Liberal ABC cancels Last Man Standing

Bill said:
Now you want private enterprises/major corporations to cater some guys personal opinions/views?? YOU COMMIE!!! :(

Get a soap box & go to the park.....
Click to expand...

ABC has the right. I have the right to call them liberal fascists. This is just another page, in the book of unchecked leftist media propaganda they are forcing down Americans throats.

Seriously, how can you take any of the alphabet channels news coverage seriously?
 
Irish said:
Apparently ABC, owned by the very liberal Walt Disney Co, canceled Last Man Standing because it was too conservative for them.

They decided to keep Modern Family, however, and gladly paid out for that show.

So what's the difference? Both got big ratings and made the network money. Only difference is Modern Family is a liberal show and LMS was conservative leaning.

Tim Allen is one of the most moderate conservatives but even he is too "icky" for ABC and their leftist kooks who run that shit network.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Follow the money. ABC would televise public executions if they'd benefit financially.
 
christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes: Follow the money. ABC would televise public executions if they'd benefit financially.
Click to expand...

For once we agree. However all reports show LMS WAS making them money! A lot! It was popular and they were able to sell reruns to other networks. So the only explanation is partisanship.

But isn't there a problem with the media doing ANYTHING to make money? Like releasing the names of terrorists and killers giving them the free notoriety they seek? Showing a car plowing into pedestrians to get viewers. The media is very sick in this country. Left and right.
 
Irish said:
For once we agree. However all reports show LMS WAS making them money! A lot! It was popular and they were able to sell reruns to other networks. So the only explanation is partisanship.

But isn't there a problem with the media doing ANYTHING to make money? Like releasing the names of terrorists and killers giving them the free notoriety they seek? Showing a car plowing into pedestrians to get viewers. The media is very sick in this country. Left and right.
Click to expand...

No. It was making money for 20th Century Fox, which produced it.

Most TV shows don't make money for the network outside of advertising unless they own the show. Additionally the real money is in syndication.
 
Cadillac Man said:
No. It was making money for 20th Century Fox, which produced it.

Most TV shows don't make money for the network outside of advertising unless they own the show. Additionally the real money is in syndication.
Click to expand...

And from what what I read ABC was making good money from the syndication, and ads. No?
 
Althea said:
Who took away Allen's right to freedom of speech?
Click to expand...

No one. But ABC punished him for it, which is their right, but its a stupid business decision made for political reasons. And strikes at the further narrative that the media is very liberal and does not respect others views. Which is turning into a larger liberal problem. Intolerance of others views.
 
Irish said:
Stupid Cunt.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Irish said:
For once we agree. However all reports show LMS WAS making them money! A lot! It was popular and they were able to sell reruns to other networks. So the only explanation is partisanship.

But isn't there a problem with the media doing ANYTHING to make money? Like releasing the names of terrorists and killers giving them the free notoriety they seek? Showing a car plowing into pedestrians to get viewers. The media is very sick in this country. Left and right.
Click to expand...

It may have had more viewership, but it's a simple fact that if it targets a rural base, that demo isn't as valuable as a show that appeals to people in wealthier urban areas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top