Kyle Rittenhouse Marks Thanksgiving Promoting Violent Video Game Starring Himself

How about we just leave gays, transgenders, immigrants, etc. the fuck alone?

Who is trying to 'capitalize'? It is dangerous to be gay these days. Thanks to the hate. And I am not villifying Rittenhouse for what he did, but for WHAT HE IS DOING. Big difference. If someone posts here about Rittenhouse, you think it's my obligation to just ignore it? No chance.

What I do agree with you is that the right does not care about a person, only what that person can do for their cause. They place zero value on any human life except their own.

Fine with me. I think there are too many fucking busybodies telling others how to live their lives instead of minding their own fucking business.

It appears to be busybody political groups.

Agreed on "the right" and their lack of concern about others except themselves. Unfortunately, as you point out, there are lots of Lefties doing the same by the fact they seek to jam their views down the throats of anyone who disagrees.
 
Merely reporting on what an infamous character is doing now is hardly "hounding" him. It's just reporting. If he doesn't want to be reported about, then STFU and go to school like he claimed when he perjured himself. Ditto for the other fat murderboy, Zimmerman.

They should be paranoid. They're under close surveillance.

It keeps him in the news. Like Trump talking about corrupt election officials, where it only takes one nutjob to attack them, keeping Kyle in the news puts a target on his back as someone to be vilified as Concart pointed out: "he should be vilified".
 
It keeps him in the news. Like Trump talking about corrupt election officials, where it only takes one nutjob to attack them, keeping Kyle in the news puts a target on his back as someone to be vilified as Concart pointed out: "he should be vilified".

So if he's trying to capitalize on his infamy as a fat little murderboy by promoting violent videos or starting a YT channel to whine about what a victim he is, "the Left" is evil for reporting about it? What makes you think every media outlet reporting on the punk is "the Left" anyways? Or are you reverting to RWNJ "the MSM is liberal" mode now? lol
 
I agree, which is why I did not call half of Americans murderers, only fat little murderboy and his ilk. lol



Probably because everyone is an amateur photographer now, because we all carry cell phones, and people show up at energetic events like those protests just to film a little bit of history.

Libel.
 
Some of his ilk, yes. Specifically the WSEs who were watching from atop the garage that night and, IMO, running the drone.

Sure, everyone has a cell phone but when someone starts shooting, most people drop and take cover. How come there's no video of the night manager shooting his employees? The Colorado shooter?

You don't find it odd that militias weren't mentioned in the trial or that Kyle was left alone on the streets that night?

RQAA
 
The judge forbid quite a lot of testimony, including the stuff about the militia, fat murderboy consorting with them while out on bail -- including the infamous photos of him flashing WS signs. The judge did not want evidence presented that fat murderboy went there hoping to use the illegally-obtained gun, rather than the b.s. he said on the stand about being there as a "medic." State of mind has a lot to do with killing, as you know, but that was not allowed either. Do you really think "Kyle was left alone" by the militia assholes? It's far more likely that he got bored standing around with them and went down to go hunting. Oh excuse me, I mean "protecting." :rolleyes:

The civil lawsuit will be quite different.

What militia??? Void argument fallacy.
Libel.
 
It keeps him in the news. Like Trump talking about corrupt election officials, where it only takes one nutjob to attack them, keeping Kyle in the news puts a target on his back as someone to be vilified as Concart pointed out: "he should be vilified".

Mr. Tiny Penis, Back to Trump again?
The Rittenhouse case is settled science. If the game bothers anyone, don't buy the game.
 
The left wanted to have the satisfaction of seeing Rittenhouse murdered on the streets of kenosha before they even knew his name. Instead the kid ended up craniumating two of their own and blowing off part of the jerk off arm of another, The left fantasized about the kid being raped and killed in prison but instead he wore shirts that read FREE AS FUCK as drone footage and testimony proved his absolute and total innocense.


This has produced much seething and gnashing of teeth among the left. Meanwhile the kid is LHAO,... no doubt. :cool:
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile Kenosha is now the blueprint for stopping these protests and riots before they even begin like they did the day the kid was found innocent. A few well positioned shooters on roofs of businesses have a way of nipping these things in the bud BEFORE they start. ;) Thanks Good Men of Kenosha. Well done!
 
Last edited:
"Wisconsin is a Castle Doctrine state. This means that if you are in your home, car, or business there is a legal presumption deadly force can be used against a person if they have broken into, or are in the process of breaking into, one of these locations while you are present inside. " :)
 
"Wisconsin is a Castle Doctrine state. This means that if you are in your home, car, or business there is a legal presumption deadly force can be used against a person if they have broken into, or are in the process of breaking into, one of these locations while you are present inside. " :)

I doubt though if it is defined as "It's okay if you get someone to drive you to Wisconsin, give you a gun you cannot legally own, and you use it to kill protesters even if you're pretending to be defending a business that doesn't want your defense."

:rofl2:
 
I doubt though if it is defined as "It's okay if you get someone to drive you to Wisconsin, give you a gun you cannot legally own, and you use it to kill protesters even if you're pretending to be defending a business that doesn't want your defense."

:rofl2:

Not what I was talking about. I was talking about the good guys with guns on the roofs of businesses the day the verdict was announced.
 
I doubt though if it is defined as "It's okay if you get someone to drive you to Wisconsin, give you a gun you cannot legally own, and you use it to kill protesters even if you're pretending to be defending a business that doesn't want your defense."

:rofl2:
You can defend your own life from attack by others. And the court says that is EXACTLY what Rittenhouse did.
 
BTW.....You need far less good guys on rooftops then you would think when you leak their existence ahead of time to those who would do evil. Cant say as I blame the evil doers for standing down. Not many people are lining up to be the first to take one in the head ;) This is the way forward...:cool:
 
You wont find many home invasions in gun heavy Wisconsin. To say the least. The invaders are liable to take one in the chest from three different vantage points. Shit,....here the family dog is most likely packing TOO! woof woof! :laugh:
 
You wont find many home invasions in gun heavy Wisconsin. To say the least. The invaders are liable to take one in the chest from three different vantage points. Shit,....here the family dog is most likely packing TOO! woof woof! :laugh:
Not many home invasions in Texas either
 
We never had any pistols growing up. Their almost worthless in a real fight. Long guns. Gives you the opportunity to reach out and touch someone long before they even know youre there. Anybody remember any country anywhere ever storming the beaches with a pistol? Me neither! :laugh:
 
Back
Top