Liberals don't like fast food?

I doubt you are. But if you are, you're not a very good one.

"Organic chemistry" simply means Carbon based. Additional definitions vary widely *.
In addition, the FDA has its own somewhat eclectic definitions some of which may be likely to be misinterpreted by consumers.

You are 100% correct that inadequate labor sanitation CAN be a source of food-borne contaminants.
I did a hasty Internet search, and got numerous hits.

There are other possibilities.
Birds can void while in flight. And birds are not unknown in airspace above food crop fields.
In addition, both predator and prey may also invade such spaces. And they seldom carry a roll of toilet paper with them.

The point is, the article I referenced in that comment was from a respected source that simply mentioned the irony that while special classes of food touted as "all natural" for example may cost more; but might be perceived by consumers to be more healthful,
when the reality is; it is ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLE the opposite.

You're welcome to post the U.S. federal regulation which dictates that. I thought it was the farmer's discretion.

Probably so, in many cases. Until you can PROVE it's so in 100% of all cases, I'll continue to consider the article's point as plausible.

Ah.
You mean as I did in these cases?
Yes. You are right. That's why I continue to do so. But thanks for stating the obvious & unnecessary none the less.

Thanks for supplying definitions of common words dipshit.

Is there a federal law requiring gravity to be effective? Idiot.
Raw manure burns (kills) crops.
It must be composted before application. Idiot.
It is impossible for fecal colliform to infect crops from organic fertlizer.
Fact
Idiot
 
Nice lie Dorp.
If they are getting free food it is in the form of a credit card which cannot be accepted by stores for premade food.
Shut the fuck up.

Pay attention Tin Man, the conversation has progressed to preservative-laden foods which the supermarkets are full of.
 
They don't *have* to eat it, they eat it because they like it.

In the USA poor people don't pay for their food and have all kinds of options. They go for the comfort foods usually.

I understood that so many of them live far from civilisation and have to buy what's to be had out there in Hicksville. My point, however, concerned price - and, over here anyway, time. Decent food requires knowledge of ingredients, knowledge of techniques and time to cook - which for many people are now distant dreams.
 
I understood that so many of them live far from civilisation and have to buy what's to be had out there in Hicksville. My point, however, concerned price - and, over here anyway, time. Decent food requires knowledge of ingredients, knowledge of techniques and time to cook - which for many people are now distant dreams.

Hey, there is a village called Hicksville right outside of NYC. Lol.

Like many people in our freeloading population, they lack the ambition to do anything meaningful. They have plenty of time to prepare their food, certainly more time than I do, but they can't peel their eyes away from the Steve Harvey show.
 
#41
You're welcome to continue to try to insult me with name-calling, in lieu of making a persuasive counterargument.
But you haven't refuted a single authoritative quotation in #34.

You would have to refute them all to persuade toward your position.

Besides, I've seen manure spreaders in operation, & unfortunately been downwind on occasion. It wasn't compost.
 
I doubt you are. But if you are, you're not a very good one.

"Organic chemistry" simply means Carbon based. Additional definitions vary widely *.
In addition, the FDA has its own somewhat eclectic definitions some of which may be likely to be misinterpreted by consumers.

You are 100% correct that inadequate labor sanitation CAN be a source of food-borne contaminants.
I did a hasty Internet search, and got numerous hits.

There are other possibilities.
Birds can void while in flight. And birds are not unknown in airspace above food crop fields.
In addition, both predator and prey may also invade such spaces. And they seldom carry a roll of toilet paper with them.

The point is, the article I referenced in that comment was from a respected source that simply mentioned the irony that while special classes of food touted as "all natural" for example may cost more; but might be perceived by consumers to be more healthful,
when the reality is; it is ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLE the opposite.

You're welcome to post the U.S. federal regulation which dictates that. I thought it was the farmer's discretion.

Probably so, in many cases. Until you can PROVE it's so in 100% of all cases, I'll continue to consider the article's point as plausible.

Ah.
You mean as I did in these cases?
Yes. You are right. That's why I continue to do so. But thanks for stating the obvious & unnecessary none the less.

OMG next time read your own links, droolfest.
 
#41
You're welcome to continue to try to insult me with name-calling, in lieu of making a persuasive counterargument.
But you haven't refuted a single authoritative quotation in #34.

You would have to refute them all to persuade toward your position.

Besides, I've seen manure spreaders in operation, & unfortunately been downwind on occasion. It wasn't compost.

1. Raw manure is only spread before a fallow period and allowed to compost in the feild.
2. You entirely started the insult process with me.
3. I will disprove every point later when I am not working.
 
Back
Top