Liberals go beyond reason over Ginsberg....

PostmodernProphet

fully immersed in faith..
in another thread one of our weakest minded liberals has posted....

Lithwick's opinion is mine also.

"The serious arguments in favor of Ginsburg’s conduct are that (1) the nation faces an unparalleled existential threat, at the nomination of a man who imperils the very rule of law

this causes me to ask, how much dumber can liberals possibly get?.....

is Chrispy in her right mind to admit that she believes Trump "imperils the very rule of law"?.....does she even comprehend what "the very rule of law" even means?.......

tell us, Chrispy, what....the.....fuck.....are you even thinking?......
 
I guess it's all perspective. I personally see a lot of righties doing their usual thing of taking a borderline action and making it the most egregious thing that any human has ever done ever.
 
I guess it's all perspective. I personally see a lot of righties doing their usual thing of taking a borderline action and making it the most egregious thing that any human has ever done ever.

so saying that Trump is imperiling the rule of law is a borderline action?.......personally I think its about as extreme a claim as one can make about the other side in a political election.......what are they going to claim about him that is worse?......
 
so saying that Trump is imperiling the rule of law is a borderline action?.......personally I think its about as extreme a claim as one can make about the other side in a political election.......what are they going to claim about him that is worse?......

Trump has suggested flouting the laws numerous times. It's hardly a baseless claim.

Typical tempest in a teacup w/ you guys.
 
in another thread one of our weakest minded liberals has posted....

this causes me to ask, how much dumber can liberals possibly get?.....

is Chrispy in her right mind to admit that she believes Trump "imperils the very rule of law"?.....does she even comprehend what "the very rule of law" even means?.......

tell us, Chrispy, what....the.....fuck.....are you even thinking?......

How...expected of you to cherry pick the article to support your dig, and ignore the rest. I do think Trump's support and approval of racism, xenophobia and violence shows a careless disregard of law.

Lithwick's opinion is mine also.

"There can be no disputing that this conduct was improper under the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, which prohibits judges from endorsing or opposing a candidate for office, and under basic conventions that prohibit judges from overt politicking during election season."
 
???....of course it is......you don't even seriously believe what you just posted......no rational person could....

Lots of rational people do. Trump has certainly suggested ignoring international law, but has also talked about compromising the constitution domestically, as well.

Are you even paying attention this election?
 
Lots of rational people do. Trump has certainly suggested ignoring international law, but has also talked about compromising the constitution domestically, as well.

Are you even paying attention this election?

International law is a joke. We aren't obliged to follow it.

BTW when you overlook the President and sanctuary cities ignoring laws you have no place to talk

Fuck off
 
apparently liberals have decided we wouldn't remain a democracy if Trump gets elected......

If Trump does get elected the derangement will be unparalleled lol. That's what Ginsburg's comments boil down to---derangement. She REALLY thinks Trump would be a Hitler or whatever.

And fretting over the rule of law is simply rich.
 
I am still a Cruz guy. But I am strongly considering Trump just for the fuck of it. If I thought it would give a stroke and you would die, I would definitely do it

I hope your children are slaughtered by ISIS
 
I am still a Cruz guy. But I am strongly considering Trump just for the fuck of it. If I thought it would give a stroke and you would die, I would definitely do it

I hope your children are slaughtered by ISIS

The latter lost its shock value before you even said it or something like it for the 1st of dozens of times.

And you adore Trump. Half of your posts here now are scrambling frantically to defend him. It's a joy to watch.
 
The latter lost its shock value before you even said it or something like it for the 1st of dozens of times.

And you adore Trump. Half of your posts here now are scrambling frantically to defend him. It's a joy to watch.

Can you back up your last statement? You mistake mocking you for defending Trump.

But if that is the standard you use then you are obviously supporting and will vote for Crooked Hillary.
 
Lots of rational people do. Trump has certainly suggested ignoring international law, but has also talked about compromising the constitution domestically, as well.

Are you even paying attention this election?

I suppose someone who pays attention like you do can come with a lucid example of him proposing to "flaut the law"?....
 
If Trump does get elected the derangement will be unparalleled lol. That's what Ginsburg's comments boil down to---derangement. She REALLY thinks Trump would be a Hitler or whatever.

And fretting over the rule of law is simply rich.

What qualifies Trump to be president besides his age and natural-born citizenship?
 
Back
Top