Letters to the Editor: The justices who interpret the Constitution like it's the Bibl

[signalmankenneth]

To the editor: UC Davis law professor Aaron Tang provides a refreshing — and enlightening — take on Supreme Court justices who proclaim absolute certainty in their interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.

Their high degree of certitude parallels what we hear from religious leaders given to interpreting a far older written work — to wit, the Bible, which like the Constitution was written when women were accorded second-class status and slavery was practiced widely.

Fortunately, our Constitution is deemed subject to amendment. Thus Black slaves eventually were freed and women obtained the right to vote.

But where religious zealots proclaim the unamendable Bible to be the "inerrant word of God," it figures that prominent faiths abided subjugation of women and racial segregation for many decades after Constitutional flaws were corrected.

Hence there is no sense in praying that our high court's theocratically inclined majority will concede constitutional uncertainty anytime soon.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/letters-editor-justices-interpret-constitution-100032480.html

 

[Theywillneverlearn!]

Cartoon Ken. You make the case for welfare in this country. Dumber than fuck, lazy and
have no means to support your own dumb ignorant ass. Typical democrat.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

one giant strawman argument, easily discarded as the illogical rantings of someone who isn't capable of understanding the english language

 

[Yakuda]

[FONT=&]To the editor: UC Davis law professor Aaron Tang provides a refreshing — and enlightening — take on Supreme Court justices who proclaim absolute certainty in their interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Their high degree of certitude parallels what we hear from religious leaders given to interpreting a far older written work — to wit, the Bible, which like the Constitution was written when women were accorded second-class status and slavery was practiced widely.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Fortunately, our Constitution is deemed subject to amendment. Thus Black slaves eventually were freed and women obtained the right to vote.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]But where religious zealots proclaim the unamendable Bible to be the "inerrant word of God," it figures that prominent faiths abided subjugation of women and racial segregation for many decades after Constitutional flaws were corrected.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Hence there is no sense in praying that our high court's theocratically inclined majority will concede constitutional uncertainty anytime soon.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/letters-editor-justices-interpret-constitution-100032480.html

[/FONT]

[FONT=&]
[/FONT]

Kenny here is where you trip yourself up, you talk talk too much. You rightly say the Constitution can be amended and it has. The problem is dumb as a box of rocks leftists like you don't want to go through the trouble of amending the constitution. What you nitwits prefer is to legislate from the bench. You know what I mean, like "finding" a right to abortion where it doesn't exist. You're a dunce.