Kerry Throws Doubt on Anonymous “Intelligence” Reports on Russian Hacks

Celticguy said:
This blur of accusations of Russian activities is remarkabke. I've been wondering why. Today it's clear.
The big money so famously cranky about their "investment" swirling down the toilet must be appeased.
And "whoops" won't do.
A sitting president is now concocting a fairy tale to save not just hrcs ass but his own. What manner of people are willing and able to put the fear of God into hrc and bo ?
We know Soros is a convicted criminal and no stranger to very dodgy elements. But the Arabs and chicoms are infamous for very heavy handed reactions to objects if their disaffection.
Oh what a tangled Web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
I love russias latest response 'if you have proof, show it otherwise shut up'. Media likely removed two words between shut and up.
FBI says there is no proof. BO burned all his leverage getting Comey to invent "intent" to keep hrc out of prison. No more get out if jail free cards left.
He may be thankful for jail if they decide to collect their pound of flesh.
Click to expand...

^ Not true.

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials. Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John O. Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.

“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI,” Brennan’s message read.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ection/ar-AAlEvfm?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout
 
christiefan915 said:
^ Not true.

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials. Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John O. Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.

“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI,” Brennan’s message read.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ection/ar-AAlEvfm?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout
Click to expand...

Why would the Russians want to help Trump?
 
Guille said:
Why would the Russians want to help Trump?
Click to expand...

Because he's a useful idiot who doesn't have the brains to understand how he's being played. And the rest follows from there.

bush 43 trusted him and how did that turn out? In 2001, President George Bush issued a truly astounding appraisal of Vladimir Putin, the former KGB agent who has run Russia since replacing Boris Yeltsin in 1999. "I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a very good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul; a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country."
 
Celticguy said:
This blur of accusations of Russian activities is remarkabke. I've been wondering why. Today it's clear.
The big money so famously cranky about their "investment" swirling down the toilet must be appeased.
And "whoops" won't do.
A sitting president is now concocting a fairy tale to save not just hrcs ass but his own. What manner of people are willing and able to put the fear of God into hrc and bo ?
We know Soros is a convicted criminal and no stranger to very dodgy elements. But the Arabs and chicoms are infamous for very heavy handed reactions to objects if their disaffection.
Oh what a tangled Web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
I love russias latest response 'if you have proof, show it otherwise shut up'. Media likely removed two words between shut and up.
FBI says there is no proof. BO burned all his leverage getting Comey to invent "intent" to keep hrc out of prison. No more get out if jail free cards left.
He may be thankful for jail if they decide to collect their pound of flesh.
Click to expand...

Hey dumb cunt; check the news.
The FBI verified thr CIA report.
How does Donalds little dick taste now?
 
point of order. Clinton's Emails were not published by WIKILEAKS...That was the damaging emails -the ones that got her investigated.
They were published because of FOIA requests. Nothing to do with Putin

So what was 'hacked?"

inboxPodesta ...= while entertaining they showed confusion in the campaign, but nothing really bad.
The exception might be Clinton's WallSt.speeches ( where she said wall st is beat able to regulate itself)

DNC -( where the FBI called them 10 times and they ignored it) which shows the "rigged game" for the Primaries
basically Sycophants for Hillary infestation..

AND THAT"S IT..... which in no way = "Putin hacked the election"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top