Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Then don't report it to the police if it happens.

The parents of the molested child in this case felt differently, they did report it, it is a crime, and now some liberals are pretending they committed a hate crime.

^^^ This.

This seems to be something that's being forgotten. The parents of the underage girl have a right to seek assistance in having these sexual crimes against their daughter cease and desist.

Try to imagine a national movement being underway to take away the government's assistance in ceasing criminal sexual activity against your underage daughter.
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Hunt violated her pretrial conditions by contacting the girl identified as the victim in the case.

Prosecutors say Hunt exchanged thousands of texts with the girl and sent her nude photos.

Prosecutors also alleged Hunt's mother, Kelly Hunt Smith, texted the alleged victim and urged her to delete "everything" so no one would find out the girl and Hunt had spoken.

Assistant State Attorney Chris Taylor said in court Tuesday that within days of the court's no contact order, Hunt began contacting the alleged victim in the case, the paper reports. The younger girl's parents reportedly found out, leading to an investigation and Tuesday's hearing.

Sheriff's Detective Jeremy Sheppard testified during the hearing about the abundance of electronic evidence obtained and told the court that Hunt and the younger girl had physical contact on July 29.

"The evidence is overwhelming," Circuit Court Judge Robert Pegg said before revoking the teen's bond.

Hunt's father has publicly claimed that the girl's parents went to police because they blamed Hunt for their child's homosexuality.

Since Hunt's arrest, the case has garnered national attention for what some say is a gay rights issue. Advocacy groups including the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida argue that older high schoolers dating their younger counterparts is an innocuous, everyday occurrence that is not prosecuted - regardless of sexual orientation - and not a crime on par with predatory sex offenses.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_...ip-to-remain-in-jail-until-trial-judge-rules/

It's not a gay rights issue....I disagree with my liberal brethren on that. It is a statutory rape issue.

It does however, show the immaturity of the defendant. And I do agree with the ACLU that it is not on par with predatory sex offenses. I do believe she deserves to be punished....just as a heterosexual relationship under the same situation would be.
 
Yet many on the left are miscasting this as a gay rights issue.

Make you wonder.

And if the molester will violate a court order so blatantly, I think "predator" is apt.
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Yet many on the left are miscasting this as a gay rights issue.

Make you wonder.

And if the molester will violate a court order so blatantly, I think "predator" is apt.

How about a very young person in love with an even younger person?
 
How about a very young person in love with an even younger person?

How sweet and innocent. After being charged with a sex crime, the predatory molester stalked her young victim with thousands of texts, sent her nude photos, and had physical contact with her despite a court order and the wishes of the victims parents?

No undue influence there?
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

How sweet and innocent. After being charged with a sex crime, the predatory molester stalked her young victim with thousands of texts, sent her nude photos, and had physical contact with her despite a court order and the wishes of the victims parents?

No undue influence there?

Were those texts unwelcome?.....oh....I know they were by the authorities and the parents....but by the girl herself?

And make no mistake, I know it was wrong....and for oh....I don't know....the 10-15th time....I am not defending the 18 year old's actions.

I am simply saying that teenage foolishness does not constitute predatory behavior. That's like saying all young people who get drunk out of their skulls are chronic alcoholics and should be.labeled as such for the rest of their lives.
 
I meant rhetorically, as in imagine if it was your daughter, or my daughter.... how would *we* feel?
The sense of helplessness.

Do liberals feel that the wishes of the parents and the law count for nothing as long as the molester is lesbian or gay and the minor victim is supposedly willing to be violated?

A minor child cannot legally decide whether or not texts or sexual molestation is "welcome" or not.
 
Do liberals feel that the wishes of the parents and the law count for nothing as long as the molester is lesbian or gay and the minor victim is supposedly willing to be violated?

A minor child cannot legally decide whether or not texts or sexual molestation is "welcome" or not.

Isn't that liberal modus operandi though? Doesn't "equality" usually really mean "special privilege"?

Orwell? Animal Farm? We've seen it all before.
 
Liberals have tried to normalize pedophilia before, haven't they?

in 1990, the Journal of Homosexuality produced a special double issue devoted to adult-child sex, which was entitled "Male Intergenerational Intimacy" (1). One article said many pedophiles believe they are "born that way and cannot change" (p. 133). Another writer said a man who counseled troubled teenage boys could achieve "miracles... not by preaching to them, but by sleeping with them." The loving pedophile can offer a "companionship, security and protection" which neither peers nor parents can provide (p. l62). Parents should look upon the pedophile who loves their son "not as a rival or competitor, not as a thief of their property, but as a partner in the boy's upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home..." (p. 164).

A British university professor wrote: "Boys want sex with men, boys seduce adult men, the experience is very common and much enjoyed" (p. 323). A professor of social science at the State University of New York says he looks forward to the day when Americans will "get over their hysteria about child abuse" (p. 325) and child pornography.

http://www.narth.com/docs/pedophNEW.html
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Isn't that liberal modus operandi though? Doesn't "equality" usually really mean "special privilege"?

Orwell? Animal Farm? We've seen it all before.

Oh...you're going to cite works of fiction to prove your point? I guess Stephen King Novels prove the existence of....werewolves, haunted cars, possessed trucks etc....
 
A columnist who was formerly sympathetic to the lesbian molester has "seen the light":



Here's a lesson everyone needs to learn. Don't violate a court order. It will only make your problems worse.

There is never an acceptable excuse for going against what a judge has ordered. Not even if you think it is unfair. Not even if it's a matter of the heart. Not long ago, I wrote a column — actually, a rather sympathetic column — about the plight of Florida teenager Kaitlyn Hunt

At 17, Hunt's high school sweetheart was just 14 and female. Because Florida's statutory rape law stipulates that no one under 16 can legally consent to sexual contact, Hunt was expelled from her high school where she had been an excellent student and athlete.

In mid-February, Hunt was charged with two felony counts of lewd and lascivious behavior with a minor. Circuit Court Judge Robert Pegg issued a no-contact order instructing her to have no further contact with the younger girl.

I felt badly for the young sweethearts, remembering that awkward teen-time when I first thought I was "in love." I suggested we might want to rethink current laws, given the inevitability of teens experimenting with sex. Yes, even same-sex relationships.

Now, I realize I've been had. Along with the rest of the media, I believed Hunt's parents and their assertion that their daughter was just 17 and simply going where her wholesome little lovesick heart took her. Turns out she was actually 18 when she first had sexual contact with the 14-year-old.

I finally got my hands on the actual arrest affidavit, and there was Hunt's date of birth: 8-14-1994, and she is clearly described as being 18 years old when she took the younger girl into a stall inside a school restroom and engaged in sexual activity. (Most of the report includes language and descriptions of activities not fit for a family newspaper.) Hunt even told the arresting officer that the relationship had begun nearly three months after her birthday.

Look, there's no magic about an 18th birthday in terms of a person's maturity level, but the law has to draw the line of adulthood somewhere. So, why would Hunt's parents lie about the age difference? They must have realized the legal implications of 17 versus 18.

Maybe that's why they launched a distracting PR blitz after Hunt's arrest that stressed she was a sort of poster-person hero of gay discrimination. They exclaimed to reporters that Hunt was actually a victim of the other girl's "bigoted" parents, who had maliciously reported her to police for "turning their daughter gay."

That wasn't true, either. Those parents denied the charge in TV interviews, saying Hunt had twice been warned to stay away, and they had contacted police as a "last resort."

No one realized that all the while the controversy bubbled around her, Hunt was hiding a monumental secret.

The Hunts kept up the drumbeat that every adult involved was ill-informed, insensitive and politically incorrect in their handling of the case. They appealed to gay activists to join their fight. The American Civil Liberties Union agreed to help the Hunts. A "SaveKate" Facebook page cropped up. More than 300,000 supporters signed an online petition urging prosecutors to drop the charges. No one talked much about that Florida law that declared a 14-year-old unable to consent to sex.

At the same time, the Hunts were flooding the media with pretty, posed headshots of their wide-eyed and smiling daughter, the innocent-looking Hunt was busy thumbing her nose at Pegg's no-contact order. How?

Just two weeks after that order was issued, she secretly slipped the younger girl an iPod and began sending her an almost constant stream of e-messages and lewd, nude photographs of herself. Prosecutors say they found that since March 1 Hunt had sent 20,000 text messages to the "child victim," including some that arranged secret face-to-face meetings. Court documents said the pair had sexual relations as recently as the end of July.

But that's not all. It turns out that Hunt's mother, Kelley Hunt Smith, part of the brain trust that decided it was smarter to play the gay discrimination card instead of advising her daughter to admit she had broken a law, was on record giving cover-up advice to her daughter's companion.

"Delete EVERYTHING," Smith wrote in a text message to the younger girl. "PLEASE delete everything and make sure NO ONE finds out you've spoken to Kate at all."

When all this new evidence was presented to Pegg, he was not amused. At a special hearing last week, he ordered the now 19-year-old Hunt to be held in jail until her unscheduled trial. He also added another new felony charge — transmitting material harmful to a minor by electronic equipment.

Too bad the Hunts never counseled their daughter to take the prosecutor's generous plea offer, which in return for Hunt's admission of guilt, ensured she would not serve jail time and waived the state's requirement that she register as a lifelong sex offender.

If you've got a teen in trouble with the law, do them a favor. Tell them to wipe the smirk off their face and take court proceedings very, very seriously. Tell them the story about Kaitlyn Hunt, and end with the fact that in addition to missing out on college and every other young adult pursuit, she now faces more than 15 years in prison.



http://www.noozhawk.com/article/diane_dimond_lesbian_kaitlyn_hunt_calamity_20130824
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Once again....where in ANY of my posts did I say that she shouldn't be punished? The difference between you and I is that you feel she should have a permanent "Scarlet letter" assigned to her and I don't
 
Once again....where in ANY of my posts did I say that she shouldn't be punished? The difference between you and I is that you feel she should have a permanent "Scarlet letter" assigned to her and I don't

She's an admitted sex offender and must register if convicted.
 
This article appears in the A.P.A.'s own prestigious Psychological Bulletin. It provides an overview of all the research studying the harm resulting from childhood sexual abuse.

The authors' conclusion? That childhood sexual abuse is on average, only slightly associated with psychological harm--and that the harm may not be due to the sexual experience, but to the negative family factors in the children's backgrounds. When the sexual contact is not coerced, especially when it is experienced by a boy and is remembered positively, it may not be harmful at all.

The authors of the article propose that psychologists stop using judgmental terms like "child abuse," "molestation," and "victims," using instead neutral, value-free terms like "adult-child sex." Similarly, they say we should not talk about the "the severity of the abuse," but instead refer to "the level of sexual intimacy."

The authors conclude that behavior which psychotherapists commonly term "abuse" may only constitute a violation of social norms. And science, they say, should separate itself from social-moral terminology. Religion and society, these writers argue, are free to judge behavior as they wish...but psychiatry should evaluate behavior by its own set of standards.

In fact, the authors of the Psychological Bulletin article propose what they consider may be a better way of understanding pedophilia: that it may only be "abuse" if the child feels bad about the relationship.

They are in effect suggesting a repetition of the steps by which homosexuality was normalized. In its first step toward removing homosexuality from the Diagnostic Manual, the A.P.A. said the condition was normal as long as the person did not feel bad about it.

Few laymen are aware that the American Psychiatric Association redefined the criteria for pedophilia. According to their diagnostic manual (DSM--IV), a person no longer has a psychological disorder simply because he molests children.

To be diagnosed as disordered, now he must also feel anxious about the molestation, or be impaired in his work or social relationships.

Thus the A.P.A. has left room for the "psychologically normal" pedophile.


http://www.narth.com/docs/pedophNEW.html
 
Back
Top