less gun deaths in England

but it doesn't stop people from being defenseless.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...ight-in-mcdonald-s-shot-dead-115875-23075797/

A DAD-of-four who split up a fight in a McDonald’s was shot dead moments after being told he wouldn’t see the morning.

Raymond Mitchell, 34, had only popped into the restaurant to buy a hot chocolate.
Advertisement >>

But he apparently caused offence after splitting up two men fighting in the queue.

One of them, who had several gold teeth, shouted at Raymond: “You are gonna die tonight, you are not gonna see the morning.”

The thug is then said to have phoned an accomplice to fetch a gun, yelling into his mobile: “Bring me that thing.”

Raymond left the 24-hour McDonald’s but was chased into a cul-de-sac. The gun was then delivered and Mr Mitchell was beaten and pistol-whipped before being shot three times in an alley in Brixton, South London, at 6.50am on Sunday. Raymond, nicknamed Brown, was taken to hospital but died hours later.

Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...ld-s-shot-dead-115875-23075797/#ixzz1L3LGFYPu
Go Camping for 95p! Vouchers collectable in the Daily and Sunday Mirror until 11th August . Click here for more information

hows that gun free zone working topspin?
 
but it doesn't stop people from being defenseless.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...ight-in-mcdonald-s-shot-dead-115875-23075797/


hows that gun free zone working topspin?

Full justification to arm every man, woman and child in the UK. Yup, you certainly have an argument.

BTW It's FEWER not less for countable nouns. 1 death, 2 deaths, 100 deaths, FEWER deaths.
Education is uncountable so it is correct to say that you have received less education than most six year olds. Not THAT much smarter, old bean.
 
Smarter than Few wants everybody armed. That way, he thinks he won't feel quite so inadequate.



girl_gun.JPG
 
I guess you and your pal STF were too busy oiling each other's receivers to get the memo.
 
grammar nazis abound when the argument is unbeatable.

Well the only way to debate on a forum such as this is by the use of language. If you cannot use your own language adequately then your arguments will be ignored or derided. Now, if that is what you want all you need to do is tell us.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807440 said:
I guess you and your pal STF were too busy oiling each other's receivers to get the memo.

classic example of someone who has no cogent point or argument, whip out a sexual reference. we actually call that projection.
 
classic example of someone who has no cogent point or argument, whip out a sexual reference. we actually call that projection.

"We" being those who fantasize about sex when a routine gun maintenance procedure is mentioned? Hmmmm.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807583 said:
"We" being those who fantasize about sex when a routine gun maintenance procedure is mentioned? Hmmmm.
Who might that be? All the gun owners on this particular board are married.
 
what it does show is that gun control is a failure. It keeps decent people defenseless while it does nothing to prevent someone with murderous intent from obtaining a handgun.

Bullshit, there is no groundswell of people in this country demanding to be armed. You are trying desperately to make something out of nothing.
 
Bullshit, there is no groundswell of people in this country demanding to be armed. You are trying desperately to make something out of nothing.
That's not the argument presented. Whether people demand to be armed or not (and there is a small movement in Britain that demands just that), is inconsequential as to whether or not gun control actually works.
 
That's not the argument presented. Whether people demand to be armed or not (and there is a small movement in Britain that demands just that), is inconsequential as to whether or not gun control actually works.

Laws prohibiting theft, murder and rape don't "work" either, do they? Now, apply your logic to those behaviors.
 
Back
Top