Poor anchovies, take it up with him.
He’s your boy, one of the cult,
Poor anchovies, take it up with him.
When Trump makes calls for violence we will care.
Not the same thing. Context matters. Keith carefully puts his remark in the context of assassination, Trump clearly is speaking of economic and tells them that it would be an economic disaster and that nobody would be able to buy the Chinese cars...
Seriously. If you cannot see the difference here then you are deliberately misleading yourself.
I don't support Trump, but I can understand the difference between using a platform to wish for the actual murder of a specific person and someone talking about an economic disaster and terming it a bloodbath....
Though if crazies did actually start murdering folks if he loses I would definitely point back to "bloodbath" verbiage as something that unhinged idiots may have misconstrued.
Instead, Trump says "there will be a bloodbath" if he loses the election.
On Sunday, Trump wrote that Cheney should “go to jail along with the rest” of the select January 6 House committee, which he sought to insult in his post on Truth Social by calling it the “unselect committee”.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/18/trump-liz-cheney-prison-jan-6-investigation
I’m not going to support overman for president, or start watching his show.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/r...w-reports/trump-incited-january-6-defendants/
Two hundred ten defendants from 40 states and the District of Columbia who were charged for their participation in the January 6th insurrection have said they were answering Donald Trump’s calls when they traveled to Washington and joined the violent attack on the Capitol. CREW’s examination of court filings, transcripts, and news items regarding defendants in January 6th cases shows that defendants—ranging from convicted seditionists such as members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers to individual members of the public—considered Trump their leader and believed they were following his lead by joining the insurrection.
Trump is absolutely correct.
What defendant has told a court that he harmed someone because Olberman suggested it?
Trump has been named
Ah yes, Trump was born without sin.
Instead, Trump says "there will be a bloodbath" if he loses the election.
What?
I guess Jesus is guilty because some cleric in the middle ages claimed he told him to burn heretics
LOL, you are insane and literally the dumbest person on the interwebz...
It’s been testified to in court
Ah yes, you're a lying cocksucker who makes claims you can't back up.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/r...w-reports/trump-incited-january-6-defendants/
Two hundred ten defendants from 40 states and the District of Columbia who were charged for their participation in the January 6th insurrection have said they were answering Donald Trump’s calls when they traveled to Washington and joined the violent attack on the Capitol. CREW’s examination of court filings, transcripts, and news items regarding defendants in January 6th cases shows that defendants—ranging from convicted seditionists such as members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers to individual members of the public—considered Trump their leader and believed they were following his lead by joining the insurrection.
Aw, lying again Lurch?
How pathetic.
DERP
Let's see it, dumbfuck? Let's see TRUMP CALLING FOR VIOLENCE - his own words?
Come on Truthy - support your pathetic fucking lies..
Seriously, not taxing imports as promised is really going to result in an economic bloodbath?
For one who launched a violent attack on the Capitol with his comments even employing the word bloodbath in any context is poor judgement and understandably could lead others to warn about possible violence
“Bloodbath”