
Funny you choose a websight that doesn't mention that part. It was a direct assault on France's African neo-colonialism

It has nothing to do with "Pavlovian Hillary haters" - Hillary words and actions damn herself.
You guys can't handle the fact you are backing a corrupt, arrogance of power, LYING, failure as a sec of state.
and when she's called out on it - it makes you uncomfortable..so sorry -but she is what she is.

As to the "taking under his wing" BAC returned to DCJ after his absence and questioned my thesis that Hilary was the driving force and
international organizer for the demise of Libya , post 2011-NATO's war.

I showed him some references that were then topical -and also logged in under my blog/thread.
It took him about 15 minutes to agree Hillary was the main cause of the international organizing-
and driving force behind NATO's backing the "no fly" that changed into full scale regime change
( to spell that out -it means going after Qaddafi's land forces directly in the civil war -not just his AF).

BAC is intellectually honest - and willing to see Libya for what it was. Bloodthirsty NATO being led around by Clinton's international organizing.
I'll give you 3 main sources next post that back all this up. 2 from the NYTimes, and 1 from her own state dept.
Read them before you come around with all this was due to the French.
To be specific Hillary bought into the NTC's promises of a "democratic Libya" (Jibril in Paris).
Clinton still clings to that meme in the debates with Bernie -you would have known that if you paid attention-
no research involved- she still blames the Libyans for not accepting US help on the ground.
Libya's NTC wanted no part of the US once it gained power -and we were never going to referee the militias on the ground anyways.
It was another Clinton...fabrication.

You came with that same tired meme "blood for oil" at DCJ and I shot it down easily.
from your link- which I suppose is your thesis here:
Sure she knew about the French motivation - but that doesn'tmean she didn't have her own motivation -it was her neocon "building Libyan democracy at the barrel of a gun"


Clinton didn't learn a damn thing. Not from Iraq, and not from Libya or Syria -she still defends Libya with her use of "smart power"
She still want a US enforced "no fly" in Syria.
Do your research before you come at me with 1/2 baked ideas. Hillary is an unrepentant warhawk
Click to expand...
Go back to your second post in this thread, where you gobble up Christie's bogus claims like a dog gobbles shit from a cat litter box.


Pay special attention the your bolded nonsense about 'Hillary being the chief architect blah blah blah.

My link was to show you that other nations were as flawed in their gluttonous desire for Libya's oil.
 
Darla said:
I know a lot of the Libya stuff was started by BAC. Sad.
Click to expand...
you and John are clueless on Libya.
You don't know a damn thing-neither of you - because neither of you do any research. Althea does at least a cursory look over.
But he could do more - he's a member of DCJ, and the Libyan Civil War 2014-Present (<-- link) easily covers the basics, as well as more detailed events.
 
anatta said:
more horseshit. I keep 1 thread blog on DCJ - "ownership"? It's a blog-sourced from all over the world.

Interviews, reportage, analysis -news coverage. I don't own anything, but a few comments in there.
It's meant as documentation of Libya starting with the Tripoli airport battle that threw out the NTC from power.
I didn't even cover the PM kidnapping -although I think I got Gen Hiftar's shelling of Parliament in there from Google cached
after DCJ#1 was shut down.
Your characterizations again are off base.

Here are 3 sources you need to study up on to at least be fluent on Libya: 2 from the NYTimes and 1 from her own State dept.
Get back to me once you have done the research. These are solid sources.
++

Hillary Clinton,
‘Smart Power’
and a
Dictator’s Fall

The president was wary. The
secretary of state was persuasive.
But the ouster of Col. Muammar
el-Qaddafi left Libya a failed
state and a terrorist haven.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html
Click to expand...

2nd paragraph from this link


In the throes of the Arab Spring, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi was facing a furious revolt by Libyans determined to end his quixotic 42-year rule. The dictator’s forces were approaching Benghazi, the crucible of the rebellion, and threatening a blood bath. France and Britain were urging the United States to join them in a military campaign to halt Colonel Qaddafi’s troops, and now the Arab League, too, was calling for action.



Still wanna go with that 'chief architect' bullshit? BAC would be proud of you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top