Let’s just say it: The Republicans are the problem.

poet

Banned
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story.html




Rep. Allen West, a Florida Republican, was recently captured on video asserting that there are “78 to 81” Democrats in Congress who are members of the Communist Party. Of course, it’s not unusual for some renegade lawmaker from either side of the aisle to say something outrageous. What made West’s comment — right out of the McCarthyite playbook of the 1950s — so striking was the almost complete lack of condemnation from Republican congressional leaders or other major party figures, including the remaining presidential candidates.

It’s not that the GOP leadership agrees with West; it is that such extreme remarks and views are now taken for granted.




We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party.

The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

When one party moves this far from the mainstream, it makes it nearly impossible for the political system to deal constructively with the country’s challenges.

“Both sides do it” or “There is plenty of blame to go around” are the traditional refuges for an American news media intent on proving its lack of bias, while political scientists prefer generality and neutrality when discussing partisan polarization. Many self-styled bipartisan groups, in their search for common ground, propose solutions that move both sides to the center, a strategy that is simply untenable when one side is so far out of reach.

It is clear that the center of gravity in the Republican Party has shifted sharply to the right. Its once-legendary moderate and center-right legislators in the House and the Senate — think Bob Michel, Mickey Edwards, John Danforth, Chuck Hagel — are virtually extinct.

The post-McGovern Democratic Party, by contrast, while losing the bulk of its conservative Dixiecrat contingent in the decades after the civil rights revolution, has retained a more diverse base. Since the Clinton presidency, it has hewed to the center-left on issues from welfare reform to fiscal policy. While the Democrats may have moved from their 40-yard line to their 25, the Republicans have gone from their 40 to somewhere behind their goal post.

What happened? Of course, there were larger forces at work beyond the realignment of the South. They included the mobilization of social conservatives after the 1973Roe v. Wade decision, the anti-tax movement launched in 1978 by California’s Proposition 13, the rise of conservative talk radio after a congressional pay raise in 1989, and the emergence of Fox News and right-wing blogs. But the real move to the bedrock right starts with two names: Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist.


+++++++++++++++++++++truncated+++++++++++++++++++++++

full article at site.
 
they hate everyone, they back histroically failed ideas and they cant get elelcted on what they really want to do.
 
blah blah blah, republicans are racist.....other dems shut their mouths....blah blah blah, democrats are communists.....liberals are pissed because other republicans didn't say anything.

fucking losers, one and all.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story.html


Rep. Allen West, a Florida Republican, was recently captured on video asserting that there are “78 to 81” Democrats in Congress who are members of the Communist Party. Of course, it’s not unusual for some renegade lawmaker from either side of the aisle to say something outrageous. What made West’s comment — right out of the McCarthyite playbook of the 1950s — so striking was the almost complete lack of condemnation from Republican congressional leaders or other major party figures, including the remaining presidential candidates.

It’s not that the GOP leadership agrees with West; it is that such extreme remarks and views are now taken for granted.




We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party.

The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

When one party moves this far from the mainstream, it makes it nearly impossible for the political system to deal constructively with the country’s challenges.

“Both sides do it” or “There is plenty of blame to go around” are the traditional refuges for an American news media intent on proving its lack of bias, while political scientists prefer generality and neutrality when discussing partisan polarization. Many self-styled bipartisan groups, in their search for common ground, propose solutions that move both sides to the center, a strategy that is simply untenable when one side is so far out of reach.

It is clear that the center of gravity in the Republican Party has shifted sharply to the right. Its once-legendary moderate and center-right legislators in the House and the Senate — think Bob Michel, Mickey Edwards, John Danforth, Chuck Hagel — are virtually extinct.

The post-McGovern Democratic Party, by contrast, while losing the bulk of its conservative Dixiecrat contingent in the decades after the civil rights revolution, has retained a more diverse base. Since the Clinton presidency, it has hewed to the center-left on issues from welfare reform to fiscal policy. While the Democrats may have moved from their 40-yard line to their 25, the Republicans have gone from their 40 to somewhere behind their goal post.

What happened? Of course, there were larger forces at work beyond the realignment of the South. They included the mobilization of social conservatives after the 1973Roe v. Wade decision, the anti-tax movement launched in 1978 by California’s Proposition 13, the rise of conservative talk radio after a congressional pay raise in 1989, and the emergence of Fox News and right-wing blogs. But the real move to the bedrock right starts with two names: Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist.


+++++++++++++++++++++truncated+++++++++++++++++++++++

full article at site.

Don't blame the Republican leadership. They didn't say anything because their base probably agrees with West. After witnessing a convention room full supporters, supporters supposedly desiring an " old-fashioned, family values" way of life give a standing ovation to a two-timing two-timer accused of wanting an open marriage....well, does anything surprise you any more? Not one or two " radicals" but a full room of people on national TV, no less.

Some people talk about painting the Republicans with a broad brush but it takes more than a two-inch sash brush
Photo-Brushes-Oval%20Sash.jpg
to paint an entire convention room full of people.

We've seen the typical Republican. A convention room full of them.
 
if the Republicans are causing problems for the liberals it would appear they are doing precisely what they were elected to do.....
 
blah blah blah, republicans are racist.....other dems shut their mouths....blah blah blah, democrats are communists.....liberals are pissed because other republicans didn't say anything.

fucking losers, one and all.


LOL. And that's the extent of your argument/response? LOL. We all knew you couldn't elaborate.
 
Really? Watch as you lose the House, seats in the Senate, governorships, and, oh, yeah....the WH.

independents (you know... the people that actually make or break elections..) currently favoring romney by 6pts.

romney currently leads obama by 2pts overall.

no president in the modern era has won re-election with an approval rating below 50%. Obama is at the mid 40s very consistently over months.

You are delusional if you think this will be anything but a close race.

source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/153902/Romney-Obama-Tight-Race-Gallup-Daily-Tracking-Begins.aspx
 
Seriously, thought you had me on ignore. STFU is what you intimated.

Although poet and I have never spoken specifically about it, I hope I have encouraged him to not "ignore" anyone if at all possible. There are certainly several jerks around here that need to be ignored but there are many ways to do that without using the software feature and not losing out or delaying possibly important information. And besides that threeatening to ignore someone is childish at best. just ignore them if that is your wish.

You seem to be concerned that poet intimated for you to STFU. I agree that he probably meant that and I hope you agree that he probably had good reason to feel that way. I've certainly been on the wrong end of your hatefulness and I don't imagine poet is any exception to that. Which kind of brings us back to ignore. Most that I would ignore would prefer that I do just that except only on THEIR terms. Anymore I refuse. I'll ignore them on MY terms. I find that always preferable.
 
LOL. And that's the extent of your argument/response? LOL. We all knew you couldn't elaborate.
the extent of my argument? all you're seeing here is my total lack of respect for the petty bullshit that both democrats and republican pull in government, and then my absolute disgust at you idiot liberals and conservatives fighting for the scraps from their tables. The fact that you either refuse to see, or just can't see, that you're being played for a ridiculous fool by those in government is glaringly pathetic. so the extent of my argument is nothing more than you're being a total fucking retard thinking they give a fuck about you.
 
the extent of my argument? all you're seeing here is my total lack of respect for the petty bullshit that both democrats and republican pull in government, and then my absolute disgust at you idiot liberals and conservatives fighting for the scraps from their tables. The fact that you either refuse to see, or just can't see, that you're being played for a ridiculous fool by those in government is glaringly pathetic. so the extent of my argument is nothing more than you're being a total fucking retard thinking they give a fuck about you.

There are absolute governmental philosophies and propensities specific to each party. One would have to be an idiot and a fool to ignore that. To date I have not recognized a republican policy or propensity that I would be proud to support. They speak with forked tongues, always.
 
Seriously, thought you had me on ignore. STFU is what you intimated.

Welcome to the "IA" club; but then Poet is already an admitted liar and blowhard.

Oh, I agree with you, that my "pretend ignore" is more "bark" than "bite", and I use it as a "bitchslap", more than anything else. Though folks are on ignore, I'll view some posts, and quite often I see lies being told or me being attacked, "unjustly" or "unwisely"....so, really, what good is it?...
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story.html




Rep. Allen West, a Florida Republican, was recently captured on video asserting that there are “78 to 81” Democrats in Congress who are members of the Communist Party. Of course, it’s not unusual for some renegade lawmaker from either side of the aisle to say something outrageous. What made West’s comment — right out of the McCarthyite playbook of the 1950s — so striking was the almost complete lack of condemnation from Republican congressional leaders or other major party figures, including the remaining presidential candidates.

It’s not that the GOP leadership agrees with West; it is that such extreme remarks and views are now taken for granted.




We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party.

The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

When one party moves this far from the mainstream, it makes it nearly impossible for the political system to deal constructively with the country’s challenges.

“Both sides do it” or “There is plenty of blame to go around” are the traditional refuges for an American news media intent on proving its lack of bias, while political scientists prefer generality and neutrality when discussing partisan polarization. Many self-styled bipartisan groups, in their search for common ground, propose solutions that move both sides to the center, a strategy that is simply untenable when one side is so far out of reach.

It is clear that the center of gravity in the Republican Party has shifted sharply to the right. Its once-legendary moderate and center-right legislators in the House and the Senate — think Bob Michel, Mickey Edwards, John Danforth, Chuck Hagel — are virtually extinct.

The post-McGovern Democratic Party, by contrast, while losing the bulk of its conservative Dixiecrat contingent in the decades after the civil rights revolution, has retained a more diverse base. Since the Clinton presidency, it has hewed to the center-left on issues from welfare reform to fiscal policy. While the Democrats may have moved from their 40-yard line to their 25, the Republicans have gone from their 40 to somewhere behind their goal post.

What happened? Of course, there were larger forces at work beyond the realignment of the South. They included the mobilization of social conservatives after the 1973Roe v. Wade decision, the anti-tax movement launched in 1978 by California’s Proposition 13, the rise of conservative talk radio after a congressional pay raise in 1989, and the emergence of Fox News and right-wing blogs. But the real move to the bedrock right starts with two names: Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist.


+++++++++++++++++++++truncated+++++++++++++++++++++++

full article at site.

not completely accurate, but too close for comfort

left out is the my way or the highway approach by many repubs

the extreme right wing cannot wage a real civil war with weapons and all, so it is doing the next best thing and waging a political civil war

what a mess
 
not completely accurate, but too close for comfort

left out is the my way or the highway approach by many repubs

the extreme right wing cannot wage a real civil war with weapons and all, so it is doing the next best thing and waging a political civil war

what a mess

A mess maybe but this is a war they have studied very hard and have about 60 million idiots for foot soldiers. It's disgusting.
 
Back
Top