TuTu Monroe
A Realist
Bullfrog, you have a severe case of paranoia.
Limpbaugh wants to own an NFL team :0) - Won't happen
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
Bullfrog, you have a severe case of paranoia.
C
Cancel5
Guest
How can one defend someone they have never listened to against gross misrepresentation?
How do they know what he represents?
Prakosh said sheri got cancer as her karma...is he disturbed too froggie?
C
Cancel5
Guest
I want Tutu to address this, if Prakosh were here, he could address it.
Always bringing up your boyfriends, sheesh!
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
act? how? suppress their speech....and who said rush represents anyone....he claims he represents no one....he is not elected...does oprah represent america....how about american idol...they have a larger audience....
Rush is far more than an entertainer, and I am speaking of support of such actions by those who aren't entertainers, and working to excuse it, are seen by people that we supposedly want to reach out to, to gain their votes on the basis of our color-blindness.
Instead we get people spending hours defending "Barack the Magic Negro" on message boards to exemplify who and what we are.
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll continue to act directly towards what we are supposedly proud of our party for, you can spend your time apologizing for what you try to dismiss as only an "entertainer" while you represent our party.
You represent our party, by being a vocal member of it. Supporting and excusing such over the line actions are what makes black people see our party as racist. Either take action and participate in what you want the party to be, or excuse these actions and give the other side more fodder. You control how others see our party, you and millions of others who are vocal members. All of us have to work to make the party what we envision to be the best, excusing this BS isn't it.
Your hyperbole is silly! He is an entertainer. That does not mean he does not have an agenda Damo, it's obvious he does and he's entitled to it.
No one defended the song they, me, defended his stated motives for playing it that you chose to misrepresent!
No, you missed my point.
You and other vocal members of the party excusing and/or supporting such actions are the representatives of which I speak, not Rush (although he is far more than "an entertainer".)
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
in case you miss it...post 285....
i have to tell you, what you are proposing is a party that marches in lockstep....
LAME-O response ~~~ What Prakosh, your BFFBF said was that sheri's cancer was her karma, I am sure TuTu recalls that too. So answer the fucking question toad breath.
So no answers eh? Where's all the outrage you displayed a couple of days ago. All the fucks, the faux outrage over mean things being said about Obama! What's the matter? You shoot your wad already?
Answer the question Foggy.
Surely Sheri's cancer was just as awful as yours, right? I mean surely you, who address a song about Jesus love you, yes he do, as being so low that you can't even deal with it, that surely you must have an opinion about what Prakosh said about sheri right? .
You're all about pointing out other people's low and base behavior. So let's hear from you on this one. Lord knows we put up with your ranting all day the other day.
No, what I am proposing is that people who in some threads speak of their pride in the party being color-blind, actually backing up that pride with action.
C
Cancel5
Guest
Did you forget, Harley, I don't believe in Jesus!
Tutu can't speak for herself, she's gotta bring in the tanks! Akakakaka I mean pee shooter!
Tutu can't speak for herself, she's gotta bring in the tanks! Akakakaka I mean pee shooter!
C
Cancel5
Guest
You must really be angry, I have never seen you type so poorly! Ahahahaha!
I support Rush's decision and freedoms to point out the hypocrisy, racism, and hatred on the left using his chosen venue, which is parody and satire. He is an entertainer Damo, he's not an elected leader Mr kool aid drinker.
You misrepresented his reasosn and motive for playing that song...it's that simple. That's what I argued against. I never said I liked the song, I never defended the song. You stated he did it "'cause the other guy did it first" That's pure BS!
C
Cancel5
Guest
Tutu is afraid! to state if this is what she means, so be it! She doesn't have the guts to come and do it! then fine! I know what she meant, she doesn't have to readdress the subject!
There is a huge difference between the two parties in how to deal with racism.
With one party, the focus is on race, it is what Rush attempted to make fun of but wound up stepping in. That party thinks that we should divide people up into each ethnicity, gender, sexual preference and whatever further divide we can come up with and make laws regarding how they should be treated at all times.
In the other party, the focus is to look in other directions than separation and division to bring us together in a society that can finally conquer the inane "racism" that hounds us. They believe that focusing on race can only make us continue to focus on our differences rather than what brings us together or finding what can bring us together.
When somebody takes the focus away from that, and brings it back to the party being "whites with attitude" for the other side, they need to have some counsel whispered in their ear. This isn't what we aim for, rather than support and bring them their bath water we should try to re-aim the party towards the goal.
With one party, the focus is on race, it is what Rush attempted to make fun of but wound up stepping in. That party thinks that we should divide people up into each ethnicity, gender, sexual preference and whatever further divide we can come up with and make laws regarding how they should be treated at all times.
In the other party, the focus is to look in other directions than separation and division to bring us together in a society that can finally conquer the inane "racism" that hounds us. They believe that focusing on race can only make us continue to focus on our differences rather than what brings us together or finding what can bring us together.
When somebody takes the focus away from that, and brings it back to the party being "whites with attitude" for the other side, they need to have some counsel whispered in their ear. This isn't what we aim for, rather than support and bring them their bath water we should try to re-aim the party towards the goal.
What people, in this thread, speak of their "pride" of the party??? Certainly I take no pride in a political party. I do believe that idealogically the republican party espouses more of my ideas of smaller government...you really are laying the hyperbole on thick Damo.
Last edited:
Still won't answer the question eh Foggy? Your cancer is more devastating is it?
I have not represented a "reason" at all. I have simply stated that the song gives fodder, and those that continue to support it provide still more, for those on the left to point at the party as "racist".