less gun deaths in England

¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807728 said:
I propose the same thing I proposed earlier.

Gunlovers need to quit wetting their panties about alleged 'secret plots' to snatch guns.

"Americans right now live in a country that is taxed less and has fewer restrictions on gun ownership than it did under George W. Bush."​
So because gun owners are being vigilante you are pissed off? The past few years have been good to gun owners, but the attitude of enforcement agencies such as the DOJ and ATF leaves much to be desired. Both those are executive offices which means that they can bypass congress and the USSC to a fairly large degree. Additionally the 2 recent court decisions (Heller and McDonald) were won by one justice; Kennedy. With Obamas recent court appointments, it is almost certain that if a pro gun justice were to retire or die, a anti would be put in their place. So by no means whatsoever should gun owners relax their guard. Just because Obama hasn't made any moves on gun control (and aside from his executive appointments he hasn't) doesn't mean that he may not in the future.
 
Last edited:
So because gun owners are being vigilante you are pissed off?

I'm laughing. Does it seem like I'm angry?

BTW, did you mean "vigilant"?

I only ask because when big brave gunlovers go "vigilante" they get arrested.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807732 said:
I'm laughing. Does it seem like I'm angry?

BTW, did you mean "vigilant"?

I only ask because when big brave gunlovers go "vigilante" they get arrested.
You're remarks certainly wouldn't characterize those of a calm individual. And yes I meant Vigilant, not vigilante.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807722 said:
Well, King of Wolverine Wusses, now it seems that your fright and being scared have morphed from 'being prepared for a possibility' to 'slighty worrying'.

You're really not too good at this debating thing, are you?

Maybe you and your fellow witless Wolverine Wussies should stick to blasting Hamm's cans off fence posts and fantasizing about 'armed rebellion'.



:lol:​

yeah, you just lost again
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807742 said:
Your misperceptions aren't my problem, are they?
Explain again how being watchful is a misconception.
EDIT: Nevermind, I see what you meant. But considering that you're a known troll, and that we all are dealing with the limited expression of text, it's a fair assumption and if you would wish to avoid it in the future then you'd probably wish to change your way of presenting yourself.
 
How's that 'revolt against government tyranny thing' coming, Smarter Than Few?

Resisted any unconstitutional actions today?
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807752 said:
How's that 'revolt against government tyranny thing' coming, Smarter Than Few?

Resisted any unconstitutional actions today?
Where did he call for a revolution against the government?
 
Explain again how being watchful is a misconception.
EDIT: Nevermind, I see what you meant. But considering that you're a known troll, and that we all are dealing with the limited expression of text, it's a fair assumption and if you would wish to avoid it in the future then you'd probably wish to change your way of presenting yourself.

You mean 'known' by Yurt & Co. who see trolls under his bed, probably. LOL!
 
According to people like this, I guess.


21a66bdc56.jpg
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;807752 said:
How's that 'revolt against government tyranny thing' coming, Smarter Than Few?

Resisted any unconstitutional actions today?

nobody has been fool enough to try any. how many badges have you blown lately?
 
nobody has been fool enough to try any. how many badges have you blown lately?

Since you "call that projection" - by "we" you meant you and your gay cop top?

classic example of someone who has no cogent point or argument, whip out a sexual reference. we actually call that projection.

When everyone else pwns Smarter Than Few, it's hilarious.


When he pwns himself, it's priceless.

:lol:​
 
Back
Top