Liberals Decide to Make Election About RUSH!

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

You realize that the economy is improving - right, Dix?

I used to love those threads about the Barracuda - "Hey, pinheads - you have NO idea what's about to happen...do you?"

Not seeing it dude.

Yeah, indicators have ticked up a bit, but people are still struggling. If there is any actual "growth" in the economy, it's certainly not happening fast enough or to the degree we need it to at this point. It's as if the Titanic has already broken in half, and started sinking, and the maintenance crew tells you the bilge pumps ARE working now! It's too late... Too little... and Too late.

 

[Rune]

something that should hold the interest of conservative voters.....

Liberals seem to prefer Romney over any other GOP candidate out there
Liberals have attacked all other GOP candidates without remorse, yet have held back attacks against Romney
Liberals have stayed relatively silent on Obamas all-too-apparent non liberal policies like....
1) signing the NDAA to capture, imprison, and torture american citizens on american soil (but he promised not to use it, kind of like he promised not to bust med MJ dispensaries)
2)extended and expanded both middle east conflicts
3)promised to close gitmo, then reneged by increasing the usage of gitmo
4) way overspent the Bush admin causing the liberals to claim that it wasn't enough, even after they whined about Bush spending like a drunken sailor

So conservatives need to ask is Romney being selected just to oust a so called Liberal president, or
are Liberals helping select Romney because Obama wasn't Liberal enough and they feel Romney is the ticket

either way, y'all are fuckin stupid.

Go ahead and vote for Paul, just try toi keep in mind that you are actualy voting for Obama.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

You do realise that oil formed from algae right? Moron.

Huh? I thought you pinheads told us it was from the Dinosaurs? Remember? That's the whole reason we need to get off fossil fuels? We don't make dinosaurs anymore! We can make algae, so if THAT makes oil, we can all start driving our SUVs again and don't need the government to force us to buy battery-powered roller skates! YEA!!

 

[Rune]

Huh? I thought you pinheads told us it was from the Dinosaurs? Remember? That's the whole reason we need to get off fossil fuels? We don't make dinosaurs anymore! We can make algae, so if THAT makes oil, we can all start driving our SUVs again and don't need the government to force us to buy battery-powered roller skates! YEA!!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Go ahead and vote for Paul, just try toi keep in mind that you are actualy voting for Obama.

I'll say it again...

I'll vote for my principles and watch the world burn, happily....instead of voting for the lesser of two evils to watch the world smolder to death.

 

[Rune]

I'll say it again...

I'll vote for my principles and watch the world burn, happily....instead of voting for the lesser of two evils to watch the world smolder to death.

Thankyou for continuing to support Obama.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

something that should hold the interest of conservative voters.....

Liberals seem to prefer Romney over any other GOP candidate out there
Liberals have attacked all other GOP candidates without remorse, yet have held back attacks against Romney
Liberals have stayed relatively silent on Obamas all-too-apparent non liberal policies like....
1) signing the NDAA to capture, imprison, and torture american citizens on american soil (but he promised not to use it, kind of like he promised not to bust med MJ dispensaries)
2)extended and expanded both middle east conflicts
3)promised to close gitmo, then reneged by increasing the usage of gitmo
4) way overspent the Bush admin causing the liberals to claim that it wasn't enough, even after they whined about Bush spending like a drunken sailor

So conservatives need to ask is Romney being selected just to oust a so called Liberal president, or
are Liberals helping select Romney because Obama wasn't Liberal enough and they feel Romney is the ticket

either way, y'all are fuckin stupid.

Here's the thing about Romney, he does have some tremendous positives people tend to overlook. It takes some cleverness to be elected governor of the most liberal state in America as a Republican. Regardless of what you come up with, he did somehow manage to break through to the other side and win their support.... not many Republicans can pull that off these days. Now, did he completely sell out Conservative values and principles as governor? That's a matter of opinion, I think. As governor, just as he would be as president, he is one man and one aspect of government and how things function. We must remember that. The governor/prez is the person who signs legislation into law or vetoes it. Oh, they can lobby for an idea or plan, they can submit budgets and proposals, but the respective congress has to approve virtually everything, it has to win their approval first.

Furthermore, Romney has the business accolades and understanding of commerce and capitalism... he is a self-made almost-billionaire. If anyone should know and understand, from a purely business acumen, how to extract us from the dismal Obama funk we are in, this man should. If I were an alien from another planet, and just arrived here... not knowing anything more about politics, I would vote for Romney for this logical reason alone. If the problem is the economic growth and prosperity, this is the candidate who brings the most experience and success to the table.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Thankyou for continuing to support Obama.

thank you for showing your complete hypocrisy about America, where everyone has a voice. i'm not allowed to support non mainstream candidates because you disapprove. otherwise im just supporting the most electable candidate.

you are one of the reasons I am stockpiling, for you will be the downfall of society.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Here's the thing about Romney, he does have some tremendous positives people tend to overlook. It takes some cleverness to be elected governor of the most liberal state in America as a Republican. Regardless of what you come up with, he did somehow manage to break through to the other side and win their support.... not many Republicans can pull that off these days. Now, did he completely sell out Conservative values and principles as governor? That's a matter of opinion, I think. As governor, just as he would be as president, he is one man and one aspect of government and how things function. We must remember that. The governor/prez is the person who signs legislation into law or vetoes it. Oh, they can lobby for an idea or plan, they can submit budgets and proposals, but the respective congress has to approve virtually everything, it has to win their approval first.

and a democrat president with a republican house got us NDAA, where you or I can be arrested by the military on our own property, held without charge, representation, and can be tortured for intelligence information. so where's the check and balance?

Furthermore, Romney has the business accolades and understanding of commerce and capitalism... he is a self-made almost-billionaire. If anyone should know and understand, from a purely business acumen, how to extract us from the dismal Obama funk we are in, this man should. If I were an alien from another planet, and just arrived here... not knowing anything more about politics, I would vote for Romney for this logical reason alone. If the problem is the economic growth and prosperity, this is the candidate who brings the most experience and success to the table.

how many 'businessmen' have we had as presidents in the last 30 years? I have not seen ANY positive outcomes to any of them.

 

[Rune]

thank you for showing your complete hypocrisy about America, where everyone has a voice. i'm not allowed to support non mainstream candidates because you disapprove. otherwise im just supporting the most electable candidate.

you are one of the reasons I am stockpiling, for you will be the downfall of society.

Don't be an idiot. I wish Paul could have a legitimate chance as much as you do, but the system will not allow it. Regardless, if I were opposed to Obama, I wouldn't vote for Paul. Principles are fine and dandy, but don't win elections. Beside, what would be better for increasing the numbers of privately held weapons than another Obama victory?

 

[cancel2 2022]

Oh yeah, I know... just like drilling for more domestic oil won't help ease our dependency on foreign oil... I'm a fool to consider that feasible. It's much more feasible to consider fuel from pond scum as opposed to that 'fuel of the past' gasoline! What an idiot I am to hold on to the past like that, huh?

They don't have weapons grade [SUP]235[/SUP]U, they don't have a warhead and they barely have a missile, apart from that you are right!!

 

[Rune]

Here's the thing about Romney, he does have some tremendous positives people tend to overlook. It takes some cleverness to be elected governor of the most liberal state in America as a Republican. Regardless of what you come up with, he did somehow manage to break through to the other side and win their support.... not many Republicans can pull that off these days. Now, did he completely sell out Conservative values and principles as governor? That's a matter of opinion, I think. As governor, just as he would be as president, he is one man and one aspect of government and how things function. We must remember that. The governor/prez is the person who signs legislation into law or vetoes it. Oh, they can lobby for an idea or plan, they can submit budgets and proposals, but the respective congress has to approve virtually everything, it has to win their approval first.



Furthermore, Romney has the business accolades and understanding of commerce and capitalism... he is a self-made almost-billionaire. If anyone should know and understand, from a purely business acumen, how to extract us from the dismal Obama funk we are in, this man should. If I were an alien from another planet, and just arrived here... not knowing anything more about politics, I would vote for Romney for this logical reason alone. If the problem is the economic growth and prosperity, this is the candidate who brings the most experience and success to the table.

You are such a retard. We are liberal in Mass, not stupid. We routinely elect Pubs for governor, since our house and senate are 90% Dem.
Ever heard of King, Weld, Celluci, or Swift (not to mention Romney) and that is just the last 20 years.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Don't be an idiot. I wish Paul could have a legitimate chance as much as you do, but the system will not allow it. Regardless, if I were opposed to Obama, I wouldn't vote for Paul. Principles are fine and dandy, but don't win elections. Beside, what would be better for increasing the numbers of privately held weapons than another Obama victory?

the system won't allow it because YOU buy in to that bullshit premise. The mainstream media forcefeeds you who are the preferred candidates, and that's what you go with. you had no intention of voting for anyone but Obama, so don't bullshit us here.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

I'm actually starting to see the appeal of a Romney candidacy. I know Romney isn't the conservative we wanted, but he is still head and shoulders above Obama. I'm already on record saying, if Newt doesn't pull out, Santorum can't beat Romney, and at this point, it would still be an upset. If Santorum can win AL and MS and that forces Newt to pull out, then he has a long-shot chance to beat Romney in a brokered convention. Otherwise, the GOP has Romney, like it or not.

Now let me explain what is going to happen with either Romney or Santorum...

With Romney, the Liberals are going to continue to attack Rush, Contraception, Social Conservatism, and Mitt will have to dodge the many attempts to catch him in a sound byte, either defending social conservatism or running from it. They will also bash on Romney for being one of the 1%ers. Romney worries me because he doesn't seem to get just how dirty these bastards are going to get and how low they will stoop, and he tends to sound like he is always apologizing or trying to get you to understand him. In any event, social conservatism and Rush Limbaugh, are what the Liberals are going to run on, because they have nothing else.

With Santorum, he will be painted either as a religious wacko rightie who wants to outlaw contraception and chain women to the kitchen sink... or he will be picked apart on how he voted as a senator, which wasn't always conservative. Again, the issue is going to be social conservatism and Rush, because liberals don't have anything else to run on.

The question remains, which one of these cats can handle what the liberals have in store. I personally think Santorum or Newt would do well, but if the establishment and elites want to go down swinging for Romeny, so be it! We'll go with Romney, and watch what unfolds... it's still going to be about social conservatism and Rush, you wait and see!

LOL, we remember when you said Spermin' Herman was the man. That track record of yours...

 

[Rune]

the system won't allow it because YOU buy in to that bullshit premise. The mainstream media forcefeeds you who are the preferred candidates, and that's what you go with. you had no intention of voting for anyone but Obama, so don't bullshit us here.

Please don't try to tell me who I am, you don't know me.
I most certainly would Vote for Paul, he is the only politician to make sense in decades. You know he isn't earning the needed delegates, and it is hardly MY FUCKING FAULT.

Where do you get the idea that i support the two party system? Just because I am liberal and you are conservative doesn't mean we can't have beliefs and desires in common.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Please don't try to tell me who I am, you don't know me.

but YOU can do that to ME? why? because you're a elitist liberal?

I most certainly would Vote for Paul, he is the only politician to make sense in decades. You know he isn't earning the needed delegates, and it is hardly MY FUCKING FAULT.

you fail to understand that it IS your fucking fault. your simple attitude of him being unelectable is all it takes, along with the millions of others who think JUST LIKE YOU!!!!

Where do you get the idea that i support the two party system? Just because I am liberal and you are conservative doesn't mean we can't have beliefs and desires in common.

where do I get the idea that you support a two party system? the simple fact that you still refer to me as a conservative instead of a Libertarian. You see left and right only, nothing else at all, therefore you support the two party system because that is all you are capable of.

 

[Rune]

but YOU can do that to ME? why? because you're a elitist liberal?

you fail to understand that it IS your fucking fault. your simple attitude of him being unelectable is all it takes, along with the millions of others who think JUST LIKE YOU!!!!

where do I get the idea that you support a two party system? the simple fact that you still refer to me as a conservative instead of a Libertarian. You see left and right only, nothing else at all, therefore you support the two party system because that is all you are capable of.

No, you are putting your limitations on me. I am a liberal libertarian, you are a conservative libertarian. That is just the truth.
I did not cause Paul to not garner enough delegates, and I am decrying the two party system, not supporting it. I know it is incredibly difficult for you to fnd common ground with the other side of the spectrum, but it behooves you to try.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, you are putting your limitations on me. I am a liberal libertarian, you are a conservative libertarian. That is just the truth.
I did not cause Paul to not garner enough delegates, and I am decrying the two party system, not supporting it. I know it is incredibly difficult for you to fnd common ground with the other side of the spectrum, but it behooves you to try.

my limitations on you? how is that? i'm voting principles, you are voting lesser of two evils. how is that MY limitation?

what, about you, makes you a Libertarian? on top of that, how do you consider yourself a 'liberal' Libertarian, but i'm a 'conservative' Libertarian?

 

[Rune]

my limitations on you? how is that? i'm voting principles, you are voting lesser of two evils. how is that MY limitation?

what, about you, makes you a Libertarian? on top of that, how do you consider yourself a 'liberal' Libertarian, but i'm a 'conservative' Libertarian?

Not even going to try. Think about the threads I have started, my posts in threads etc. You just can't believe that a liberal can be a libertarian.
You can't possibly believe you are not on the conservative side of the spectrum.

 

[The Dude]

Not seeing it dude.

Yeah, indicators have ticked up a bit, but people are still struggling. If there is any actual "growth" in the economy, it's certainly not happening fast enough or to the degree we need it to at this point. It's as if the Titanic has already broken in half, and started sinking, and the maintenance crew tells you the bilge pumps ARE working now! It's too late... Too little... and Too late.

Wow grand wizard, when a black man is president 3 percent growth and 200,000 jobs a month is the titanic sinking. Way to get out of the trailer park!