Keith Scott - Charlotte shooting victim exposed as career criminal and ex-con

Yank coppers are shit-scared out of their tiny minds, and can't tell one 'black' person from another, while racist posters believe all 'black' persons should be shot down like dogs anyway. Long live the NRA and race war. Death to democracy! Charming country!

You want to end the race war, get rid of affirmative action. That's the only racism in america.
 
avatar6170_1.gif

Has anyone noticed how much TDAK looks like a young Barack Obama?
The resemblance is uncanny.
 
Yes I did say that, and if I was a cop, I would not fire unless in immediate potentially lethal danger, regardless of the person's past.

So;
would you wait until they had the gun in there hand
or
would you wait until they pointed the gun at you
or
would you wait until they pulled the trigger

Please describe what "immediate potential lethal danger" would be and examples would be beneficial.
 
So;
would you wait until they had the gun in there hand
or
would you wait until they pointed the gun at you
or
would you wait until they pulled the trigger

Please describe what "immediate potential lethal danger" would be and examples would be beneficial.

To douchebag USFREEDUMB any black man poses an "immediate potential lethal danger". USFREEDUMB has never seen a cop murder that she could not justify. Especially if the victim was a black man.
Racism is an ugly thing.
 
So; would you wait until they had the gun in there hand

Did he say that? Every police agency has guidelines for use of lethal force. I'm not surprised that someone who doesn't know the difference between "their" and "there" is ignorant of that fact.

charlottenc.gov/CMPD/Documents/Resources/CMPDDirectives.pdf
 
Did he say that? Every police agency has guidelines for use of lethal force. I'm not surprised that someone who doesn't know the difference between "their" and "there" is ignorant of that fact.

HAHAHA. So all you have in way of "argument" is to attack other posters for typos? HAHAHA. No wonder you're the board laughingstock.
 
What he has done in the past should be irrelevant to whether or not his shooting was justifiable. The OP complains about the meeeedia, the same media that does THIS EXACT SAME THING for white people. All that matters is where you look. If your opinion is already going to be "this guy was a thug!" then of course you're going to be angry at news outlets that paint him as anything else. Now consider the Brock Turner case. Any news outlet that described him as anything other than a monster rapist got harsh criticism from the left, even though plenty of sites did just that. You can't have everything your way all the time, because some sites are left leaning, some right.

The past can indicate that the person his family is trying to portray as an angel isn't as squeaky clean as they make him out to be.


Since past actions can indicate the potential for current actions, what has happened in the past can be used to show that the current situation isn't what those defending him claim it to be.
 
Back
Top