Agreed. She'll vote with the law not nutjobs.
![]()
She's fine but calling her America's mom is not a good description.
Agreed. She'll vote with the law not nutjobs.
![]()
She's fine but calling her America's mom is not a good description.
Let's be HONEST ... and Note THE FACTS
The GOP Blocked and Stole a Supreme Court seat, they wouldn't afford the [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]courtesy of a hearing.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The GOP confirmed 218 Trump judges after blocking 110 Obama nominees.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now The GOP is rushing to confirm Amy Coney Barrett 20 days before Nov 3 when over 14 million people have already voted. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]That's definition of court-packing ...[/FONT]
So I don't want to hear a Mother Fucking thing when The Democrats Appoint 5 More Judges, just Shut The Fuck Up
She certainly handled the Democrat Senators like a good mom handles unruly children.![]()
No, she handled it like a lawyer.
And in addition to that, there should be term limits, like 20 years and out. Making this a lifetime appointment is craziness, IMO.
Well yeah, that was my point. The Repubs remove the ethics bar and it will kick their ass if dems win both chambers and the presidency.
You cannot be serious. Cory Booker is a black man, of course he'd be concerned about white supremacy. And Barrett should be also, with two black children. She can protect them only so long before they're out on their own dealing with the kind of people who use the "N" word and other nastiness, like some on JPP. Even trump has to be led kicking and screaming before he condemns white supremacy.
Furthermore, why did she need notes? She figuratively pleaded the fifth on just about all the questions.
What job interview allows you to do nothing but refuse to answer any question?!
He was asking about her personal views on white supremacy, in other words was she a white supremacist? That's why it was a supremely stupid question.
What if the REPUBS win both the chambers and the executive branch?
So far I don't really mind this candidate and even Kavanaugh doesn't seem to be quite as much of a nightmare. However, this is just stupid and wrong. While I agree with the idea that you shouldn't vote in an election year the current actions speak worlds. Pissing away ethics now makes denying the first African American president his right and duty as president look that much worse. People could say it was racially motivated just like a lot of the BS with their handling of Obama and you don't have anyway to counter anymore. You can't say they are wrong because your side pissed away their defense with this ethics nightmare. Now into the future we won't have much ethics to go by on this issue. All's fair in love and war and it looks like politics might follow suit. Do you really want to kneecap yourselves with the possible political prospects on the horizon?
He was asking about her personal views on white supremacy, in other words was she a white supremacist? That's why it was a supremely stupid question.
No one asked or suspected Judge Barrett is or was a White Supremacist. Senator Booker was just grandstanding when he asked her to condemn white supremacy, something the Fucking Moron-in-Chief won't do. Notice how much time he spends whacking at Trump over it.
Someone needs to ask Booker and pretty much every prominent black Democrat if they condemn black supremacy. It would have about the same level of relevance as the white supremacy question.
Which raises the question, why couldn't she just give a straight answer to them.
Yeah......when Trump wins, and the conservatives control both houses after the landslide victory on Nov. 3rd, 2020..........I hear the first thing that will happen is DC and PR will be considered for statehood. Can you say 2 more scoops? The left often does not consider the consequences of anything they act on in a knee jerk reaction. What is to stop Trump from packing the court if there is a conservative landslide?
Do you not remember just why Mr. Trump has had the opportunity to appoint 3 justices? Can you spell dirty politics by the demwits (and I call them demwits for a reason)....it never occurred to them that once they invoked the so called nuclear option and made it mandatory to have but a simple majority vote in the senate to confirm a court appointment instead of the (at the time) usual 60 majority votes. You can thank your own parties corruptness for Trump being allowed to appoint his picks on the court. Harry Reid.....does anyone have to wonder why you decided to RETIRE?
Now you don't even consider What's fair for the goose is fair for the gander.........Trump just might make you eat your words and pack the court himself.
Of course there are clues on how she will vote.......she is a solid constitutional originalist she will abide by the words actually found to exist in the constitution and that is what scares the hell out of the fascist left.
It saddens me to have to tell you this, but Christiecrite is a supremely stupid old woman, Tom.
I don't agree, she's a clever woman but does suffer from BBS (Biden Blindspot Syndrome)