Krugman Monday

Is this the wave of the future? Will GOP radicalism towards the extreme right play out in the future nationally as it has done in California?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/01/opinion/krugman-lessons-from-a-comeback.html?_r=0

It is absolutely comical how - despite all the chest beating and self-righteous name-calling - not a single person has disputed Krugman's analysis.

Could it be that they cannot?

Does his logical conclusion frighten them so much they cannot bear to deal with it?
The point, however, is that these problems bear no resemblance to the death-by-liberalism story line the California-bashers keep peddling. California isn’t a state in which liberals have run wild; it’s a state where a liberal majority has been effectively hamstrung by a fanatical conservative minority that, thanks to supermajority rules, has been able to block effective policy-making.And that’s where things get really interesting — because the era of hamstrung government seems to be coming to an end. Over the years, California’s Republicans moved right as the state moved left, yet retained political relevance thanks to their blocking power. But at this point the state’s G.O.P. has fallen below critical mass, losing even its power to obstruct — and this has left Mr. Brown free to push an agenda of tax hikes and infrastructure spending that sounds remarkably like the kind of thing California used to do before the rise of the radical right.
And if this agenda is successful, it will have national implications. After all, California’s political story — in which a radicalized G.O.P. fell increasingly out of touch with an increasingly diverse and socially liberal electorate, and eventually found itself marginalized — is arguably playing out with a lag on the national scene too.
So is California still the place where the future happens first? Stay tuned.

Those without facts or logic may now recommence their name-calling.
:cool:
 
It is absolutely comical how - despite all the chest beating and self-righteous name-calling - not a single person has disputed Krugman's analysis.

Could it be that they cannot?

Does his logical conclusion frighten them so much they cannot bear to deal with it?


Those without facts or logic may now recommence their name-calling.
:cool:


All those "facts" are really just shit Krugman has been spouting for years and that has never worked: tax more, spend more, and the economy will grow. It has never worked anywhere. It is the same bullshit that The Obama touts on the federal level.

Krugman calls Republicans names in this very article, "radical right", yet you chastise us for calling him names.
 
Sad Rana... you just cant admit that Desh is on par with Bravo and Jarod in terms of stupidity. I know you like her as a person, but that doesn't change the fact that she is an idiot.
Now wait a second....Bravo may be dumber than a bag full of hammers and Jared may not spell so well and Desh is certainly a liberal partisan but neither Jarod or Desh is stupid.


Now if we want to talk about who's a major asshole........;)
 
Now wait a second....Bravo may be dumber than a bag full of hammers and Jared may not spell so well and Desh is certainly a liberal partisan but neither Jarod or Desh is stupid.

Now if we want to talk about who's a major asshole........;)

Both Desh and Jarod are idiots. Desh is a partisan idiot. Jarod... just your run of the mill dumbass.
 
I mean it's hilarious he even ran to groan me two seconds after I groaned him!

Sf are you still in a diaper? Tell the truth now.
Ya know what scares me is that the last time I new a man and a woman who argue like you and SF do......they got married! :)

(still are too.....and they still argue a lot).
 
Ya know what scares me is that the last time I new a man and a woman who argue like you and SF do......they got married! :)

(still are too.....and they still argue a lot).

Mott I should groan you for this one! Good thing you have built up a lot of goodwill with me, or I would take this outrage to Grind!
 
All those "facts" are really just shit Krugman has been spouting for years and that has never worked: tax more, spend more, and the economy will grow. It has never worked anywhere. It is the same bullshit that The Obama touts on the federal level.

Krugman calls Republicans names in this very article, "radical right", yet you chastise us for calling him names.

Still no contradictory "facts" to dispute what Krugman says; just the usual deflective dismissals from you.

Perhaps others can actually have a discussion about what he said re: the decline of the GOP in California.

BTW, I was not referring to anyone calling Krugman a name. My reference was to the name calling directed at other posters.
:cool:
 
Still no contradictory "facts" to dispute what Krugman says; just the usual deflective dismissals from you.

Perhaps others can actually have a discussion about what he said re: the decline of the GOP in California.

BTW, I was not referring to anyone calling Krugman a name. My reference was to the name calling directed at other posters.
:cool:


http://www.realclearmarkets.com/arti...ns_100236.html

I would suggest reading the above. It shows why a case can be made for both arguments...
 
Still no contradictory "facts" to dispute what Krugman says; just the usual deflective dismissals from you.

Perhaps others can actually have a discussion about what he said re: the decline of the GOP in California.

BTW, I was not referring to anyone calling Krugman a name. My reference was to the name calling directed at other posters.
:cool:
I cite the fact that Krugman's theory of tax and spend doesn't work, and never has. Krugman presents no facts that support his theory; we're left to assume that it works because he and other libs have stated so.
 
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/arti...ns_100236.html

I would suggest reading the above. It shows why a case can be made for both arguments...

Thank you. I read it and it was informative re: economic conditions altho not much new.

However, the focus of Krugman's article - as I mentioned - was the decline of the GOP based on, he says, the extreme positions that Republicans in the state have taken.

That has gone unremarked on by those, like yourself, who have dismissed with ad hom tactics the article.

Care to comment on Krugman's point?
:cool:
 
Back
Top