Yes, you faggots have done well in your commie censorship drives; nobody is denying that. You faggots need to leave the country and move to some more deviant friendly countries.
I don't know what a "faggot" is, but I do know that only ignorant, uneducated, backwoods slugs use the term. By the way, I'm not going anywhere, motherfucker. This is my country. I will be alive a lot longer than you will be, praise the gods.
 
Again, I've seen no evidence that "LGBTIAX..." exists
I recognize your denial of LGBTQQIAXXXXXXXX+. You'll find that I'm very easy. With me, you can deny the existence of really anything you wish. You can even deny that you are conversing with me. It's all good. I'll give you all the leeway you need to do what you've got to do.

, which is why this conversation has to stop right here
No, that's not how it works. By the way, would you care to guess how you just gave away that you are (far) leftist?

until you provide evidence that such an entity exists.
Nope. You mean to say until you decide to stop actively denying the existence of the LGBTQQIAXXXXXXX+ movement. OK. When you decide to stop denying its existence, I will still be here happy to discuss how Russia is absolutely doing the right thing by outlawing the movement's supremacy, public indecency, and harming of society.
 
The issue here isn't who determines membership.
Correct. The issue is the harm the movement causes society.

The issue here is that you've provided no evidence that such an entity exists in the first place.
I have provided evidence, but I really don't need to first prove the existence of everything I wish to discuss with you.

Let's agree that I acknowledge the existence of the LGBTQQIAXXXXXXX+ movement and that you deny its existence. There. Done.

Question: why are you so against Russia outlawing a movement that you don't believe even exists? Why should you care if Russia were to outlaw purple, midget, hairburning Romulans who flunked math?

I see that you've now changed your acronym from "LGTBQIAXXX..." to "LGTBQQIAXXX...".
Apparently I was mistakenly referring to an obsolete initialism. It changed so frequently. In fact, it was the most frequently changing initialism that never existed. Quite the accomplishment.

I think it's pretty clear that you're just making up these acronyms as you go along.
You should be extending me credit for trying my best to keep up.

I saw your 11 minute video. It's long and has a lot of points. For now, I'll just point out that they made no mention of either your "LGTBQIAXXX..." or your "LGTBQQIAXXX...".
Consider it as a placeholder, just as you use "LGBT" for convenience and not because you are claiming to be the determinant of membership, and that you are cancelling the membership of all the "QQIAXXXXXXX+"
 
For the record, I provided the following link to IBD that names -real- LGTB rights organizations
Aaaah, so you do claim to be the determinant of membership. I might not recognize your authority on this matter, but I sympathize with your sentiments.
 
Back
Top