Have you seen the autopsy, forensics, or ballistics? The only thing we know for fact is the FBI lied about the 30-06. Did you see all the assistants standing behind Charlie? That's enough to at least question if the shot came from the front.This is one theory
![]()
New Slow Motion Video Shows Bullet Ricocheting Off Charlie Kirk’s Bulletproof Vest & Into His Neck At Utah University Event
Right-wing activist and US President Donald Trump's close ally, Charlie Kirk, was fatally shot in the neck on Wednesday, September 10, during an outdoor event at the Utah Valley University in Utah. In a viral video of the shooting, netizens claimed it appears that the single bullet that was...www.freepressjournal.in
Going for the head at Butler failed....going for the neck solves that problem.I believe the neck shot was intentional. A bullet to the head or torso would make it easier to tell which direction the shot came from.
I think the kid was aiming for the heart, as hunters do, not knowing Charlie had a vest on, but as you have stated, the autopsy and trial will give details.Have you seen the autopsy, forensics, or ballistics? The only thing we know for fact is the FBI lied about the 30-06. Did you see all the assistants standing behind Charlie? That's enough to at least question if the shot came from the front.
A 30-06 round has been ruled out.
Any high-velocity round is questionable.
Video evidence of the blood spritz out of Kirk's front-left neck appears to be an exit wound.
The 'kid' didn't have a gun. The entire roof is seen on a private security camera. Even Kash is feeling the pressure from YouTube investigators who have evidence of the shot coming from behind Charlie.I think the kid was aiming for the heart, as hunters do, not knowing Charlie had a vest on, but as you have stated, the autopsy and trial will give details.
He has confessed to the crime.The 'kid' didn't have a gun. The entire roof is seen on a private security camera. Even Kash is feeling the pressure from YouTube investigators who have evidence of the shot coming from behind Charlie.
The 'kid' didn't have a gun. The entire roof is seen on a private security camera. Even Kash is feeling the pressure from YouTube investigators who have evidence of the shot coming from behind Charlie.
Again, the entire roof is seen on a private security camera. Whoever was up there didn't have a rifle.He has confessed to the crime.
That's a bookbag with no evidence of it being carried by Tyler Robinson.
Yes, he did, watch the video in this article.
I guess you didn’t watch the video. It is clear he does.Again, the entire roof is seen on a private security camera. Whoever was up there didn't have a rifle.
I saw that video a half dozen times. There's no evidence of it being Tyler Robinson.I guess you didn’t watch the video. It is clear he does.
He confessed to his father, and his roommate.I saw that video a half dozen times. There's no evidence of it being Tyler Robinson.
That's how the feds avoid going to trial. Kash still has to deal with the evidence of the shot that killed Charlie came from behind him.He confessed to his father, and his roommate.
You will be proven wrong.That's how the feds avoid going to trial. Kash still has to deal with the evidence of the shot that killed Charlie came from behind him.
Let's wait and see how Kash deals with all the YouTubers calling him out on his lies.You will be proven wrong.
Well, Kash is a liar, but local authorities are handling the case. He faces state charges, not federal.Let's wait and see how Kash deals with all the YouTubers calling him out on his lies.
This case is perfect for understanding how government conspiracies work. Their big mistake was saying the shot came from a 30-06.Well, Kash is a liar, but local authorities are handling the case. He faces state charges, not federal.