W
WinterBorn
Guest
Oh it's all over the board, just take a look around, you can't sling a dead cat without hitting a liberal, busy at work on a new thread about the terrible religious intolerance of the right! DonQ wants to know why we can't have Sharia arbitration? He and other pinheads think that would be a lovely idea! Jarhead has posted a record number of threads, bouncing around between a position like Howard Dean, Harry Reid, and myself have, that the mosque is "in bad taste" and should be built elsewhere, and a position of defiantly proclaiming the mosque shall be built, their rights must be upheld! Liberal after liberal has consistently tried to maintain this position of simply standing up for religious freedoms, while claiming not to support this mosque. Back and forth, all the arguments presented, it appears the liberals do support the mosque, in the name of religious freedom. I think that's fine, I don't blame them for not 'coming out of the closet' with their new found faith, people might get the crazy idea they are radical terrorists, aligned with the enemies of our nation, in a jihad, or something. So, it's probably for the best they keep their Islamic faith under wraps for now. But I just wonder where their religious tolerance was when Margaret Sanger and Madelyn Murray-O'Hare were preaching their Atheistic anti-religious philosophies? It might have been nice if they had embraced Sharia back then, huh?
If its all over the board, then you should have no trouble pointing out one single instance of people wanting to adopt the muslim faith. But you can't, can you.
Now, there have been numerous people defending the muslims right to build what they want on their property. But that is not what you said in your opening rant.
By your standards, everyone who participated in the Civil Rights marches is black, everyone who campaigned for gay rights is gay, and everyone who supported women's rights is a woman.
Not quite accurate, now is it Dixie?