LIVE STREAM: Women's March On Washington DC 1/21/17

Queen Snowflake said:
lol, my remarks aren't childish and they are logical. Women have been energized by this march, hide and watch. By the way, there were conservative women there too, they stood in solidarity with liberal women voicing unity on many of the issues. There will be Republican women who run, too, but they are conservative women who support women's issues. My friends who attended rallies all over the US are encouraged how women are coming together.
Click to expand...
Your remarks are childish, as usual, and they are not logical, but rather emotional in nature. The "march" didn't energize these women, their illogical fears of one man becoming President and "rolling back 'rights'" energized them to attend this "march" in the first place, based mainly on lies propagated by the media and how easily these women are manipulated by Liberal media/social media talking points.

Any politically-conservative women who came out to these gatherings likely did so to contrast with the often vulgar and illogical messages put out there by the Liberal women and men. And as you know, the pro-life women were shunned by this "march". Nothing says "unity" of women like shunning a large segment of those women... Such a farce!
 
christiefan915 said:
"...several hundred females into local positions around the country..." :rofl2:

Is it against your principles to call women WOMEN and not females, and are we supposed to thank you that some got LOCAL positions?
Click to expand...
Huh? I have used the terms "female" and "women" interchangeably multiple times, so I don't know what ridiculous point you think you're making. Wikipedia calls women in political offices "female"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_governors_in_the_United_States

There are more female Republican governors than Democratic. The two Democratic women are governors of Rhode Island (the smallest state in the U.S.), and Oregon, where she originally became that way because the male governor resigned under scandal. In any case, most of these women are elected after serving first in local positions, and rising up the ranks. For you to mock that, just illustrates your complete lack of knowledge and historical fact...
 
blacknwhite321 said:
Your remarks are childish, as usual, and they are not logical, but rather emotional in nature. The "march" didn't energize these women, their illogical fears of one man becoming President and "rolling back 'rights'" energized them to attend this "march" in the first place, based mainly on lies propagated by the media and how easily these women are manipulated by Liberal media/social media talking points.

Any politically-conservative women who came out to these gatherings likely did so to contrast with the often vulgar and illogical messages put out there by the Liberal women and men. And as you know, the pro-life women were shunned by this "march". Nothing says "unity" of women like shunning a large segment of those women... Such a farce!
Click to expand...

You think the anti-choice march on January 27 wants pro-choice people in their event, holding signs saying "Keep abortion legal"? Give me a break.

The march was organized starting November 9, specifically to push back at trump and his supporters because of his rhetoric against women. It would never have happened had trump shown a shred of decency toward women, especially those who defied him. Obviously you haven't looked at the website of the march where they clearly lay out their mission statement and principles.

Call the wa-a-a-ambulance for those poor anti-choice women who didn't have the sense of a fruit fly to understand what this march was about.
 
blacknwhite321 said:
Huh? I have used the terms "female" and "women" interchangeably multiple times, so I don't know what ridiculous point you think you're making. Wikipedia calls women in political offices "female"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_governors_in_the_United_States

There are more female Republican governors than Democratic. The two Democratic women are governors of Rhode Island (the smallest state in the U.S.), and Oregon, where she originally became that way because the male governor resigned under scandal. In any case, most of these women are elected after serving first in local positions, and rising up the ranks. For you to mock that, just illustrates your complete lack of knowledge and historical fact...
Click to expand...

Oh, I have knowledge and understand history. Maybe you should brush up on your writing skills.
 
blacknwhite321 said:
Your remarks are childish, as usual, and they are not logical, but rather emotional in nature. The "march" didn't energize these women, their illogical fears of one man becoming President and "rolling back 'rights'" energized them to attend this "march" in the first place, based mainly on lies propagated by the media and how easily these women are manipulated by Liberal media/social media talking points.

Any politically-conservative women who came out to these gatherings likely did so to contrast with the often vulgar and illogical messages put out there by the Liberal women and men. And as you know, the pro-life women were shunned by this "march". Nothing says "unity" of women like shunning a large segment of those women... Such a farce!
Click to expand...
A lot of secret, coded language in this post, a man who fears women language. Boots booga, here we come!
 
christiefan915 said:
You think the anti-choice march on January 27 wants pro-choice people in their event, holding signs saying "Keep abortion legal"? Give me a break.

The march was organized starting November 9, specifically to push back at trump and his supporters because of his rhetoric against women. It would never have happened had trump shown a shred of decency toward women, especially those who defied him. Obviously you haven't looked at the website of the march where they clearly lay out their mission statement and principles.

Call the wa-a-a-ambulance for those poor anti-choice women who didn't have the sense of a fruit fly to understand what this march was about.
Click to expand...
What a ridiculously disingenuous and dishonest reply! First of all, the pro-life march is appropriately titled: "March for Life", it is NOT titled: "Women's March on Washington" or "Women's March" for short. The name itself is farce, because all women's point of views were not allowed!

Trump didn't have any "rhetoric against women", he had rhetoric against ONE of his political opponents who is a career criminal, who happens to be a woman. These indoctrinated and ignorant fools gathering yesterday don't have a clue about reality, and it's pretty clear that it's just an emotional display of "We didn't get the American President we wanted", thus Michael Moore and Van Jones speaking, and Hollywood celebs who can't even bear children anymore even if they wanted to keep them instead of killing them. Their mission statement is based on fears and lies propagated by the media, and their consistent left-wing agenda which the electorate rejected in the 2016 election.
 
Next week they will be on a Greenpeace march complaining about the environment!!

abf7ad0408bc5a0ed301f6800bb55601.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
christiefan915 said:
Oh, I have knowledge and understand history. Maybe you should brush up on your writing skills.
Click to expand...
You have neither reading comprehension or common sense. If you did, you would not be mocking females being elected to local offices, as that is where many now prominent female politicians got their start. Republican women, as I stated before, will gain experience in their local positions, and rise through the ranks much faster and more successfully than of these ignorant and illogical Liberal women who "marched" yesterday.
 
Queen Snowflake said:
A lot of secret, coded language in this post, a man who fears women language. Boots booga, here we come!
Click to expand...
You hate life, goodness, truth, and your Creator. There was no coded language anywhere in my post. If I fear anything it's ignorance and lies spreading, whether that be via Obama, Michael Moore, Van Jones, or the mainstream press.
 
blacknwhite321 said:
You have neither reading comprehension or common sense. If you did, you would not be mocking females being elected to local offices, as that is where many now prominent female politicians got their start. Republican women, as I stated before, will gain experience in their local positions, and rise through the ranks much faster and more successfully than of these ignorant and illogical Liberal women who "marched" yesterday.
Click to expand...
This is the dear little condescending blackandwhite I have come to know and have always been amused by! His opinions he always states as if they are facts!
 
blacknwhite321 said:
You hate life, goodness, truth, and your Creator. There was no coded language anywhere in my post. If I fear anything it's ignorance and lies spreading, whether that be via Obama, Michael Moore, Van Jones, or the mainstream press.
Click to expand...
Lol, now who is the emotional one?
 
blacknwhite321 said:
What a ridiculously disingenuous and dishonest reply! First of all, the pro-life march is appropriately titled: "March for Life", it is NOT titled: "Women's March on Washington" or "Women's March" for short. The name itself is farce, because all women's point of views were not allowed!

Trump didn't have any "rhetoric against women", he had rhetoric against ONE of his political opponents who is a career criminal, who happens to be a woman. These indoctrinated and ignorant fools gathering yesterday don't have a clue about reality, and it's pretty clear that it's just an emotional display of "We didn't get the American President we wanted", thus Michael Moore and Van Jones speaking, and Hollywood celebs who can't even bear children anymore even if they wanted to keep them instead of killing them. Their mission statement is based on fears and lies propagated by the media, and their consistent left-wing agenda which the electorate rejected in the 2016 election.
Click to expand...

screw_ball.jpg

Rosie O'Donnell, Alicia Machado, Carly Fiorina, Megyn Kelly, Kristen Stewart, Arianna Huffington, Gail Collins, Sarah Jessica Parker, Bette Midler, Ghazala Khan, Katy Tur, Michelle Fields, Heidi Cruz, Elizabeth Warren, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mika Brzezinski, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Kim Kardashian, Natasha Stoynoff...

Need I go on?
 
blacknwhite321 said:
You have neither reading comprehension or common sense. If you did, you would not be mocking females being elected to local offices, as that is where many now prominent female politicians got their start. Republican women, as I stated before, will gain experience in their local positions, and rise through the ranks much faster and more successfully than of these ignorant and illogical Liberal women who "marched" yesterday.
Click to expand...

This is where your reading comprehension is lacking. I was mocking Y O U, not the women in office.
 
christiefan915 said:
screw_ball.jpg

Rosie O'Donnell, Alicia Machado, Carly Fiorina, Megyn Kelly, Kristen Stewart, Arianna Huffington, Gail Collins, Sarah Jessica Parker, Bette Midler, Ghazala Khan, Katy Tur, Michelle Fields, Heidi Cruz, Elizabeth Warren, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mika Brzezinski, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Kim Kardashian, Natasha Stoynoff...

Need I go on?
Click to expand...
Congratulations, you listed people's names :) Do you have a point you want to make?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top