Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
I have no problem with SHARING the blame, I was responding to a pinhead who said that all our problems were the fault of REPUBLICANS.... which you just admitted was a LIE.
Thanks.
Libs left with nothing to say
- Thread starter Dixie - In Memoriam
- Start date
I have no problem with SHARING the blame, I was responding to a pinhead who said that all our problems were the fault of REPUBLICANS.... which you just admitted was a LIE.
Thanks.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Well obviously you DO have a problem sharing the blame as noted in your first quote just above this comment...
So....which time were you lying?
Your first quote or your second quote?
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Both statements are the truth, idiot. It's like, if you had an idea that was stupid, and I went along with it... I can share the blame for going along with it, but it was still your idea. Democrats had the idea of lowering the standards for F&F home loans, to make it easier for poor people to buy homes with government-backed loans. Republicans, namely George W. Bush, went along with this idea, and took political credit for going along with it... then it failed, like most pinhead liberal ideas. And now, we have pinheads running around laying ALL THE BLAME on Republicans! The only thing I have challenged, is that. Sorry, Republicans were not solely to blame for it, as it was the idea of liberal democrats... they just went along with it.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
are you going to admit onceler is correct that the trend is up....you said up until this release, he would have been correct...thus stating he is not correct, which you later changed to say he is correct. you're confused SF....on the one hand, you say "would have been correct" and on the other you say "he is correct"
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
and here you state onceler is wrong by stating "The correct answer is: most leading economic indicators are trending up".....
that is exactly what i was saying regarding the mountain analogy you were so anal over....that NOW, the indicators are trending downward....the SAME thing you just said...you're really confused SF
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
way to debate the issue onceler....ad homs all the way
i'll just wait for SF to show up and do your work for you because you are incapable of debate on most issues, including this
"Debate the issue" - even more hilarious.
Do you mean like frantically jumping on a thread & ridiculing my statement that most leading indicators have been trending up, and then later admitting that they are in fact trending up? (oh, excuse me - I meant that they SEEM to be trending up...LOL)
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Yes.... he was correct. I saw a couple of his posts saying indicators were up, then when he restated to say trending up, I was already in the mode to correct him and in doing so hastily, what I stated was incorrect with regard to the trend.
Note.... his first couple posts simply said the indicators were positive.... but I know... you got me on this one yurt.... Congrats.... Now, are you going to admit you are a fucking idiot on the topic or do we need to continue proving it?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
why do i need to admit i'm an idiot when your posts show you are the one who screwed up? it is funny....i'm idiot for saying the same thing you did....but you are so smart because you have an econ degree....yet you fucked this up in the same manner you think i fucked it up.
and your excuse is lame as you said it TWICE. i quoted both times, since you ignored the second quote...i'll post it again....here you flat out contradict yourself to the above:
like i said, you're confused and terribly so.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO... poor desperate yurt.... As I said, I did indeed fuck up on this thread. It happened because I responded quickly to multiple posts. The difference dear little twit, is that no one on here provided me with links showing me that I was wrong. Had someone posted the links I did and said 'hey, this is why you are wrong'.... I would not have continued pretending I was right and continued spinning away like the pathetic little hackjob you did.
I did not fuck up in the manner you did. What I stated was poorly worded to be sure. I have now corrected myself. You on the other hand continue pretending you were correct.
I know you are going to go on and on with this, so even if you spin it into twice.... I really didn't feel the need to say I was wrong in response to both of your posts. I thought you would at least be intelligent enough to comprehend the fact that if I stated I was wrong that it was for how ever many times I stated it incorrectly. That said.... for the record... I only stated they were trending down once.... The word trending was a poor choice of words. As the remainder of the comment stated... one month is just a blip.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i think MY opinion is correct based upon the housing, employment and GDP. those are main street issues, not so much wallstreet issues. the overall factors that really don't effect mainstreet do appear and have been trending up until a month ago. why is it your little brain can't comprehend such a simple concept? i mean, you brag about how smart you are because you have an econ undergrad, yet you can't grasp simple concepts like the above or simple analogies that a 4 year old could understand.
and again, you are calling me an idiot for saying virtually the SAME thing you said. that makes you an idiot SF. congrats on calling yourself out, that takes courage.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
ROFLMAO.... so NOW you are going to dictate which indicators are 'main street' and which are 'wall street', which should be included and which should not? Well golly gee.... why didn't you just tell us you were going to do that for us. I am glad you are able to rewrite economics for the rest of us so we quit paying attention to these 'wall street' indicators.
May as well toss this out:
Now.... take a look at the articles here..... http://www.ttnews.com/articles/baset...?storyid=26141
Note the headlines of them....
© 2010, Transport Topics Publishing Group. All rights reserved. RELATED ARTICLES
Leading Indicators Fall in April (5/19/2011 10:00:00 AM)
Leading Economic Indicators Grow 0.4% (4/21/2011 10:00:00 AM)
Leading Economic Indicators Improve 0.8% (3/18/2011 8:10:00 AM)
Leading Economic Indicators Rise for Seventh Month (2/17/2011 10:10:00 AM)
Leading Economic Indicators Jump in December (1/20/2011 10:15:00 AM)
Just toss them out folks.... don't need these reports any more. YURT has a new system to teach us.
Seriously.... this is one of the dumbest things you have ever posted yurt... and that is saying a lot.
We are NOT saying the same thing you dolt. AS I stated, I was wrong in how I responded to toppy. AS I stated.... I KNEW you would continue trying to spin away at this.
THE FACT IS: I have provided links to PROVE you are wrong. I have admitted to stating my response to toppy in THIS thread incorrectly (meaning I was wrong in how I stated it)
THE SECOND FACT IS: you are a fucking moron with no integrity. You continue to try and grasp at your 'gotcha' moment rather than simply admitting you were fucking wrong.
What opinion? The opinion you formulated in the space between ridiculing the idea that most indicators have been trending up & saying it's wrong, & agreeing with that assessment?
Face it - you know shite about the economy. Your only purpose in these threads is partisan sniping; you bail on the real points regarding the economy, get hung up on the minutiae of a word, and then if other posters don't choose to bail on the real discussion & focus on the minutiae with you, they're "afraid to debate."
Too predictable, Yurtsie. But really - you should steer clear of economic discussion....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
my purpose is sniping? you've done nothing but insult everyone who doesn't agree with you in this thread. you have not contributed anything of real value to this thread. take the above post for example, no debate, just pure sniping and whining.
like i said, you're a human projector. at least SF debates the issues and backs up his claims. you just insult people and call them stupid if they don't agree with you.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i said indicators are not trending up. you said indicators are not trending up.
yeah...we didn't say the same thing.
