Leaked Document From 2018 Could Derail Trump’s Indictment

We may have just learned why Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has yet to indict former President Donald Trump despite a week of reports and speculation he would do so.

In a letter to federal authorities in 2018, and obtained by DailyMail.com, Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen denied receiving reimbursement from Donald Trump or his organization for making hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.

The letter was written on Cohen’s behalf by his attorney Stephen M. Ryan.

WhatsApp-Image-2023-03-22-at-5.01.25-PM.jpeg


This contradicts his recent testimony in front of a grand jury and could complicate prosecutors’ efforts to charge Trump with criminal activity related to the payments.

According to Cohen, Trump instructed him to pay $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to prevent her from revealing their alleged affair just days before the 2016 presidential election.

Fr21i-1WAAIIBaK


The grand jury session originally scheduled for today has been postponed, but prosecutors have requested the jurors return on Thursday with the possibility of one more witness.

The 2018 letter also contradicts his previous sworn testimony to Congress.


https://breaking911.com/bombshell-leaked-letter-from-2018-could-derail-trumps-indictment/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...hen-claiming-NOT-reimbursed-Donald-Trump.html

Cohen already admitted this way back when he was being tried and he recanted this ages ago, this isn't new. Why the fuck do you think he went to jail? He testified numerous times that trump had nothing to do with any payments. After recanting and providing evidence and emails it became obvious that he had been lying. Why do you think you find this bullshit on sites like these?
 
Copy and paste where I said I know anything about the facts of the case. I'll wait here. It's almost as if you retards are programmed to say certain things and can't shift from the script.

Would would ever accuse you of know a fact about anything?
 
My opinion sweetie, knowing that no one will attempt to charge a former president with a crime unless it's quite serious. I have posted this before, honey bunch.

You know what your opinion is worth don't you? I firmly believe a retarded leftists da like you have in ny would be more than willing to charge trump simply for the optics. What the fuck do you think the Russian collusion delusion was and the two impeachments? I swear you parasites would kill your own grandmothers if you thiught it would land trump in jail. You're not a daft whore you're a retarded one.
 
You know what your opinion is worth don't you? I firmly believe a retarded leftists da like you have in ny would be more than willing to charge trump simply for the optics. What the duck do you think the Russian collusion delusion was and the two impeachments. I swear you parasites would milk your grandmothers if you knew it would land trump I jail. You're not a daft whore you're a retarded one.

The Russian collusion was entirely factual, and Trumps AG lied his ass off to protect the President
 
The Russian collusion was entirely factual, and Trumps AG lied his ass off to protect the President

Oh course he did. lol. Is this another example of sometbjg being true because you "feel" it's true? Oh course it is. No use wasting time.
 
So you can't copy and paste where I made such a claim as you suggested. So in other words you are not a retarded whore you're a retarded lying whore.

I dont have access to every ID you use and every post you have made. I know your handlers could find it easily enough.
 
Hush money is not a crime...anywhere.

Why the fuck do you think a prosecutor in New York is about to charge Trump with a campaign violation. Do you think it's because they did not consult some ignorant fuckwad on an internet site to find out if it is a crime? Of course it can be a crime you fucking moron.
 
Oh course he did. lol. Is this another example of sometbjg being true because you "feel" it's true? Oh course it is. No use wasting time.

A number of Russians have come forward since then and admitted to it. Trump not being charged at the time does not mean he was innocent or that the charges were bogus.

Russian attempts to interfere in the election were first disclosed publicly by members of the United States Congress in September 2016, confirmed by US intelligence agencies in October 2016, and further detailed by the Director of National Intelligence office in January 2017.

According to the U.S. intelligence community, the operation—code named Project Lakhta[1][2]—was ordered directly by Russian president Vladimir Putin.[3][4] The Special Counsel's report, made public in April 2019, examined numerous contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials but concluded that there was insufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy or coordination charges against Trump or his associates.
This does not mean he was innocent, it means a prosecutor did not bring charges.
 
We already know Cohen is not a creditable witness.

On his words alone. Not an Internet lawyer like most JPP Trumpers, but witnesses need to be corroborated anyway in order to remove "reasonable doubt" for a conviction. In short, the DA has to back up Cohen's testimony with facts and evidence.
 
A number of Russians have come forward since then and admitted to it. Trump not being charged at the time does not mean he was innocent or that the charges were bogus.




This does not mean he was innocent, it means a prosecutor did not bring charges.

Then it was nothing but a leftist circle jerk.
 
Back
Top