Liberalism Without Illusions

The Democrats' obsession with identity politics was one downfall. Trans rights? WHO FUCKING CARES!
Perhaps you’re onto something. If you’re correct, the most disturbing part of your answer is actually your question.

“WHO FUCKING CARES?”, if true, says a lot about the heart of this country.
 
Perhaps you’re onto something. If you’re correct, the most disturbing part of your answer is actually your question.

“WHO FUCKING CARES?”, if true, says a lot about the heart of this country.
no it doesn''t, illiterate buffoon.

two or more functioning practical non Nazi parties would be nice.
 
Liberalism is a political and philosophical tradition that emphasizes individual rights, freedoms, and autonomy within a society governed by the rule of law. It advocates for limited government interference, protection of civil liberties, and the freedom for individuals to pursue their own interests and values. Key figures like John Locke founded the tradition, and John Stuart Mill famously defended individual liberty as essential for personal growth and societal progress.

That is the perfect description of Classical Liberalism, which is the direct opposite of today's leftist-Marxist liberalism.
 
These are fallacies because they're only collectivist constructs that don't exist without the assumption that they do.
They are not fallacies. They do no violate any rule of logic. Further, the circular argument by itself is not a fallacy. Further, if something exists, it therefore exists. ?A->A is a perfectly valid equation and forms the Identity axiom.

The ad populum fallacy only occurs when someone tries to prove it 'better' because it is popular.
The fact that something is popular is not itself a fallacy.

The meaning behind the words is what exist, not the words themselves,
Both exist.
not even the print or the paper it's on.
Words are not print or paper. Both printing and paper are popular though.
The results of the election, not the data from machines.
Nonsequitur.
 
Auto correct usually gaffs because it has to pick one possibility and it has no reasoning behind it's choice.
Absolutely. The less context it can glean, the worse it is.
It just picks based on left to right alphabetical logic.
Modern versions are much better than this.
Between keyboard spell check, browser spell check and google spell check, it's simple.
If, and only if, it is in the dictionary incorporated into that system.
You only need a phonic understanding of English. You can read just fine without memorizing how to spell everything. Very little adheres to every rule. And like the video i showed, it's mostly just nonsense for the purpose of causing inability to think.
This sentence contains a misspelling. It also contains a grammatical error. See if you can spot them.
The more shit in your head the less you're able to think. Indoctrinated agnosia. Learning a word makes you blind to the true meaning behind it. The part of the word that actually exists.
Learning a word is also learning the meaning of it.
 
Back
Top