Lefty ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Paid White Supremacist To Plan Infamous Charlottesville Rally: Indictment

volsrocks

volsrocks

Verified User
An informant who was paid by the Southern Poverty Law Center helped white supremacists plan the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, according to the Justice Department.

In an indictment made public on Tuesday, the SPLC stands accused of secretly using donors’ money to pay leaders within racist groups. One of the SPLC’s informants was a member of the leadership team of a white supremacist group that planned the rally in Charlottesville, according to the Justice Department.

The informant, who was identified in the indictment as “field source 37” or “F-37,” was paid more than $270,000 by the SPLC between 2015 and 2023. The informant was part of a group chat created for those who were planning the “Unite the Right” rally, and the informant attended the rally “at the direction of the SPLC,” according to the department.



www.dailywire.com

Lefty ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Paid White Supremacist To Plan Infamous Charlottesville Rally: Indictment

An informant who was paid by the Southern Poverty Law Center helped white supremacists plan the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, according to the Justice Department.In an indictment made public on Tuesday, the SPLC stands accused of secretly using donors’...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com



All theater planned and paid for by the left
 
volsrocks said:
An informant who was paid by the Southern Poverty Law Center helped white supremacists plan the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, according to the Justice Department.

In an indictment made public on Tuesday, the SPLC stands accused of secretly using donors’ money to pay leaders within racist groups. One of the SPLC’s informants was a member of the leadership team of a white supremacist group that planned the rally in Charlottesville, according to the Justice Department.

The informant, who was identified in the indictment as “field source 37” or “F-37,” was paid more than $270,000 by the SPLC between 2015 and 2023. The informant was part of a group chat created for those who were planning the “Unite the Right” rally, and the informant attended the rally “at the direction of the SPLC,” according to the department.



www.dailywire.com

Lefty ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Paid White Supremacist To Plan Infamous Charlottesville Rally: Indictment

An informant who was paid by the Southern Poverty Law Center helped white supremacists plan the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, according to the Justice Department.In an indictment made public on Tuesday, the SPLC stands accused of secretly using donors’...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com



All theater planned and paid for by the left
Click to expand...
Already a thread on this. The police and the FBI have used paid informants too.
 
Southern Poverty Law Center IS NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT


Paying someone to rob a bank is not being an informant, paying them to rob the bank is conspiracy to rob. They are principals in the crime. Same here.
 
volsrocks said:
An informant who was paid by the Southern Poverty Law Center helped white supremacists plan the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, according to the Justice Department.

In an indictment made public on Tuesday, the SPLC stands accused of secretly using donors’ money to pay leaders within racist groups. One of the SPLC’s informants was a member of the leadership team of a white supremacist group that planned the rally in Charlottesville, according to the Justice Department.

The informant, who was identified in the indictment as “field source 37” or “F-37,” was paid more than $270,000 by the SPLC between 2015 and 2023. The informant was part of a group chat created for those who were planning the “Unite the Right” rally, and the informant attended the rally “at the direction of the SPLC,” according to the department.



www.dailywire.com

Lefty ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Paid White Supremacist To Plan Infamous Charlottesville Rally: Indictment

An informant who was paid by the Southern Poverty Law Center helped white supremacists plan the infamous “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, according to the Justice Department.In an indictment made public on Tuesday, the SPLC stands accused of secretly using donors’...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com



All theater planned and paid for by the left
Click to expand...
NO, they didn't.
 

🧾 Summary of the Daily Wire article​

Read the original article

The article reports on a 2026 U.S. Department of Justice indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Its main claims:

  • The DOJ alleges the SPLC paid informants inside white supremacist groups using donor funds.
  • One informant (“F-37”) was:
    • Paid over $270,000 (2015–2023)
    • Involved in planning the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville
    • Participated in group chats, made racist posts, and helped coordinate logistics
  • The article emphasizes that the informant:
    • Attended the rally “at the direction of the SPLC”
  • It frames the rally as a major political event, noting:
    • It turned deadly when a white supremacist killed a counter-protester in a car attack
👉 The article’s core implication:
An “anti-hate” organization (SPLC) may have indirectly contributed to organizing extremist activity through paid informants.

🧠 What other sources confirm (important context)​

More neutral outlets (AP, Washington Post) report similar basic facts of the indictment, but with added nuance:

  • The DOJ alleges SPLC paid over $3 million to informants in extremist groups (AP News)
  • These informants included people connected to:
  • SPLC’s defense:
    • Payments were for intelligence gathering and safety monitoring, a long-standing practice
    • The indictment is politically motivated (The Washington Post)
👉 Crucially:

  • The case is allegations in an indictment, not proven facts.
  • There is dispute over whether informants were “helping” extremism or infiltrating it.

⚖️ Bias and framing analysis​

1) Loaded language​

The Daily Wire article uses emotionally charged wording:

  • “Lefty ‘Anti-Hate’ Group”
  • Emphasis on hypocrisy and political framing
This signals ideological positioning rather than neutral reporting.

2) Selective emphasis​

The article:

  • Highlights the most damaging interpretation (SPLC helped plan the rally)
  • Downplays or omits:
    • SPLC’s explanation (informants used for intelligence)
    • The broader, common use of informants in law enforcement contexts
This is a form of selection bias.

3) Lack of uncertainty framing​

  • The indictment is presented in a way that can feel like established fact, rather than allegations.
  • Neutral outlets explicitly emphasize:
    • “allegedly”
    • “according to prosecutors”
    • SPLC denial
The Daily Wire article leans toward certainty, which can mislead readers about the legal status.

4) Political narrative insertion​

The article adds:

  • Commentary about Democrats blaming Republicans for Charlottesville
This is not necessary to explain the indictment and serves to:

  • Reinforce a partisan narrative
  • Shift focus from legal facts to political context

5) What the article gets right​

To be fair:

  • The core factual claim (DOJ alleges an informant tied to Charlottesville planning was paid) is supported by other reporting.
  • The payment figure (~$270k) and informant role appear consistent with the indictment details.

🧩 Bottom line​

  • Accurate core:
    There is a DOJ indictment alleging SPLC paid informants, including one connected to the Charlottesville rally.
  • Where it’s misleading:
    • Frames allegations as near-certainties
    • Omits key counterpoints and context
    • Uses politically loaded language
    • Emphasizes the most scandalous interpretation
👉 A more neutral takeaway would be:

The DOJ alleges SPLC used paid informants inside extremist groups, including one linked to Charlottesville planning, but SPLC says this was intelligence work and denies wrongdoing. The claims are unproven and contested.
Click to expand...
 
volsrocks said:
View attachment 81881
Click to expand...
This image is a misleading meme, and the claim it makes is not supported by credible evidence.


Let’s break it into two parts:



1) “SPLC labeled Charlie Kirk a white supremacist”​


This is not accurate as stated.


  • The Southern Poverty Law Center has criticized Charlie Kirk’s organization (Turning Point USA) in past reports and commentary about the “hard right” ecosystem.
  • However, they have not formally classified Charlie Kirk himself as a “white supremacist” in any official designation system, and that phrasing is an exaggeration/misrepresentation of their reporting language.

In short:


Criticism exists, but the meme inflates it into a specific formal label that isn’t backed up by SPLC documentation.
Click to expand...


2) “SPLC secretly paid real white supremacists over $3 million”​


This is false and misleading, based on a distortion of a real legal settlement.


What actually happened:


  • The SPLC settled a defamation lawsuit with activist Maajid Nawaz and the Quilliam Foundation.
  • They paid about $3.375 million as part of a settlement after wrongly listing Nawaz in a “hate/extremism” context.
  • Nawaz is not a white supremacist—he is a British Muslim reform activist.

So what the meme does:


  • Takes a defamation settlement
  • Reframes it as “paying white supremacists”
  • Changes the meaning entirely

That is not what the case was about.



🧾 Bottom line​


  • ❌ No evidence SPLC “secretly pays white supremacists”
  • ❌ No formal SPLC designation of Charlie Kirk as a white supremacist
  • ⚠️ The meme mixes a real legal settlement with false labeling and exaggeration

 
Grim Reaper said:
This image is a misleading meme, and the claim it makes is not supported by credible evidence.


Let’s break it into two parts:



1) “SPLC labeled Charlie Kirk a white supremacist”​


This is not accurate as stated.


  • The Southern Poverty Law Center has criticized Charlie Kirk’s organization (Turning Point USA) in past reports and commentary about the “hard right” ecosystem.
  • However, they have not formally classified Charlie Kirk himself as a “white supremacist” in any official designation system, and that phrasing is an exaggeration/misrepresentation of their reporting language.

In short:





2) “SPLC secretly paid real white supremacists over $3 million”​


This is false and misleading, based on a distortion of a real legal settlement.


What actually happened:


  • The SPLC settled a defamation lawsuit with activist Maajid Nawaz and the Quilliam Foundation.
  • They paid about $3.375 million as part of a settlement after wrongly listing Nawaz in a “hate/extremism” context.
  • Nawaz is not a white supremacist—he is a British Muslim reform activist.

So what the meme does:


  • Takes a defamation settlement
  • Reframes it as “paying white supremacists”
  • Changes the meaning entirely

That is not what the case was about.



🧾 Bottom line​


  • ❌ No evidence SPLC “secretly pays white supremacists”
  • ❌ No formal SPLC designation of Charlie Kirk as a white supremacist
  • ⚠️ The meme mixes a real legal settlement with false labeling and exaggeration

Click to expand...
Hilariously silly attempt to lie about what the SPLC did....just ridiculous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top