LeBron James’ son Bronny, 18, suffers cardiac arrest during USC basketball workout

ExpressLane said:
Tall athletes frequently have coronary arteries that run in the cardiac muscle rather than on the surface of the heart muscle. That condition often leads to sudden cardiac arrest. (Len Bias) All gyms should have AEDs they are only a couple of thousand dollars and are very easy to use.
Click to expand...

snorting 1/3 cup of cocaine with your 3 pals (Len Bias) also is not great for the heart
 
Trump raped her. The judge clarified to make that clear. We can all say that and Trump cannot sue and win as it is established in law now.

The only thing anyone can argue is that NYS specifically has a technical definitional glitch where in law in THAT State the jury was forced to go with the lower finding simply because E Jean could not say for sure whether it was Trumps finger or penis that penetrated her. But that distinction is meaningless across the vast majority of the rest of the country where it is rape, regardless.

So across the vast majority of the country, it is accepted that Trump, by penetrating her (finger or penis) is rape, and thus we can properly call it rape.

Trump IS a rapist.
 
BTW i do love the Trumpderp and Trump himself arguments that ...


- the court established that i did penetrate her forcibly and against her will and it was either with my penis or finger, and as such they could not call it rape but did find it was sexual assault... WE WIN!



it is hilarious to me that Trump and his derps think the inability to establish whether it was a finger or penis when it DID happen, is a win. Every reporter and those challenging him for the primaries need to throw that right in his face, when he says he did not rape her.
 
domer76 said:
In their jurisdiction, rape is defined as penetration with a penis. That wasn’t the case. However, in many other jurisdictions, it is certainly rape. Nevertheless, the Trumpers will use the same rationalizations as they do when they claim he did not incite Jan. 6
Click to expand...

In Michigan the legal term used for "rape," "sexual assault," and "sexual battery" is Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC).
https://www.findlaw.com/state/michi...s in the process of committing another felony.

I was jury foreman in a criminal case in Michigan. They never used the term "rape."
 
volsrock said:
Not how it works


I can list many claims on here bout Trump that provided no proof


Claim Trump is a rapist....your proof
Click to expand...

Proof? You want proof?

Hmmmm.. Let me see if I can find a judge that oversaw a case that the jury found the evidence convincing enough to say it was proved that Trump is a rapist?
Oh.. wait.. That was almost too easy...


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.212.0.pdf

The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms.
Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.
Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York
Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New
York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the
vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not
called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”1
As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law
is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some
dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4
Click to expand...
Say it with me...

Trump is a rapist. The proof was accepted by a judge an jury.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Proof? You want proof?

Hmmmm.. Let me see if I can find a judge that oversaw a case that the jury found the evidence convincing enough to say it was proved that Trump is a rapist?
Oh.. wait.. That was almost too easy...


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.212.0.pdf


Say it with me...

Trump is a rapist. The proof was accepted by a judge an jury.
Click to expand...

Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.
Trump had “raped” her


She didnt prove it


the jury did not find that Carroll proved he raped her.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/carroll-trump-jury-deliberations/index.html
 
Last edited:
volsrock said:
At least I'm smart enough to know there are rape laws in this country and know the difference between rape and sex assault...u on the other hand are one fucking stupid fuck
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO. You are arguing that it was OK for Trump to attack her in a way that most people and dictionaries consider rape but then you argue it isn't rape because it doesn't meet the legal definition.

Do you use the same standard when it comes to Biden corruption? Is he not guilty of corruption since he has not acted in a way that meets the legal definition?
 
volsrock said:
Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.
Trump had “raped” her


She didnt prove it
Click to expand...

Are you calling the judge a liar?


The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms.
Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.
Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York
Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New
York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the
vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not
called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”1
As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law
is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some
dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4

The finding that Ms.
Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does
not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand
the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that
Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.212.0.pdf
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Are you calling the judge a liar?


The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms.
Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.
Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York
Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New
York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the
vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not
called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”1
As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law
is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some
dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4

The finding that Ms.
Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does
not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand
the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that
Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.212.0.pdf
Click to expand...


Judge says she did prove it ""JURY"""" says she didn't ,it was a JURY trial not trial by Judge doesn't MATTER what the Judge thinks or says!!!!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top