Levin: ‘This Is Tyranny,’ ‘A Dark Mark on the American Politca

AssHatZombie said:
the whole thing is ridiculous.

it's not a jury, it's not a trial. the rules were made up by a despotic Nazi Pelosi.

Nazi Pelosi should be forced to testify too actually. she fell down on defending the capital.
Click to expand...

Ahh, here's another one who swallows the right wing bullshit. Don't they ever verify the bullshit they read? I guess not.
They just swallow away.


For months, Fox News star Sean Hannity has led his network’s charge to push the flimsy claim that former President Donald Trump ordered thousands of National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol in the days leading up to the Jan. 6 insurrection. This assertion, meant to undermine the Jan. 6 House committee, was pushed by Hannity on his primetime TV show 43 times and his daily radio program 48 times, according to liberal watchdog Media Matters. The committee, however, refuted this claim when it shared testimony from former acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller saying Trump gave no such order. “I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,” Miller said in the video released on Tuesday. “There was no direct—there was no order from the President.” The ex-Trump official added: “We obviously had plans for activating more folks, but that was not anything more than contingency planning. There was no official message traffic or anything of that nature.” Trump, meanwhile, insisted just last month that he “suggested & offered” up to 20,000 National Guard troops be deployed. Other defense and security officials, however, have testified that Trump never asked for a law enforcement response to the attack.
 
Last edited:
Concart said:
Not only is it not Pelosi's job, but we now know that Trump lied about asking for National Guard troops to protect the capitol. It was a lie from the beginning an all of the Trumptard dumb fucks bought the lie. They are SO easily duped that's laughable.
Click to expand...
As the wall around trump begins to crumble, more and more of his staff of sychophants are deciding to be on the correct side of history
 
floridafan said:
Congress has investigative powers and they are using them right now. I would like you to name a few people who would be witnesses for Trump, knowing that they would be sworn it, and the consequences of lying to Congress.
Click to expand...

nancy pelosi for one.

a real legal proceeding would allow for both sides R and dem to have equal say.

this is a partisan shit show with no legal significance.
 
AssHatZombie said:
no they haven't.

it showed a bunch of dumb hearsay and idiotic speculation.
Click to expand...

Hearsay and speculation from people who worked at the White House, just a few feet away from trump? These are people who were life long Republicans, dedicated to Trump. One could not ask for better witnesses.
 
floridafan said:
Hearsay and speculation from Trumps own attorney?
Every bit of this testimony would be admissible in a court of law.
Who would come forward to defend the ex president? Name some people, handjob.
Click to expand...

would be .... if.....

nancy pelosi's testimony would exonerate trump. but she won't appear in her own fake trial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top