Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
ACHIEVEMENTS IN EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, SOCIAL SERVICES DOES NOT EQUATE A GOOD MORAL CHARACTER.
Life's little contradiction
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
And, the proof is that more college educated people who are well off demand the government give the poor social services, and are registered as Democrats, actually are immoral, rotten assholes bound for Hell.
Gosh, lib bad. Deep insight.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Liberals, in the traditional sense of the word, are fine. It's the Progressive Left that are evil rotten assholes.
And you are an angel.
Name them.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
A classical liberal is someone who advocates for private property, economic freedom, the rule of law, free trade, and a republican style of government that protects free speech and freedom of association.
Classical Liberalism: What It Is and Is It Still Relevant?
Dive right into the philosophy of classical liberalism and learn why this philosophy of individual freedom and private property is still politically relevant.
spreadgreatideas.org
It is a belief that Rights come a natural source and are not something given to people by government. Classical liberalism believes everyone is entitled equal opportunity but not equal outcomes, particularly not ones where government force is used to produce them.
The Left on the other hand, believes that Rights come from government and that government force should be used to produce equal outcomes.
Name those people, as I asked.A classical liberal is someone who advocates for private property, economic freedom, the rule of law, free trade, and a republican style of government that protects free speech and freedom of association.
Classical Liberalism: What It Is and Is It Still Relevant?
Dive right into the philosophy of classical liberalism and learn why this philosophy of individual freedom and private property is still politically relevant.
It is a belief that Rights come a natural source and are not something given to people by government. Classical liberalism believes everyone is entitled equal opportunity but not equal outcomes, particularly not ones where government force is used to produce them.
The Left on the other hand, believes that Rights come from government and that government force should be used to produce equal outcomes.
Nature gives rights? How?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
goodnight jerkoff
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Rights are natural. That is they exist outside of government. They can and do exist whether government exists or not. If Rights are bestowed by government, then government can take them away.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
That statement is false because it confuses correlation, opinion, and moral judgment with objective proof.
Why It is false.
- No Evidence of Immorality
- Being college‑educated, financially secure, or registered as a Democrat does not inherently make someone immoral.
- Morality is judged by actions (e.g., honesty, compassion, harm to others), not by education level, income, or political affiliation.
- Logical Fallacy – Hasty Generalization
- The claim takes a broad group (“college educated Democrats who support social services”) and labels them all “immoral assholes bound for Hell.”
- That’s a sweeping generalization without evidence, and it ignores the diversity of values and behaviors within that group.
- False Proof
- The statement says “the proof is…” but provides no actual proof—only an assertion.
- Proof requires verifiable data, studies, or logical reasoning. None is offered here.
- Religious Judgment Misapplied
- Declaring people “bound for Hell” is a theological claim, not a factual one.
- Different faiths and philosophies define morality and the afterlife differently, so it cannot be used as universal evidence.
- Mischaracterization of Social Services
- Supporting government aid for the poor is not evidence of immorality. Many ethical frameworks (Christian charity, human rights, utilitarianism) see helping the disadvantaged as moral.
- Disagreeing with social services is a political opinion, not a measure of moral worth.
Key Point
The statement is false because it pretends opinion is proof, relies on sweeping generalizations, and equates political affiliation with moral destiny. In reality, morality is not determined by education, wealth, or party registration.
Last edited:
Jake Starkey
Verified User
Say it: President Piggy.
SAY IT: The people in charge dont give a Flying Fuck about you....they no longer even bother to pretend to believe otherwise.
Bend Over.....this is going to hurt.
U were well warned.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
You are stoned again, piggy.
Much more importantly I am right again.....thats what the education was for.
And I am nicer than you.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
No, you are not right, and I am so much nicer than you.
But let's have a nice contest.
You go first.
But let's have a nice contest.
You go first.