Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
do you people really think the Anarcho syndicalists are "overthrowing all nations"?
clueless.
clueless.
clue me in.
whole parliament serves at the pleasure of the monarchy.Whilst theoretically possible, in practice it would never happen as it would likely destroy the monarchy. To dissolve Parliament needs the consent of the PM of the day.
Both Starmer and Macron of France want there to be a two-state solution in Palestine
Germany’s already is. I lived there in the 90’s and go back once or twice a year.If France, Germany, and the UK continue on the same path, all their culture will be in the past only.
you know Bibi funded Hamas right?Yes, and since there already is a 'two state solution', and it failed miserably, as Arabs are incapable of keeping their word on anything, creating a 'third state solution' is just buffoonery. Netanyahu has it right, move the vermin to a new shithole far away.
Not exactly......it was creating the conditions under which the Zionists can justify refusing peace......the colony was from the jump built upon war.you know Bibi funded Hamas right?
controlled opposition?
all this is a lie.
that what controlled opposition is used for.Not exactly......it was creating the conditions under which the Zionists can justify refusing peace......the colony was from the jump built upon war.
Israel colony.Not exactly......it was creating the conditions under which the Zionists can justify refusing peace......the colony was from the jump built upon war.
you know Bibi funded Hamas right?
controlled opposition?
all this is a lie.
yeah.So what? They got over 70% of the vote, with some 27% voting for even worse. Even the UN said it was a fair elections, dumbass. Your fake palis voted for a permanent war and genocide against Jews, like the ones you wank off over. Sucks to be such retarded losers, eh?
yeah.
so what.
the whole world is victim to cynical manipulations and lies.
cool.
Yes.Can King Charles dissolve Parliament?
Dictatorships sometimes do drastic things.It sounds a bit drastic.
What 'free speech'?Will that change anything...free speech and the Muslim invasion?
They might.I was asking if the new Parliament would want to change the immigration policy
What 'First Amendment policy'?and the First Amendment policy?
One way or the other, it will.Yes, I have seen the vast seas of people recently but does that translate into real change in UK's policies?
There is no constitution in the UK.AI Overview
In the United Kingdom, the King does have the legal power to dissolve Parliament, but by a constitutional convention, this power is only exercised at the request of the Prime Minister
. This was confirmed by the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022.
There are no 'rules'. The king can dissolve Parliament at any time on a whim.Recent legal changes
The rules regarding the dissolution of Parliament have recently changed:
- The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 removed the monarch's power to dissolve Parliament at will. Under this law, elections were to be held on a fixed schedule every five years, and an early election could only occur if a two-thirds majority in the House of Commons voted for it, or if the government lost a vote of no-confidence.
- The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 repealed the 2011 Act and restored the previous system based on royal prerogative. This means the power to trigger an early general election now rests with the Prime Minister, who advises the King to dissolve Parliament.
The monarch's role
While the King retains the legal authority, the modern role is formal and symbolic.
- On advice from the Prime Minister: The monarch dissolves Parliament by royal proclamation upon the Prime Minister's request. The dissolution that preceded the UK's July 2024 general election was the first to take place under this revived system, with King Charles III acting on the advice of then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
- In exceptional circumstances: Under constitutional convention, the King is generally expected to accept the Prime Minister's request. However, some constitutional experts argue that the monarch could, in theory, refuse a request for dissolution in certain extreme and undefined circumstances. This power has not been exercised since 1835 and would only happen during a major constitutional crisis.
Automatic dissolution
If the Prime Minister does not request an early election, Parliament is automatically dissolved five years after it first meets following a general election.
Nope. The king can dissolve Parliament on a whim and even get a new PM.Whilst theoretically possible, in practice it would never happen as it would likely destroy the monarchy. To dissolve Parliament needs the consent of the PM of the day.