Liberal tried to assassinate Trump over fear he would become president

You think that is not rhetoric, but pictures can be rhetoric. You directly stated that because Palin put a target on Gifford that this was why the shooter shot her.

You are wrong of course. But then, you're retarded.
if non-linear parallels (whatever the fuck that strange beast might be) can lead us to compare Trump and Hitler, then obviously the same non-linear parallels can bring us to the conclusion that our board liberals are just like the Orlando shooter......
 
He promoted love for all without exclusion didn't he? That doesn't sound like any conservative I ever met.

well there's the problem then.......you've spent your entire life watching tele-evangelists and MSNBC from your mother's basement.......get out and experience real life.....
 
It's a lie. Gifford's shooter was a certifiable loon that couldn't put two coherent sentences together.

As I predicted after the Orlando shooting, liberals who were going above and beyond to deny any links to Islam or any rhetoric from the Iman who called for gays to be put death. But here, with no proof the guy even saw the ad, they immediately know for a fact it was Palin's rhetoric.

Completely opposite because a conservative made the ad.
 
As I predicted after the Orlando shooting, liberals who were going above and beyond to deny any links to Islam or any rhetoric from the Iman who called for gays to be put death. But here, with no proof the guy even saw the ad, they immediately know for a fact it was Palin's rhetoric.

Completely opposite because a conservative made the ad.

And why isn't the reverse true, then?

Didn't conservatives who called the Gifford shooting a lone lunatic try to make Orlando about Islam?
 
deep down the liberals on this sight cheer for Trump to be assassinated. Don't kid yourselves. They are an evil vile bunch

Why do you think they ignore a six year old girl being raped and sexually abused by syrian refugees?

They don't want anything to impede their quest for power
 
deep down the liberals on this sight cheer for Trump to be assassinated. Don't kid yourselves. They are an evil vile bunch

Why do you think they ignore a six year old girl being raped and sexually abused by syrian refugees?

They don't want anything to impede their quest for power

That's a pretty big lack of self-awareness, there.
 
And why isn't the reverse true, then?

Didn't conservatives who called the Gifford shooting a lone lunatic try to make Orlando about Islam?

Did they? I mean the guy there said he was doing it in the name of Allah, said he was for ISIS, doesn't seem a stretch for people to think that given his words. But with Giffords, he never said he did it for political beliefs and certainly no evidence whatsoever tied Palin's ad to the attack.
 
do you mean that dust up where that woman was reaching for Trump? The case was dismissed.
Clinton is an innate interventionist. She came up with the "Friends of Syria" nonscense. To be clear Obama's policy was " Assad Must Go"
but as sec of state she implemented that by shuttle diplomacy -weakening but not toppling assad and advantaging the Islamists..

Libya : look at what the "tic toc on Libya" states. That was composed by her OWN State Dept! They use "architect".
She was also chief advocate (read the NYTimes article)that swayed Obama.
Yes Rice was in the picture as UN Ambassador with her 'Viagra rape' lies, but Clinton came away from Paris determined
to intervene ( bomb) Qadaffi. She swayed Obam to go along..This is all documented.

PSI run a semi-blog/thread on Libya. You might like to poke around. Libya Civil War ~ 2014 to Present

Obama calls Libya his biggest mistake, but deflects the blame to Cameron and the aftermath.
In truth bombing Qaddafi who was an allie on the war on terror, and going along with Clinton was the mistake.
US/NATO took an allie ,under false premises of "humanitarian war" and turned it into a failed , terrorist state.

That's Clinton just like her vote for Iraq, and her "Friends of Syria: crap.
PS. I appreciated the honest discussion here.

Hillary Clinton had ‘ownership’ of U.S. Libya policy, own aide said
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/21/hillary-clinton-had-ownership-of-us-libya-policy-o/

There were no charges filed in the first place. So no, the case was not dismissed. That wasn't the real issue. The issue was that the Trump campaign lied and it and scapegoated the journalist that was assaulted. People can watch what happened and make up their own minds.

Trump first said that he supported the intervention in Libya. Then, he lied and claimed he never did. So, it's just like I said. At least, with Hillary Clinton we know what we're getting.
 
There were no charges filed in the first place. So no, the case was not dismissed. That wasn't the real issue. The issue was that the Trump campaign lied and it and scapegoated the journalist that was assaulted. People can watch what happened and make up their own minds.

Trump first said that he supported the intervention in Libya. Then, he lied and claimed he never did. So, it's just like I said. At least, with Hillary Clinton we know what we're getting.

Nice job.
Bouncing anaata's hollow head like a basketball.
 
There were no charges filed in the first place. So no, the case was not dismissed. That wasn't the real issue. The issue was that the Trump campaign lied and it and scapegoated the journalist that was assaulted. People can watch what happened and make up their own minds.

Trump first said that he supported the intervention in Libya. Then, he lied and claimed he never did. So, it's just like I said. At least, with Hillary Clinton we know what we're getting.
the whole thing was a tempest in a teapot,i don't see much value in extrapolating as you do about "assaults"

Trump says all kina shit.first he was against it, then he was for it -but Trump wasn't the chief architect and advocate.
Libya is Clinton's baby..she further pressed the case with claiming qadaffi troop's used "Viagra rape"as a weapon of war.
Humanitarian groups never found any evidence. she never retracted, instead her and Rice doubled down

ya we do know what we're getting with Clinton, like her position on Syria, and the Iraq vote - she's an innate interventionist.
Oh she still call's it "smart power" -so whatever lame comparison made to Clinton and Trump on Libya
it's Clinton who refuses to learn from her fuck ups.

She's still talking about "bringing democracy to Libya" - straight out of the neocon playbook
 
And why isn't the reverse true, then?

Didn't conservatives who called the Gifford shooting a lone lunatic try to make Orlando about Islam?

Actually, the Orlando shooter made it about Islam based on his own comments/statements both before and during the shooting.
 
Actually, the Orlando shooter made it about Islam based on his own comments/statements both before and during the shooting.

You'll swallow anything at all, wanker. You're a veritable repository for crap.
 
Back
Top