Lindzen is not a climate scientist

Lindzen doesn’t subscribe to AGW; therefore, Lindzen is not a climatologist lol.

Dr. Lindzen accepts the elementary tenets of climate science. He agrees that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, calling people who dispute that point “nutty.” He agrees that the level of it is rising because of human activity and that this should warm the climate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/s...te-change-is-last-bastion-for-dissenters.html

Unlike you, he is not completely scientifically illiterate, and recognizes that human greenhouse gasses will warm the planet.
He just has some nutty theory that clouds will somehow save us from the more detrimental effects of global warming and climate change.
 
Unlike you, he is not completely scientifically illiterate, and recognizes that human greenhouse gasses will warm the planet.
He just has some nutty theory that clouds will somehow save us from the more detrimental effects of global warming and climate change.

Yeah, clouds play no part in climate. That would be nutty if they both blocked sunlight and trapped heat at night. Crazy stuff. That guy should be hung! Heretic!
 
In stark contrast to Lindzen's letter, ours was signed only by those who know something about the climate system," said Kerry Emanuel, an MIT professor of atmospheric sciences who signed the letter opposing Lindzen. Hirji, supra
 
In stark contrast to Lindzen's letter, ours was signed only by those who know something about the climate system," said Kerry Emanuel, an MIT professor of atmospheric sciences who signed the letter opposing Lindzen. Hirji, supra

He's not a climate scientist. He's merely a meteorologist. I thought only climate scientists' opinions were worthwhile? Why this shift in your standard?
 
Back
Top