My goal is for people to stop demanding someone offset their lack of skills and start taking responsibility for themselves. For those of us that have accepted it and done well, we continue to raise our standard of living. You want the low skilled folks to have their standard raised by doing nothing but begging for it. If that particular group's standard is lowered in order to motivate them to do better, fine by me. Since their current standard is based on receiving someone else's money through handouts, it needs to be lowered until they decide to better themselves.
Step up how?
Also, if you get rid of assistance, you lower the standard of living for everyone, including yourself.
That's your goal?
Since their current standard is based on receiving someone else's money through handouts, it needs to be lowered until they decide to better themselves.
So you argued before it wasn't a moral thing, but here you are making that exact same argument again, in contradiction to what you said before.
You're tying wage to moral character, after pretending you weren't doing that.
Are you schizo or something? Multiple personality disorder? What gives with the self-contradictions?
So here you are; arguing to lower everyone's standard of living because of your subjective moral judgment that is completely unearned and to which you have no entitlement.
Got it.
Freeloaders need to have their standard cut in order to motivate them to do better.
When you reduce it for those unwilling to do for themselves and people that have been forced to support their sorry asses for years get to keep more of their own money, it raises their standard.
And the worth is determined by both assistance and the wage. Because the assistance is supplemental to the wage.
You're a fucking coward that says I shouldn't own something then refuses, with permission, to try and take it. Rest assured I have no problem defending myself without a gun. Rest assured you're not man enough to find out.
I want you to prove your claim that you're 100% positive that I receive handouts. Can you, nigger, or do you simply run your mouth like the typical coon?
You can't cut their standard of living without cutting everyone else's. You understand that, right? So if you cut the standard of living, you are telling everyone that America needs to be more like China or Mexico.
Unwilling? They're employed. They have jobs. They work. The businesses are padding their profits by relying on welfare to bridge the gap on low wages. That's welfare dependency. Businesses' profits are directly related to the amount of assistance their workers get.
By making an effort instead of making excuses
If you get rid of handouts, the only ones affected are those getting handouts. Those of us that provide for ourselves and take responsibility for ourselves raise ours.
If I wanted to take it, I'd just wait for you to leave your house. Like what criminals do when they case a joint.
Yeah, you have no problem defending yourself with a gun because you're physically and mentally incapable of defending yourself any other way.
So you're lazy and a pussy.
Unlike you, they have a job. So they're making the effort by being employed. So what the fuck did you mean when you said they should "step up"? Can you speak in specifics or only broad generalities?
OMFG - NO! You can't lower one group's standard of living without lowering everyone else's! Jesus fucking Christ, have you ever taken a macroeconomics class in your life? You're just spouting off nonsense, off the top of your head, thinking the force of your conviction can carry your argument. What a joke.
Lowering the standard of living affects everyone. It results in everyone's standard of living declining. You can't do it in a vacuum. FFS, get a clue.
I'm tying thinking because you can't make a higher wage that you deserve someone else's money to moral standard.
It's an assumption, of course. But it's informed by your inability to use the English language correctly, and your resentment for people who accept handouts. It's like you're overcompensating for something by taking such a drastic approach and extreme position. I wonder what that overcompensation could be for...?
If you can't make it, thus, demanding social welfare handouts, you have no character. You refuse to do for yourself.
You're even dumber than the average nigger.
Worth is determined by the skill. Level of freeloading is determined by whether or not you expect someone to offset your low skills.
If you cut social welfare, you don't lower the standard of those not receiving them..
There is absolutely nothing to prove that a business would raise wages if welfare was cut. NOTHING.