HappensInteresting... In 2016 and 2020 when it was the Republican candidate getting ZERO votes in a polling district, it was just dismissed as how it is...
Zero votes in a precinct for a presidential candidate: It happens, and experts say it's not voter fraud
![]()
Zero votes in a precinct for a presidential candidate: It happens, and experts say it's not voter fraud
After the 2012 election results were final, some claimed that fraud was the only way to explain voting numbers in Philadelphia which showed Mitt Romney getting no votes at all in dozens of precincts in that city. But a review of election returns from all over the country shows that while such a...www.ajc.com
![]()
Both Sides Distort Incomplete Vote Counts to Falsely Suggest Election Fraud - FactCheck.org
Ballots were still being counted in the days following the 2024 election, but a claim that there was a suspicious gap of 15 million to 20 million votes as compared with the 2020 election has been circulating on social media. There is no such large gap -- states were still counting their ballots...www.factcheck.org
But, when it's a Democrat that receives zero votes in a polling district, there suddenly is obvious voter fraud or something going on and it's all legitimate to challenge the voting outcome...
You understand the green font, doncha?So no voter fraud against Kamala. Remind me what the purpose of this thread is?
We didn't say voter fraud in general wasn't a real thing. We said that trump's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were big fat lies. Learn the difference.But Libratards insist voter fraud isn't a real thing are they lying?
So no for Democrat voter fraud but yes for Republican voters fraud.We didn't say voter fraud in general wasn't a real thing. We said that trump's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were big fat lies. Learn the difference.
Do you want to relitigate all the court cases trump lost because of his false claims that the election was rigged?So no for Democrat voter fraud but yes for Republican voters fraud.
The vast majority were dismissed for standing.Do you want to relitigate all the court cases trump lost because of his false claims that the election was rigged?
That is not voter fraud. That would be evidence of election fraud. There is a difference.I thought there was no voter fraud?
Yeah, trump had crappy lawyers who didn't understand the basics.The vast majority were dismissed for standing.
So the districts that went 100% Democrat in 2020 weren't voter fraud. Isn't anything that illegally skews an election actually election fraud?That is not voter fraud. That would be evidence of election fraud. There is a difference.
You just nailed it.There's only voter fraud when trump loses, doncha know?
So no voter fraud against Kamala. Remind me what the purpose of this thread is?
Or activist judges. Like we have never seen that happen.Yeah, trump had crappy lawyers who didn't understand the basics.
Is this it ?Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Received Zero Votes in a New York County
"These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation," a statistician said
![]()
Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Received Zero Votes in a New York County
A lawsuit disputing the results of the 2024 election has moved forward after it was revealed that former Vice President Kamala Harris received no votes a New York county.www.latintimes.com
A lawsuit disputing the results of the 2024 election has moved forward after it was revealed that former Vice President Kamala Harris received no votes in a New York state district.
A seminal case calling the results of the presidential race as well as state senate races into question has advanced. The case refers to the results of the election in Rockland County, New York, with Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruling that a full hand recount must occur following the discovery.
The case's lead plaintiff is SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a non-partisan group that advocates for voting security and voter rights.
"There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely," Lulu Friesdat, founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement.
"If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election."
The complaint outlined how a number of voters relayed under sworn testimony that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet the Rockland County Board of Elections recorded fewer votes for Sare than should have been reported.
In addition to this, 331 voters in Rockland County NY district 35 reportedly chose Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand during the 2024 elections, but allegedly none of them continued to vote for Harris in the presidential election.
A similar incident occurred in Rockland County NY district 55, where 909 voters opted for Gillibrand but only two cast their votes for Harris.
Comparing the results of the 2024 election to the results collected in 2020, a statistician stated that the alleged results of the election in four out of the five towns making up Rockland County are "highly unlikely".
"These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity," said Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Surely not. Trump will just deport or kill the people doing the investigation.Is this it ?
It would be impossible to have a district go 100% in either direction by voter fraud. That would require election fraud. Voter fraud adds votes, and you cannot add votes to get to 100%.So the districts that went 100% Democrat in 2020 weren't voter fraud.
A lot of judges who were trump appointees...Or activist judges. Like we have never seen that happen.![]()
Link????A lot of judges who were trump appointees...
So voter fraud isn't election fraud?It would be impossible to have a district go 100% in either direction by voter fraud. That would require election fraud. Voter fraud adds votes, and you cannot add votes to get to 100%.
That is just logic.