Lester Holt spins debate for Hillary

Birther gate is first on the list if you're trying to paint Trump as a racist.

Even though nobody can explain why questioning a birth certificate is racism.
 
Wow...so snorting, sniffling, and drinking water shows lack of stamina.....

you are desperate ain't you.....

He couldn't last the full debate and folded like a lawn chair in the second half. He babbled incoherently and had tortured facial expressions. Ill-prepared, ill-tempered, unknowledgeable. Low energy. Low stamina. Pathetic.
 
Journalists got their wish. Presidential debate moderator Lester Holt hoisted Hillary Clinton’s campaign high in the air like Atlas. Holt repeatedly called out Trump, as both the Clinton campaign and the liberal media had begged him to do.

Holt reminded viewers he’s liberal – from pushing the birther issue to harassing Trump about his tax returns to a wildly biased question about Clinton as “the first woman nominated by a party” not having “the look.” Clinton skated by with a 15-second response on her emails while Trump was asked repeated follow-up questions while Hillary was not. There was no “deplorables” question and Holt promoted the birther meme without noting its origin in the Clinton camp.

Clinton discussed fact-checking three times, even imploring her media friends: “Well, I hope the fact checkers are turning up the volume and really working hard.” Holt sure was. He dragged the debate to the left in six major ways:

1) Jobs: Holt pressed Trump with two questions on how he was going to add jobs even though the first answer discussed renegotiating trade deals.

2) Taxes: He portrayed the tax plans from the left – Clinton wanting to tax the rich and Trump “calling for tax cuts for the wealthy,” forcing Trump to correct him.

3) Tax Returns: Trump got hit hard with tax return questions for “business conflicts” while Hillary got a slide on emails, her hidden speeches and Clinton Foundation business conflicts.


4) Birthers: Holt asked a “birther” question that lasted longer than Clinton’s email answer. He then added three separate follow-ups to jam up Trump.

5) Iraq: He hammered Trump for supporting the Iraq War, downplaying how Hillary had voted to do the same. Nothing on Libya.

6) Hillary’s Gaffe: When asked about biased policing, Clinton said, “I think implicit bias is a problem for everyone, not just police.” Holt ignored it, rather than challenge the idea everyone is bigoted.

The New York Times said Holt “Opted for Restraint,” and called him a “minimalist moderator.” The paper liked some of Holt’s approach, given the “news media tempest over how aggressively a moderator should fact check candidates.” Still, the Times called it “a split decision” for Holt.

USA Today summed it up with the magic words: “Holt fact-checked Trump.” Right-leaning HeatStreet called Holt the “third debater.” Media Research Center President L. Brent Bozell III (Hint: My boss), said, “Holt failed in his role as a moderator. Period

The news media have been shouting “fact check” in desperate cries for relevance. More than a dozen outlets fact-checked the debate as a result. CNN Reliable Sources host Brian Stelter, also of the Times, focused on the strategy Sunday show to target Trump. “Does a unique candidate like Donald Trump require a different kind of moderating?” he asked before being told, “No, no absolutely not,” by long-time debate moderator Jim Lehrer.

Journalists have demanded their industry give up neutrality throughout the campaign. It’s a laughable conceit for anyone who recalls Candy Crowley’s 2012 bias or the 2016 CNBC GOP primary debate. Univision anchor Jorge Ramos turned from journalist to crusader with barely any professional criticism. Reporters might as well wear blue jerseys with “I’m With Her” on the back.

Back in August, Times media columnist Jim Rutenberg argued the paper had to sacrifice its alleged neutrality. If you think “Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies,” then “you have to throw out the textbook American journalism,” he wrote.

By Monday, that had escalated into an industry-wide demand for debate moderators to attack Trump misstatements. As Rutenberg explained, that would “require the debate moderators to interject with the truth.”

Journalists have skewered anyone soft on Trump. NBC' the "Today" show’s Matt Lauer faced a “Storm of Criticism Over Clinton-Trump Forum” because he didn’t play the fact-check game. Even "Tonight Show" host Jimmy Fallon was bashed for mussing Trump’s hair instead of smacking him upside the head.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016...lary-6-huge-ways-plays-gotcha-with-trump.html

Waaaaaaaaa!
 
Birther gate is first on the list if you're trying to paint Trump as a racist.
Even though nobody can explain why questioning a birth certificate is racism.
it's ridiculous.
it's purely political.it wouldn't have been so egregious if I weren't for the other softballs to Clinton; while avoiding real issues
 
I don't either. I do mind calling Trump on his birther bullshit, while ignoring Clinton on her Emails.It's biased moderation.
( and why nothing about terrorism? immigration? etc...I mean really birthers is WAY down the list of national concerns


I'm not sure we're talking the same thing. Repatriation means bring foreign profits back to US based conglomerates by reducing taxes

TPP was headed for fast tracking!! That means it takes a 2/3 Override to stop passage it'san international executive agreement
and if Congress were to bring it up ( at least before Bernie fer sure) it would pass. It might still pass now, but it's not going to the floor.

Clinton called it the "gold standard" and the sections were well understood before finalization.
Once again she shape-shifted, got away with it, and Holt just lets it pass
( and even her language there was more lies - she never said "hope it was the gold standard")

Of course I recall. Those stupid yellow ribbons stampeding us to war.
Clinton voted for the war, and she had much more info (National Intel Estimates)the Trump did with his offhand remarks to Howard Stern.
Clinton never met a war she didn't want in on ( including Bosnia/Libya/Syria)
JFC. Just Google what I told you to.
What do you think a tax holiday is?
Now you're defending the intentionally bogus intel Bush gave to Congress? Gee...what were you saying about that in '08, when you were pro Hillary?
 
He couldn't last the full debate and folded like a lawn chair in the second half. He babbled incoherently and had tortured facial expressions. Ill-prepared, ill-tempered, unknowledgeable. Low energy. Low stamina. Pathetic.
And it worked so well...he says he has to be 'tougher' on her in the next debate.

Hmm....maybe he should just do a little research, instead of practicing 'yo mamma so fat' jokes?
 
JFC. Just Google what I told you to.
What do you think a tax holiday is?
Now you're defending the intentionally bogus intel Bush gave to Congress? Gee...what were you saying about that in '08, when you were pro Hillary?
you need to do some research. the official title of 'National Intelligence Estimate" in regard to the Iraq war is this:

Iraq: Status of WMD Programs http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/iraq-war-wmds-donald-rumsfeld-new-report-213530
it shows *recently declassified* that there were giant holes in those bogus estimates.
But she would have had to go and read the report -the same one the Intelligence member Senate Committee got.

Did she do so? No. she went with an administrative summary. she wasn't alone, but she had access to it when Trump did not.
 
What did she lie about? 'Hoping' it was the gold standard?

6 fact checks, on dozens of lies?
that's a big one. I'd have to check the rtanscripts. but that changes her entire denial.

The bigger thing is Holt didn't hold her accountable for any thing -especially the Email ( talk about lies!)
yet went after Trump on minutia, like stop and frisk being unconstitutional ( it was not appealed -yet Holt saw fit to jump in)

Holt was severely bad, the worst ever
 
Last edited:
Back
Top