Leftist American Marxism's New Approach

Libhater

Verified User
After the failures of the Parish Riots of '68, the collapse of the USSR's socialist economy, the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the spectacle of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, and the reign of both Thatcher and Reagan, the Left was at a loss to say the least. To quote Mao, the long march through the institutions had to begin. Now, the Marxist Left knew they had to change strategies.

The Left retreated deep inside academic and deep inside cultish, paralyzing theories of radical relativity: deconstruction and postmodernism.

It worked: Cancel culture has hounded many into silence. Literary critics like Myra Jehlen (1980s), was taken aback to find her job was reduced to "stripping away the lie and expose the liar" when celebrating Western Culture. At that point, the grandmasters such as Hemingway, Emerson, Thoreau, and Shakespeare, were all being frog-walked off the dead-white-male plank. The attack on Western Culture generally, and men of European descent specifically, was underway.

The Left needs crimes, bad news, and demoralization, even when problems aren't there. Jussie Smollett had to make it up!

Marxism now turns to a new approach. The assumption is that capitalism must be destroyed, but this time, the indictment is over cultural crimes against the environment, against people "of color," and against women (the list has gotten longer). Old Marxism could attack all of Western Culture on the "Systemic" economic front.

"Systemic" yoked together with "intersectionality". Translation: Everyone is equally oppressed by capitalism.

And the spark needed for Leftists to spark this Marxist Revolution was George Floyd. Then we had cities burning, statues torn down, distrust in our police, the institutions of law and jurisprudence mocked, riots, looting, etc.

Every new progressive idea was to be tested. Every new variant of COVID, mask types, lockdown restrictions, every new take on sexual deviance, speech and language mandates, drag queen reading hour, gun restrictions, gas stove restrictions, E.V. car mandates, every massive taxation and redistribution scheme, every new end-of-the-world theory on climate or race, etc.

More of this Leftist Marxist Vocabulary; The linguistic outrage by these Marxists includes:

Privilege, homophobia, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, transphobia, TERF, patriarchy, imperialism, colonialism, the (white, straight) man, phallocentric, logocentric, Anthropocene, me too, hierarchical, whiteness, ableism, and many more.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/07/the_left_must_always_be_resisting.html


It doesn't bother me in the least to continue to take time to post these very instructional Marxist ideals to the many Leftists here who are having
a hard time understanding or accepting that they are indeed modern day Marxists.
 
What's the matter with this guy?

What is it about this forum that attracts witless clowns like him?
Or her or it as the case may be.

Any attempt to correct the fact that we may be the most socially regressive developed nation on the planet
is regarded to be a threat by subversive forces in our culture.

All efforts to retain the very worst features of our society are regarded as patriotic.

Libhater is an idiot with a forum,
and this is an example of what our First Amendment does not mean to protect.

If this were my forum,
Libhater would be excluded
simply because I felt like it.
 
What's the matter with this guy?

What is it about this forum that attracts witless clowns like him?
Or her or it as the case may be.

Any attempt to correct the fact that we may be the most socially regressive developed nation on the planet
is regarded to be a threat by subversive forces in our culture.

All efforts to retain the very worst features of our society are regarded as patriotic.

Libhater is an idiot with a forum,
and this is an example of what our First Amendment does not mean to protect.

If this were my forum,
Libhater would be excluded
simply because I felt like it.

A typical liberal who wants to silence those that don't agree with them.

Not surprising.
 
The left can only stay in power through fear and intimidation.

Ain’t the left’s media sources who are broadcasting and trending endlessly accounts of crime run rampant, border armageddons, children being brainwashed, and other “fear and intimidation” narratives
 
After the failures of the Parish Riots of '68, the collapse of the USSR's socialist economy, the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the spectacle of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, and the reign of both Thatcher and Reagan, the Left was at a loss to say the least. To quote Mao, the long march through the institutions had to begin. Now, the Marxist Left knew they had to change strategies.

The Left retreated deep inside academic and deep inside cultish, paralyzing theories of radical relativity: deconstruction and postmodernism.

It worked: Cancel culture has hounded many into silence. Literary critics like Myra Jehlen (1980s), was taken aback to find her job was reduced to "stripping away the lie and expose the liar" when celebrating Western Culture. At that point, the grandmasters such as Hemingway, Emerson, Thoreau, and Shakespeare, were all being frog-walked off the dead-white-male plank. The attack on Western Culture generally, and men of European descent specifically, was underway.

The Left needs crimes, bad news, and demoralization, even when problems aren't there. Jussie Smollett had to make it up!

Marxism now turns to a new approach. The assumption is that capitalism must be destroyed, but this time, the indictment is over cultural crimes against the environment, against people "of color," and against women (the list has gotten longer). Old Marxism could attack all of Western Culture on the "Systemic" economic front.

"Systemic" yoked together with "intersectionality". Translation: Everyone is equally oppressed by capitalism.

And the spark needed for Leftists to spark this Marxist Revolution was George Floyd. Then we had cities burning, statues torn down, distrust in our police, the institutions of law and jurisprudence mocked, riots, looting, etc.

Every new progressive idea was to be tested. Every new variant of COVID, mask types, lockdown restrictions, every new take on sexual deviance, speech and language mandates, drag queen reading hour, gun restrictions, gas stove restrictions, E.V. car mandates, every massive taxation and redistribution scheme, every new end-of-the-world theory on climate or race, etc.

More of this Leftist Marxist Vocabulary; The linguistic outrage by these Marxists includes:

Privilege, homophobia, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, transphobia, TERF, patriarchy, imperialism, colonialism, the (white, straight) man, phallocentric, logocentric, Anthropocene, me too, hierarchical, whiteness, ableism, and many more.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/07/the_left_must_always_be_resisting.html


It doesn't bother me in the least to continue to take time to post these very instructional Marxist ideals to the many Leftists here who are having
a hard time understanding or accepting that they are indeed modern day Marxists.

American Thinker

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/
 
The left can only stay in power through fear and intimidation.

Exactly right, and that is what describes Marxism and Leftist Communism to a tee. That fear and intimidation also includes
censoring and or cancelling anything or anyone who presents an opposing view to their anti American agenda that was
started by obama and now continues with this current disastrous dimwit-dem administration.
 
American Thinker

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/

No one gives a shit what you or any other useless outfit thinks about The American Thinker. Unlike the anti American Marxists like yourself
that would never, and could never give a reasonable response or debate to this factual OP, the dozens upon dozens of individual authors at this
highly intelligent American Thinker make the most clear and undeniable facts exposing Marxist leftist Americans as the most dangerous threat to
the American Democratic Republic.
 
American Thinker

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/

Overall I rate American Thinker completely biased as they always trash sites that don't fit their liberal agenda.

See how that works?
 
Overall I rate American Thinker completely biased as they always trash sites that don't fit their liberal agenda.

See how that works?

This isn't the first time this jokester and or other leftists here tried to trash The American Thinker. Of course the site is bias to the RIGHT side
of politics. But trashing the site is totally different and totally insignificant since the site is made up of dozens upon dozens of independent authors
who may very well have a differing opinion on any given subject then that of the CEO of the Thinker. So this Trumpet character just needs to skirt
any and all posts that go against his extreme leftist beliefs/ideology. He really has no other option than to avoid discussing the truth that the Dem
Party has turned into a Marxist regime.
 
All efforts to retain the very worst features of our society are regarded as patriotic.

LOL! Yeah fella, all efforts by you anti American Marxists who seek to retain the worst features of our society are anything but patriotic.
What those Leftist-Marxist features as presented in the OP are is just another sign of leftist anti Americanism. You're not suggesting that
its we Republicans/Conservatives who are engaged in this nation dividing Marxist culture war, as presented in the OP, are you?
 
No one gives a shit what you or any other useless outfit thinks about The American Thinker. Unlike the anti American Marxists like yourself
that would never, and could never give a reasonable response or debate to this factual OP, the dozens upon dozens of individual authors at this
highly intelligent American Thinker make the most clear and undeniable facts exposing Marxist leftist Americans as the most dangerous threat to
the American Democratic Republic.
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:

This coming from the low IQ anti American fascist, is just hilarious.
 
This is the central argument:

Marxism now turns to a new approach. The assumption is that capitalism must be destroyed, but this time, the indictment is over cultural crimes against the environment, against people "of color," and against women (the list has gotten longer). Old Marxism could attack all of Western Culture on the "Systemic" economic front.


Putting aside the utter irrelevance to Marxism, is the argument here that "crimes" against the environment, against people of color and against women should be ignored or that they don't exist? The article is careful not to touch this question let alone answer and explain it.
 
Back
Top