Levin: ‘This Is Tyranny,’ ‘A Dark Mark on the American Politca

Levin on January 6 Committee: ‘This Is Tyranny,’ ‘A Dark Mark on the American Politcal System’

Levin described the committee’s investigation as a “sham” and declared it would “go down in history as a dark mark on the American political system.”

“There is no way we can get to the truth under this committee,” Levin outlined. “And what is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of a hearing is not to present a Hollywood-produced show trial. The purpose of a hearing is to garner information. They say they had 1,000 witnesses and 140,000 documents. A thousand witnesses and 140,000 documents? In order to determine what? How to protect the Capitol building? A thousand witnesses, and yet they couldn’t call one more, Nancy Pelosi, to explain what she did or didn’t do. And more and more information is coming out about how incompetent and irresponsible Nancy Pelosi was — her failure to protect that building.”

“Now, this is a sham,” he continued. “This will go down in history as a dark mark on the American political system. You can’t see it now — the mob is in control, the mob runs the media; the propaganda is full-throated. You can’t see it now, but history has a way of sobering events. And we will see this one day as the outrageous attack on our system on the prior president, on scores of people that it truly is. It’s an abomination to the American system — not just of justice but our congressional and representative system.”

“This is tyranny,” Levin concluded. “You’re staring it in the face.”


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/202...-a-dark-mark-on-the-american-politcal-system/

WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK WHAT LEVIN SAYS?

HE IS A COMPLETE LYING IDIOT LIKE YOU!
 
Agreed on redundancy.

If you are truly bored, try reading his posts; most are repetitive. He has a cycle of 7 or 8 that are the same as shown by word search.

That said, you should be impressed that he has a decent 3-syllable vocabulary...unlike most Trumpers on JPP.

I was reading his posts, I had to stop on page 2.
 
Wrong severe mental case. You have nothing. You've never had anything. You've left no doubt you're a mental case on steroids. Now take your meds and get some much needed rest. :palm:

Do you really think I am am a mental case"? Really a truly, Princess? You are so adorable when you get all huffy and stuff :)
 
You sad caricature of mental instability and stupidity. She has been EXEMPTED from the hearing investigations. Now run along mental case and take your meds. :palm:

First you are claiming she got "immunity" and now you are claiming she is "exempted." There is no reason to investigate her, but she neither has immunity nor is exempted. If investigation turned in her direction, she would be in trouble.
 
The stupidity and rudeness while they lie is the most amazing part.

Oh, I don't care about the rudeness. I care about the evil. The defense of serious shit and justifying it by the lie that, "those woke, racist, Nazi Democrats are worse so whatever crimes we commit they deserve it".

I really think they feel whatever bullshit they do is ok and how dare we call them on their bullshit!?

Replicant Nazi fucks. Whatcha gonna do?
 
Oh, I don't care about the rudeness. I care about the evil. The defense of serious shit and justifying it by the lie that, "those woke, racist, Nazi Democrats are worse so whatever crimes we commit they deserve it".

I really think they feel whatever bullshit they do is ok and how dare we call them on their bullshit!?

Replicant Nazi fucks. Whatcha gonna do?

It sounds strange, but I am more worried about process than about truth. If the process is good, lies will be corrected to truth. The rudeness is symbolic of a process where the alt right tries to shutdown debate.
 
It sounds strange, but I am more worried about process than about truth. If the process is good, lies will be corrected to truth. The rudeness is symbolic of a process where the alt right tries to shutdown debate.

Mike Pence was very polite during the 2020 Vice Presidential debate. And he was lying his bobble-headed ass off.

Substance is much more important that style.
 
Once again dipshit:

The Capitol Police Board consists of three voting members: the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol. Additionally, the chief of the Capitol Police serves ex officio as a non-voting member.

The Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives is elected at the beginning of each Congress by the membership of the House.

Senate Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper is [/b]elected by the members[/b], serves as the protocol and chief law enforcement officer of the Senate

The Architect of the Capitol (AOC) is accountable to the United States Congress and the Supreme Court.


In other words, dumbass, they answer and are selected by the Congress. Therefore, they REPORT to them. You being a former teacher is exhibit A of why our children are the worst educated in the planet. :palm:


Your earlier posts conveniently left out the role of the Capitol Police Board and its members claiming Pelosi and Schumer controlled security. Then, when you realized you omitted basic information you claimed the Board had that function but was selected by Pelosi and Schumer because they are members of the House.

Your claim: "
Key words, appointed by the legislative branch. That would be Pelosi and Schumer."

The members of each house appoint the members, not Pelosi and Schumer. More importantly, Pelosi and Schumer had no authority to turn down the request for national guard troops nor did they do so. This was a lame attempt to blame others for the violence in the capitol and divert from the major issue.

If students are morons it must be because you were absent the day they covered such basic topics.
 
Substance is much more important that style.

This is not a well formed idea yet, but I have noticed that the alt right prefers videos to text stories. Modern tech allows even amateur videos to look very professional, so they can give an impression of a professional source. It is also fewer expectations of citations.

But, what I have noticed is that it is noticeably more difficult to pick out obviously false information. With reading, you slow down when the things that could be wrong come along. With videos, the producer picks the speed. There are probably other reasons for this. This means false information is easier to pass off in a video.

I think the rudeness is a similar strategy. Politeness tends to encourage conversation, which will slowly work out the truth. Rudeness tends towards shorter, less truth-finding interactions.
 
This is not a well formed idea yet, but I have noticed that the alt right prefers videos to text stories. Modern tech allows even amateur videos to look very professional, so they can give an impression of a professional source. It is also fewer expectations of citations.

But, what I have noticed is that it is noticeably more difficult to pick out obviously false information. With reading, you slow down when the things that could be wrong come along. With videos, the producer picks the speed. There are probably other reasons for this. This means false information is easier to pass off in a video.

I think the rudeness is a similar strategy. Politeness tends to encourage conversation, which will slowly work out the truth. Rudeness tends towards shorter, less truth-finding interactions.

I absolutely agree. That's why when TA Gardensnake and Excess pain send me email transcripts from a hard drive that has been in a store owner we don't know and Rudy's. And these guys expect us to go, "Well, if Rudy says so it must be true".

I don't know. Maybe they don't understand what evidence is. Like the 2020 election. When you get right down to it, after demanding proof "the election was stolen" they just say, "there's no way so many people would have voted for a senile old man" and call their anger that trump lost a "stolen election". They're like 3rd graders with military weapons. Really dangerous.
 
First you are claiming she got "immunity" and now you are claiming she is "exempted." There is no reason to investigate her, but she neither has immunity nor is exempted. If investigation turned in her direction, she would be in trouble.

There is EVERY reason to investigate her and Schumer's actions, along with Mayor Bowser regarding this event. That is, if the effort is to actually recount what occurred before and after the event to ensure that they can be better prepared in the future.

But of course, understanding how events got so out of hand and why the Capitol police were so ill-prepared is not what this inquisition is all about. This is all about Trump Derangement Syndrome and attacking the Republican brand.

Stock up on your meds Walt. November is going to be harsh. ;)
 
Back
Top