Lock her up!

d1nguron0tx71.png

Photo by Brandon :laugh:

efa.jpg
 
Well, I will say this: Durham has found more people involved in Russian collusion to date than Mueller--and then Schiff--did in his entire investigation...

Actually, it looks like (maybe) Durham isn't the "damp squibb" that everyone thought he was ? I mean, he's nailed a couple of major Democrat rats here and turned a big spot-light on "crooked" Hillary Clinton re Russiagate/Steele/Mueller etc.. With a Democrat administration in power that must have taken some guts ? Remember how Obama's Democrat "Deep State" (FBI, CIA, DNI, NSA, DOJ etc) were weaponized and unleashed to attack Trump throughout the first 3 years of his Presidency ? They went for him like a pack of vicious Pit - Bull Terriers, 24/7, from every direction.



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Well, I will say this: Durham has found more people involved in Russian collusion to date than Mueller--and then Schiff--did in his entire investigation...

The Clinton team put together the Russia narrative within 24 hours of her defeat.

The Clinton account explained that Russian hacking and election meddling caused her unexpected loss.

Her opponent, Donald Trump, was a puppet of Putin. Trump, they said, “encourages espionage against our people.”

The scurrilous Trump dossier, prepared by a London opposition research firm, Orbis, and paid for by DEMOCRATS, formed a key part of the Clinton narrative: "Trump’s escapades in Russia had made him a hostage of the Kremlin, ready to do its bidding".

That was Hillary's way to say that Trump is really not President of the United States—a siren call adopted by the DEMOCRAT party and media.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2017/06/19/is-russiagate-really-hillarygate/#2e56effa5cf6
 
The Clinton team put together the Russia narrative within 24 hours of her defeat.

That would be November 2016, right?

In July 2016 the FBI began investigating the Russian government’s attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election, including whether President Donald Trump’s campaign associates were involved in those efforts.
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/t...ign associates were involved in those efforts

The scurrilous Trump dossier, prepared by a London opposition research firm, Orbis, and paid for by Democrats, formed a key part of the Clinton narrative.
That was Hillary's way to say that Trump is really not President of the United States.

In October 2015 Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. In April 2016 an attorney for the DNC hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while the Free Beacon stopped its backing. In June 2016 Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel...rior to and during the 2016 election campaign.


Don't like to bother you guys with facts ...
 
That would be November 2016, right?

Right.

Therefore;

The Clinton team put together the Russia narrative within 24 hours of her defeat.

The Clinton account explained that Russian hacking and election meddling caused her unexpected loss.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2017/06/19/is-russiagate-really-hillarygate/#2e56effa5cf6

You see, the "insurance policy" AKA "dossier" message was only trotted out by her corrupt campaign as an excuse for the Hildebeast's unexpected loss after the fact because she was supposed to win.

Maybe you should research what an insurance policy is for.

If you need any further cognitive assistance, don't hesitate to ask.
 
You see, the "insurance policy" AKA "dossier" message was only trotted out by her corrupt campaign as an excuse for the Hildebeast's unexpected loss after the fact because she was supposed to win.

I see! So how did her corrupt campaign get the FBI to start investigating this four months previously?

Seems like a lot of work for the unlikely event that Hillary lost to Dear ex-Leader. But that's the insurance business, I guess.
 
Seems like a lot of work for the unlikely event that Hillary lost to Dear ex-Leader. But that's the insurance business, I guess.

It is, indeed.

"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office - that there's no way he [Trump] gets elected – but I'm afraid we can't take that risk," writes FBI counterintelligence officer Peter Strzok to FBI lawyer Lisa Page, with whom he was having an extramarital affair while spearheading both the Clinton email inquiry and the early Trump-Russia probe, adding, "It's like a life insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40" (March 4, 2016).
 
Back
Top