Superfreak
Verified User
She has been off her meds for a few weeks now. The batshit crazy nonsense is peaking.
Let's look at the dem candidates for 2020
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
She has been off her meds for a few weeks now. The batshit crazy nonsense is peaking.
No.
Anyone born white and male, regardless of the socio-economic level they were born into, has institutional advantages afforded to no one else.
It is simpler for a straight white male to overcome the socio-economic class they were born into strictly because of the way the system is designed.
OK, so I thought we were talking about corporate, private-sector jobs, not civil service jobs funded by taxpayers. Jobs that are a necessity for society I don't really consider the same kind of jobs as those in the private sector because those in the public sector are working for the public good, which is a benevolent motivation for employment.
Speak for yourself!
Getin the ring
Verified User
I thought you had posted the biggest crock of $hit I had ever heard before, but this one ^^^ is the cake winner.
2 decades ago maybe.
and on topic, imagine the topic is "Dem candidates" and here you are unable to focus, again
Dems better get busy, really quick, 2 months tops announce someone, ANYONE,
they have lost their identity, do they go old school or new school. they havn't a clue.
No ideas have come forth so it's hard to get a handle on who might be the messenger, when there is no message
Identity politics is all they have right now
Trump is a racist is the Liberal platform
sad
omg, you top yourself AGAIN, before I even congratulate you on the "white male privilege" non-sense
Popular vote
Last edited:
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Tell that to an unemployed coal worker.
It isn’t 1860 anymore and your democrat party isn’t pushing slavery
It's high time for you to ditch this ID of yours and create a new one to re-position yourself. You're gonna need to after I demolish you here and after Trump is removed from office. Just know that I was being nice and offering you an out...you're choosing not to take it. So anything that transpires from here on out is on YOU.
So here we go:
If you paid attention to the thread, you'd have seen my first post in it was how there shouldn't be any Dem nominee over the age of 60. My reasoning was because 60+ is Boomer generation, and they have run the country into the ground with their awful perspectives and policies, and they should be relegated to spectators in politics now because of that.
So that's #GetintheringFAIL #1.
Trump didn't announce his candidacy until June of the year before the election, which is 6 1/2 months from now.
So that's #GetintheringFAIL #2.
Pelosi has said she will step down in 4 years, and the young Democratic insurgents like Ocasio, Omar, Pressley, Khanna, Davids, and others are being placed on influential committees where the old guard liberals like John Lewis, Hakeem Jeffries, and others will set their younger successors up quite cleanly and nicely. Also, Democrats are pretty on message, having trounced the shit out of you Conservatives by 10,000,000 votes a little over a month ago.
So that's #GetintheringFAIL #3.
I'm laughing out loud at a Conservative, who just got his ass handed to him 5 weeks ago by 10,000,000 votes in the House alone, offering his perspective and advice when no one asked for it, and no one wants it.
So that's #GetintheringFAIL #4
The popular vote easily tells us how unpopular and unlikable you people are.
That 3,000,000 vote margin in 2016 grew to 10,000,000 in 2018.
The Blue Tsunami wiped out Conservatives, and 2020 will be even worse for you.
Last edited:
FUCK THEM.
They didn't want to trade digging in a hole in the dirt and black lung for putting solar panels on roofs in the fresh air.
I hope they all fucking die of black lung and I hope their deaths are painful, slow, and draining to their families.
After all, that's what they wanted when we tried to warn them this would happen.
I heard a story on NPR this morning as I drove in about coal miners having all these health problems because of mining coal for so many years, and now they're complaining about the awful health they have as a result of it.
Well, no one forced you to dig in a hole underground with lax safety and environmental standards.
They made that choice, so fuck them all.
If it isn't the 1860's, why are you all so adamant about having statues to the losers of the Civil War?
You certainly do not make that case. What the fuck happened fender head?
cawacko
Well-known member
Um, millennials stayed home. Had they turned out to vote she probably would have won the EC
They did?
Clinton got virtually the same # of votes in 2016 that Obama got in 2012.
It was Trump who got 3,000,000 more votes than Romney.
cawacko
Well-known member
""Of the estimated 24 million people under 30 who voted in the 2016 presidential election, a large majority supported Hillary Clinton. But Clinton received notably less support from young voters (18-29) than Barack Obama did in 2008 and 2012, particularly in the crucial battleground states she lost to Donald Trump.""
https://www.kqed.org/lowdown/24448/how-millennials-voted-in-the-2016-presidential-election
I did not know that. We all owe the Millennials at least a beer!
Right. Just like I said...she got virtually the same # of voters.
Obama (2012): 65,915,795
Clinton (2016): 65,853,514
That's a difference of just 60,000 votes, or a difference of just 0.09%.
Millennials not turning out isn't why Clinton lost...Trump's base of uneducated troglodytes was. The same poor white trash we've just been proving in another thread has been drinking itself to death out of despar.
Those desperate people voted for Trump, and they're who put him over the top.
cawacko
Well-known member
I don't care about her overall number of votes. We're talking about millennials you bigot.
So we're to believe that Millennials who voted for Obama that didn't vote for Clinton were replaced virtually 1:1 in the electorate with...whom?
If Millennials didn't turn out for Clinton, yet she got 99.91% of the same number of votes Obama got, how many Millennials did she lose and who replaced those Millennials in her electorate????
This is the kind of critical thinking you simply don't do because you're lazy as shit.
So...you make the argument that Millennials "didn't show up" for Clinton.
Yet, Clinton received virtually the same # of votes Obama got in 2012.
So that would mean someone had to come in and replace the Millennial votes Clinton lost at nearly a 1:1 rate.
So, cawacko, who were the people who voted for Clinton that replaced the Millennials that you're saying didn't show up for her after showing up for Obama 4 years earlier?????
This is going to require you to do some critical thinking.
So I'm prepared for you to avoid that by leaning on a survey that you didn't bother to question or critically analyze before posting your shitty thesis.
You didn't take into account a major factor that destroys your entire argument, as if it made sense at all. Care to guess what that is?
cawacko
Well-known member
49% of registered millenials voted in 2016. 69% of Boomers did. You call that a big turnout for millinials?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sou...aw1P1qQb5RzeSO9BpeOFD7ME&ust=1545346726865219