"Lindsey Graham tells Donald Trump Jr. to ignore GOP subpoena"

what will this dickface say when they ORDER Clinton to testify and she says


If Orange Jr doesn't have to then neither do I?
 
what Gramm is calling for is for NO HUMAN will ever have to testify to congress ever again


but you Russians love that idea huh
 
Havana Moon said:
It's called politics ffs!!
Click to expand...

Ah, both Chairman are from the same political party

But we will give you a chance to back up what you say, if it is just politics, it should be easy for you to provide us an example of it happening in the recent past, a Senate Chairman advising an individual to ignore the requests of a fellow Senate Chairman, and from the same political party no less

I have a feeling that will be the last we see of "fogcatcher" on this thread
 
archives said:
Ah, both Chairman are from the same political party

But we will give you a chance to back up what you say, if it is just politics, it should be easy for you to provide us an example of it happening in the recent past, a Senate Chairman advising an individual to ignore the requests of a fellow Senate Chairman, and from the same political party no less

I have a feeling that will be the last we see of "fogcatcher" on this thread
Click to expand...

Why would Trump, Jr. comply. He has ALREADY TESTIFIED, EXTENSIVELY....
 
I actually would like to see him appear, but he goes in there with every word of the 20 or so hours of his little talk with mueller. Every question they ask, he goes to the transcript to give them exactly the same answer he gave mueller the first time, verbatim. If they start at 9am, I’ll bet they could be halfway through the 1st question by the time they quit for the day!
 
Grokmaster said:
Why would Trump, Jr. comply. He has ALREADY TESTIFIED, EXTENSIVELY....
Click to expand...

Well, no one would count his testifying in front of the House Committee as "extensive," remember when they let him refuse to answer cause a lawyer was sitting in the crowd and he claimed "attorney client privileges?" There goes half of his "EXTENSIVELY" testifying

And why did Comey, others, and Hillary have to reappear and reappear, the latter twice for over ten hours straight on live TV?

Trump's defense that Junior has already testified is lame at best
 
archives said:
Well, no one would count his testifying in front of the House Committee as "extensive," remember when they let him refuse to answer cause a lawyer was sitting in the crowd and he claimed "attorney client privileges?" There goes half of his "EXTENSIVELY" testifying

And why did Comey, others, and Hillary have to reappear and reappear, the latter twice for over ten hours straight on live TV?

Trump's defense that Junior has already testified is lame at best
Click to expand...

the republican party blatantly applies two differing sets of rules for the Democratic party members and their own republican party
 
archives said:
Well, no one would count his testifying in front of the House Committee as "extensive," remember when they let him refuse to answer cause a lawyer was sitting in the crowd and he claimed "attorney client privileges?" There goes half of his "EXTENSIVELY" testifying
Click to expand...

why do you think this time would be different?.........are you just setting yourself up for another disappointment?......
 
archives said:
Ah, both Chairman are from the same political party

But we will give you a chance to back up what you say, if it is just politics, it should be easy for you to provide us an example of it happening in the recent past, a Senate Chairman advising an individual to ignore the requests of a fellow Senate Chairman, and from the same political party no less

I have a feeling that will be the last we see of "fogcatcher" on this thread
Click to expand...

Don't know and care even less, it's just politics. Do you have some arsecheese to go with that whine?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top