Latino Decisions tracking poll: Obama up by THIRTY-NINE POINTS

Superfreak said:
That is far easier to say than actually having to refute what I stated. But given you are a complete partisan, it is not shocking.
Click to expand...

Oh really? :0)

What party do I belong to and promote exclusively on this site?

Here's a clue .. I'm a Green .. and most here probably don't even know that.

Wrong again Al. :0)
 
1) It is not simply my opinion that Obama will have a harder time with turnout among his base groups that supported him in 2008

2) It is not simply my opinion that Obama might not have the Muslim voters support in the same percentages as he saw in 2008

3) It is a fact that Jewish voters are not a major block in the swing states

4) it is a fact that 96% of African Americans supported Obama in 2008... it is also a concern that he may not be able to get the turnout as high as he did in 2008.

5) It is also not simply my opinion that the youth vote is going to be hard to regenerate at 2008 levels.
 
blackascoal said:
Oh really? :0)

What party do I belong to and promote exclusively on this site?

Here's a clue .. I'm a Green .. and most here probably don't even know that.

Wrong again Al. :0)
Click to expand...

lol... i was being sarcastic... see how easy it is for someone to simply proclaim the other is 'partisan' rather than addressing their actual points.

in all seriousness, you are partisan... just not to one of the two major parties. Though you share a lot of similarities with Dems. As I do with Reps. But I am no more a Rep than you are a Dem.

Refute what I state if you can my friend. You may find it was not partisan at all.
 
Superfreak said:
lol... i was being sarcastic... see how easy it is for someone to simply proclaim the other is 'partisan' rather than addressing their actual points.

in all seriousness, you are partisan... just not to one of the two major parties. Though you share a lot of similarities with Dems. As I do with Reps. But I am no more a Rep than you are a Dem.

Refute what I state if you can my friend. You may find it was not partisan at all.
Click to expand...

Post the thread, comment, or inference where I said that other people should vote for Jill Stein.

Can't find it? :0)

The really BIG difference between you and I is that I attack Obama and the democrats better than you do .. but that doesn't mean that I should sit still and not also attack the party of stupid and their really ignorant candidates.

I have no dog in this presidential contest of warring corporatists. I get to call it as I see it .. and from where I sit, both you and Romney are desperate. :0)
 
Not to mention the fact that calling them 'tea baggers' is beneath you.
Click to expand...

They named themselves. Do you think that if you keep repeating it over and over people will suddenly 'forget' that and buy into your bullshit that 'teabagger' is a term Democrats assigned in order to be derogatory?

It isn't working, hasn't worked and won't work, so why don't you quit repeating the lie? Isn't that beneath you?

Perhaps not.
 
blackascoal said:
Post the thread, comment, or inference where I said that other people should vote for Jill Stein.

Can't find it? :0)

The really BIG difference between you and I is that I attack Obama and the democrats better than you do .. but that doesn't mean that I should sit still and not also attack the party of stupid and their really ignorant candidates.

I have no dog in this presidential contest of warring corporatists. I get to call it as I see it .. and from where I sit, both you and Romney are desperate. :0)
Click to expand...

So bottom line is that you cannot refute any of the points I made, instead you will continue to pretend that you are the only one that isn't a Dem or a Rep and that only you can provide insight into the two in a 'non-partisan' manner. Out of the two of us, you are the one displaying the partisan blinders...despite your proclamation that you are not partisan.

The fact that you continue with your rhetoric of 'the party of stupid' etc... shows that you are most indeed partisan.
 
Superfreak said:
So bottom line is that you cannot refute any of the points I made, instead you will continue to pretend that you are the only one that isn't a Dem or a Rep and that only you can provide insight into the two in a 'non-partisan' manner. Out of the two of us, you are the one displaying the partisan blinders...despite your proclamation that you are not partisan.

The fact that you continue with your rhetoric of 'the party of stupid' etc... shows that you are most indeed partisan.
Click to expand...

I like you brother .. but you are a partisan. I've refuted everything you've said.

How many posts have you made taking the Republican Party to task for their idiocy?

Did you refute Akin, or did you find "logic" in his claims?

I could go on .. but there would be no point.

“I’m just tired of the Republican Party being the ‘Stupid Party!’. Stupid people saying stupid things and scaring off independent voters and swing voters!”
-- Joe Scarborough

So now Scarborough is an Obama supporter?

Please .. spare me the false outrage.
 
Superfreak said:
Odd, I would suggest quite the contrary. The House has passed bills that focus on the economy and jobs, it is the Senate where they die.
Click to expand...

The House doesn't pass bills.

They pass "statements".

How about working with the other side and compromising in order to get something passed? The teabaggers in the House refuse to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top