Liberal logic

Grugore said:
It's because I don't live in Commiefornia, you dumb fuck. And we know who is allowing it. The governer of Commiefornia. But the idiots who elected him won't do anything about it. So, why don't you let me know who can prosecute him?
Click to expand...

Your use of colloquialisms is looking more and more like 3rd grader desperation and starting to sound just downright goofy.

Commiefornia? Really? Did you think of that all by your widdle thelf?
 
floridafan said:
Tell us again, and again, how the bill of rights is not part of the constitution, sweetie.
Click to expand...

if the Bill of Rights was part of the constitution, it would be called the constitution, halfwit. AND, EVEN IF you want to consider it part of the constitution, the Bill of Rights is STILL rules for the government, not we the people. learn to read.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if the Bill of Rights was part of the constitution, it would be called the constitution, halfwit. AND, EVEN IF you want to consider it part of the constitution, the Bill of Rights is STILL rules for the government, not we the people. learn to read.
Click to expand...

Then you are saying, like the ass you are, that the people are not affected by the Bill of Rights? The bill of rights was necessary to protect the liberty of the individual. What rights would you have if they had not been added to the Constitution?
 
Last edited:
Grugore said:
That's only 2,000 pounds of wheat. Depending on how big his family is, that's not at all unreasonable. Farmers are big eaters. They require about twice the number of calories.
Click to expand...
LMAO. A ton of wheat for 'big eaters'. Let's just call this what it is...an attempt to skirt silly govt. limits on production. Ironically, these days they subsidize wheat.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the bigger questions should be 1. what gives the federal government any power to tell american farmers how much of any certain kind of crop they can grow, and 2. what they can and cannot do with it. wouldn't you think?
Click to expand...
We have a long history of trying to control markets. The bigger question should be 1. why should the govt. subsidize farmers?
 
Althea said:
I don't see anything about bovine fodder?
Click to expand...

Early in the thread someone claimed the farmers were growing wheat to feed their cattle.. Then they claim they grew 2,000 bushels to feed their family because farmers have big appetites. So asinine....
 
kudzu said:
Early in the thread someone claimed the farmers were growing wheat to feed their cattle.. Then they claim they grew 2,000 bushels to feed their family because farmers have big appetites. So asinine....
Click to expand...
Yep. I've known a few farmers in my time. Lived right next to a dairy farmer for years. Alfalfa is the top shelf product, along with timothy. Wheat? Not so much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top