Lauren "Groper" Boebert could cost GOP the House

Groper blames her vaping and jackass behavior on her Democratic boyfriend

“It’s always hard whenever there’s gravity put on the voters. I’m here to provide levity, and lift burdens off of people,” Boebert said in an interview with TMZ on Monday. “So anytime that they’re carrying mine, it’s something that you kind of feel deep inside.”

“But ultimately, all future date nights have been canceled. And I learned to check party affiliations before you go on a date,” Boebert — who filed for divorce from her husband in May — quipped, an apparent reference to reports that her date at the “Beetlejuice” performance is a Democrat.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehil...bert-breaks-it-off-with-beetlejuice-date/amp/
 
That's a given,
but if the same applies to her constituency,
how does it matter?

We have congressional districts in this country
with the dignity of amusement park fun houses.

Supposedly, Groper could in principle be prosecuted under Colorado's public lewdness laws.
 
Supposedly, Groper could in principle be prosecuted under Colorado's public lewdness laws.

We have public lewdness laws but no universal healthcare.
I obviously never learned how to prioritize like a proper American.

In any case, the young lady can do the Tijuana donkey act at the church picnic
and it's not stepping on my toes.

Her votes in congress are the real problem.
 
Lauren Boebert won her last election by fewer than 600 votes. Her vaping incident at Beetlejuice could doom her reelection bid and cost Republicans control of the House


https://www.businessinsider.com/lau...ocial&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=news-sf
It could (and likely will).

I suspect that the incident was a leftist set-up to take advantage of her vulnerability of freshly having gone through a divorce (kind of an odd guy for her to hook up with, eh?). Leftists have no shame in setting up and destroying people like that.

With that said, the suspected set-up doesn't excuse her overall behavior. I'm not talking about the hanky panky stuff (who doesn't like a little dark room hanky panky every now and then?), but I'm more-so referring to the vaping, the flash photography, and the other disruptive behavior that would've pissed me off if I was anywhere near where she was seated. The "do you know who I am?" card at the end is just icing on the cake.

I think she was set up, taken advantage of, and will now pay the price for it.
 
Supposedly, Groper could in principle be prosecuted under Colorado's public lewdness laws.
You suck at coming up with nicknames... Knowing her last name, you could at least refer to her as Lauren 'Groepert'. That would be more clever than 'Groper'.
 
We have public lewdness laws but no universal healthcare.

As I predicted when Democratic liars claimed that Obamacare would be the answer, it is never enough for you dumb, clueless Government loving leftists.

Universal healthcare isn't about health shit-for-brains. I spend a third of my time in Canada and can see firsthand what a failure it is.
 
We should start calling her Lauren Gropebert.

giphy.gif


giphy.gif
 
I spend a third of my time in Canada and can see firsthand what a failure it is.

Not adequate.
I wish that you'd spend ALL of your time in ash form someplace.

Canadian socialized medicine is similar to what Medicare for All would be over here--
public funding of private services.

What we need is

1. A UK style National Health Service--actual public services.
2. And equally important. An ideological cleansing of the population that would take your like out of the picture.

Bullshit Blob, the fact that you're completely unnecessary is beyond obvious.
You're only annoying, however, because I haven't gotten around yet to putting you back on ignore.
Let's take care of that now, shall we?
 
Back
Top