Liberals - Explain Why the State Media colluded to DEFEAT BERNIE SANDERS

Bigdog

Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Bernie had the support of the people judging by his rallies. And he only lost the primary to the Hillbag 2200 to 1800 despite the State Media collusion..
 
Bernie had the support of the people judging by his rallies. And he only lost the primary to the Hillbag 2200 to 1800 despite the State Media collusion..

The media did no such thing and, as was expected, after the primaries moved out of the Northeast and into the South and West, Hillary started racking up win after win and beat Bernie fair and square.

But you're a known liar, so your BS isn't taken seriously anyway.

Just another obviously transparent and weak-ass attempt to deflect attention away from Trump's Russian collusion.

Fail.
 
Hmmm ... I guess collusion is just not a big deal to the Left.

:dunno:

No, it's just that most of us don't think it's worth wasting our time on this kind of bullshït.

I felt sorry for you and figured I'd throw you a crumb.
 
The media did no such thing and, as was expected, after the primaries moved out of the Northeast and into the South and West, Hillary started racking up win after win and beat Bernie fair and square.

But you're a known liar, so your BS isn't taken seriously anyway.

Just another obviously transparent and weak-ass attempt to deflect attention away from Trump's Russian collusion.

Fail.

I don't agree on much with Bernie but he is a likeable character and a principled socialist. Till he got caught living like a capitalist pig, anyway lol. I totally understood why his supporters were pissed.

This HuffPo writer agrees with the OP:

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57b365a4e4b0b3bb4b0800bd

He even referred to the NYT as 'Hillary's private PR firm'. Which everyone outside the Bubble knows is true. The link is interesting because it demonstrates that even progressives will admit to media bias.

At least when it's their ox that's getting gored.
 
No, it's just that most of us don't think it's worth wasting our time on this kind of bullshït.

I felt sorry for you and figured I'd throw you a crumb.
You are motivated enough to post

So why did the media rally against Sanders???????????????????
 
You are motivated enough to post

So why did the media rally against Sanders???????????????????

That's easy lol.

Hillary was supposed to be the first woman president. Her myriad failings didn't matter. That she was still a neocon and addicted to regime change, even after Iraq, didn't matter. That she was corrupt, didn't matter.

But Trump and the Deplorables threw a wrench in the works. So now the same media that was out to get Bernie is aligned against Trump.

It's called 'collusion'.
 
In a capitalist state, obviously, all the media work to defend capitalism. Mr Sanders was a serious enemy of this insane system, Mr Trump too dangerous a loose cannon to be endured.
 
That's easy lol.

Hillary was supposed to be the first woman president. Her myriad failings didn't matter. That she was still a neocon and addicted to regime change, even after Iraq, didn't matter. That she was corrupt, didn't matter.

But Trump and the Deplorables threw a wrench in the works. So now the same media that was out to get Bernie is aligned against Trump.

It's called 'collusion'.

excellent description of media collusion
 
I don't agree on much with Bernie but he is a likeable character and a principled socialist. Till he got caught living like a capitalist pig, anyway lol. I totally understood why his supporters were pissed.

This HuffPo writer agrees with the OP:

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57b365a4e4b0b3bb4b0800bd

He even referred to the NYT as 'Hillary's private PR firm'. Which everyone outside the Bubble knows is true. The link is interesting because it demonstrates that even progressives will admit to media bias.

At least when it's their ox that's getting gored.

You should learn how to read. Or at least bother to read an article before you cite it as a source that supposedly backs up your claim.

Had you done either or both, you'd have seen that the OPINION PIECE you linked, which was written by a CONTRIBUTOR, not a staff writer btw, had almost nothing to do with the media. It was mainly about the DNC showing favoritism to Clinton over Sanders.

As I said over and over again last year during the primaries, Clinton is a lifelong Democrat with decades of service AS A DEMOCRAT. Bernie is a lifelong Independent who was just using the party's infrastructure to help his own campaign and further his own self interests.

Why SHOULDN'T or WOULDN'T the DNC have had biased feelings for their own over an outsider?

I see nothing wrong or unusual about it.

The guy who wrote that piece and SUBMITTED IT to HuffPo is obviously just another butthurt BernBot who's still upset that Bernie got shellacked.
 
Last edited:
You should learn how to read. Or at least bother to read an article before you cite it as a source that supposedly backs up your claim.

Had you done either or both, you'd have seen that the OPINION PIECE you linked, which was written by a CONTRIBUTOR, not a staff writer btw, had almost nothing to do with the media. It was mainly about the DNC showing favoritism to Clinton over Sanders.

As I said over and over again last year during the primaries, Clinton is a lifelong Democrat with decades of service AS A DEMOCRAT. Bernie is a lifelong Independent who was just using the party's infrastructure to help his own campaign and further his own self interests.

Why SHOULDN'T or WOULDN'T the DNC have had biased feelings for their own over an outsider?

I see nothing wrong or unusual about it.

The guy who wrote that piece and SUBMITTED IT to HuffPo is obviously just another butthurt BernBot who's still upset that Bernie got shellacked.
do you think the millions of democrats that supported Bernie see "nothing wrong" with DNC corruption
boosting Hillary also?
 
do you think the millions of democrats that supported Bernie see "nothing wrong" with DNC corruption
boosting Hillary also?

Corruption is just a bullshit propaganda term you wing nuts use to make it sound worse than it was.

Having a preference for one candidate over another is a far cry from actively sabotaging a campaign.

The DNC did nothing improper.
 
do you think the millions of democrats that supported Bernie see "nothing wrong" with DNC corruption
boosting Hillary also?

They think 2020 is going to be a cake walk, yet they can't even see the civil war that looms in their own party.
 
Corruption is just a bullshit propaganda term you wing nuts use to make it sound worse than it was.

Having a preference for one candidate over another is a far cry from actively sabotaging a campaign.

The DNC did nothing improper.
maybe not illegal, but def "improper"
to this day Dems that I know that were Bernie Bros still loathe the DNC
 
They think 2020 is going to be a cake walk, yet they can't even see the civil war that looms in their own party.

honestly that isn't my problem to think about..all I care about is getting something done now in between the Russiaphobes ad the worthless Republicans.

time to kick n tax reform and get that GDP up to 3%
do this and the election takes care of itself
 
honestly that isn't my problem to think about..all I care about is getting something done now in between the Russiaphobes ad the worthless Republicans.

time to kick n tax reform and get that GDP up to 3%
do this and the election takes care of itself

Indeed.
 
No, it's just that most of us don't think it's worth wasting our time on this kind of bullshït.

I felt sorry for you and figured I'd throw you a crumb.

so explain again why the media and the democrat establishment colluded to defeat Bernie, I missed it, I'm sure you mentioned it somewhere?
 
Back
Top