Let’s be perfectly clear

anchovies said:
why not, the uranium wasn't leaving the country
Click to expand...

The conflict of interest; the ongoing FBI criminal investigation, the violation of Hillary's own agreement with the Obama administration, anchovies.

It wasn't supposed to leave the country, but it did, didn't it, anchovies?
 
The New York Times reported on the crooked deal in 2015:

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.

Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

The Clintons took cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

The Clintons hid the donations - a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secretary of State.
 
John Solomon and Alison Spann of The Hill:

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.

The Department of Justice decided to continue "investigating" this for four years without Congress or the public knowing.

The "investigation" was supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, who is now Deputy Attorney General, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who is now the deputy FBI director.

Robert Mueller was head of the FBI from Sept 2001-Sept 2013 until James Comey took over as FBI Director in 2013. They were both involved in Russian collusion - since this case started in 2009 and ended in 2015.
 
Liberals:


tumblr_nj75y6ui4A1s2wio8o1_500.gif
 
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/fbi-kept-russian-bribery-plot-145523683.html

http://www.newsweek.com/probe-launches-russian-bribery-plot-obama-administration-nuclear-deal-687615

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-10-18/russian-money-talks-america-was-all-ears

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/356017-sessions-says-justice-to-review-russian-uranium-deal

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/
 
Obama-Confused-copy.jpg


Obama didn't know that Russia was engaged in what looks suspiciously like bribery ($500,000 to Bill Clinton) or kickbacks ($145 million to the Clinton Foundation) in order to gain atomic resources — when his administration OK’d a deal to give Moscow control of 20% of America’s uranium?

FBI Director at the time: Mueller.

In 2009 the FBI collected evidence of money laundering, blackmail and bribery by Russian nuclear officials, all in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

How did Obama justify approving the Uranium One deal if he knew what his own people knew?

If he did know, what does that mean?

If he didn't, why didn't he?

How come the supposedly-smart Obama didn't know what was happening in his own allegedly "scandal-free" administration?
 
God bless America said:
John Solomon and Alison Spann of The Hill:

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.

The Department of Justice decided to continue "investigating" this for four years without Congress or the public knowing.

The "investigation" was supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, who is now Deputy Attorney General, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who is now the deputy FBI director.

Robert Mueller was head of the FBI from Sept 2001-Sept 2013 until James Comey took over as FBI Director in 2013. They were both involved in Russian collusion - since this case started in 2009 and ended in 2015.
Click to expand...

So indict her already. See if I care. Oh, no evidence for it? No will for it? No political advantage for it? What's your holdup? Until there is an indictment I'm assuming it's right wing chum.
 
archives said:
What you forgot to mention, or maybe your sources never told you, the State Department was one of nine agencies that signed off on the deal, so I guess in your narrative she just bought out the other eight individuals. And to make your case even more ridiculous is that the uranium never left the US

The next two you have zero, none, no validation of causation, no proof of quid pro quo, pure inneundo based on circumstances

And the last one is the best, your telling us that the Clinton campaign paid the Russians for a phony dossier on Trump, do you realize how inane that is, what in the hell did they need the Russiams for to come up with a bogus file on Trump, if such was the case they could have made it themselves

Your "FACTS" were just destroyed, easily, just common sense
Click to expand...

So you say but you aren't a reliable source. Anyone whose sole support for a candidate involves skin color or having a vagina can hardly talk about facts.

Keep whining, son, your bitch lost and she isn't woman enough to accept it. Nor are you, cunt.
 
I Love America said:
When we bring up Uranium One it isn’t deflection or diversion or what aboutism.

I am unequivocally saying there is ZERO evidence of President Donald J Trump “colluding” with Russians to defeat Her Thighness. ZERO. ZILCH. NADA

However these are unassailable FACTS. IRREFUTABLE

1) Hillary Clinton was involved with the approval of the transfer of 20% of US uranium to Russia. You know the Russia the lefties have been telling us for the last year are the biggest threat to world peace. Even more than ISIS
2) Before the deal went through, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for a speech to a Russian bank involved in the deal
3) The Clinton Foundation was given MILLIONS prior to the deal being approved by those likely to benefit most from the deal
4) The Clinton Campaign/DNC paid $6-10 million to Fusion GPS to hire Steele to collide with Russians to defeat Donald Trump.

I have listed FOUR irrefutable facts about Clinton’s in bed with Russians.

Can libtards list anything specific about Trump and so called collusion? Nope. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

All they have is Manaforts supposed crimes a decade before he joined the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

1) How was Hillary Clinton involved? Did she vote to approve it? Who approved the sale? How many votes were there? Did HRC have a vote?
2) How long before the deal was Bill Clinton's speech?
3) What does the Clinton Foundation do with its money?
4) Evidence?
 
(CNN) FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Sunday the agency hasn't changed its opinion that Hillary Clinton should not face criminal charges after a review of new emails.

"Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July," Comey wrote in the new letter to congressional committee chairmen.
 
Micawber said:
(CNN) FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Sunday the agency hasn't changed its opinion that Hillary Clinton should not face criminal charges after a review of new emails.

"Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July," Comey wrote in the new letter to congressional committee chairmen.
Click to expand...

Even Bone Spur has agreed to that.
 
archives said:
What you forgot to mention, or maybe your sources never told you, the State Department was one of nine agencies that signed off on the deal, so I guess in your narrative she just bought out the other eight individuals. And to make your case even more ridiculous is that the uranium never left the US

The next two you have zero, none, no validation of causation, no proof of quid pro quo, pure inneundo based on circumstances

And the last one is the best, your telling us that the Clinton campaign paid the Russians for a phony dossier on Trump, do you realize how inane that is, what in the hell did they need the Russiams for to come up with a bogus file on Trump, if such was the case they could have made it themselves

Your "FACTS" were just destroyed, easily, just common sense
Click to expand...

ILA knows his ranting is a giant load of bullshit, but he's a troll, and trolls troll.

That's what he is and that's what he does.

Better to just ignore he and his ilk.
 
Look over there a shiny object, hillary, emails, benghazi...... Anywhere but @ the dirty & his dirty deeds...........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top