Kathleen Stupidelius gets rectally abused again

Damocles said:
If they gave me 634 Million I'm pretty sure I could build one that worked.
Click to expand...

It wasn't even close to $634 million.

Rumor Check: Obamacare Website Might Be Glitchy, But It Didn’t Cost $634 Million

While the federal website to signup for Obamacare was riddled with errors and had a rocky rollout, it didn’t cost $634 million to build. The eye-popping supposed pricetag gained traction Thursday after technology website Digital Trends compared it to the estimate released by the government contractor, which was $541 million less.

CGI Federal announced in 2011 that it had been awarded a $93.7 million contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to build the federal health insurance exchange, healthcare.gov, which formally launched on Oct. 1, 2013.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ght-be-glitchy-but-it-didnt-cost-634-million/
 
Big money said:
How so? Didn't you claim the Obamacare website was "impressive"?

Why, yes, you did:

ZappasGuitar said:
Only a total partisan hack like you would try and pretend that a website getting nearly TWO THIRDS OF A MILLION HITS in one day isn't impressive.
Click to expand...

Or are you admitting that "hits" without results aren't really impressive?
Click to expand...


No, I didn't.

I stated quite clearly that a website that gets nearly two thirds of a million hits in one day is impressive.

How typical for a troll.

Just can't bring your petty troll ass to discuss the issue with any honesty, can you?
 
christiefan915 said:
It wasn't even close to $634 million.

Rumor Check: Obamacare Website Might Be Glitchy, But It Didn’t Cost $634 Million

While the federal website to signup for Obamacare was riddled with errors and had a rocky rollout, it didn’t cost $634 million to build. The eye-popping supposed pricetag gained traction Thursday after technology website Digital Trends compared it to the estimate released by the government contractor, which was $541 million less.

CGI Federal announced in 2011 that it had been awarded a $93.7 million contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to build the federal health insurance exchange, healthcare.gov, which formally launched on Oct. 1, 2013.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ght-be-glitchy-but-it-didnt-cost-634-million/
Click to expand...


What's that you're saying?

More total nonsense from a petty troll and some other partisan Righties?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I stated quite clearly that a website that gets nearly two thirds of a million hits in one day is impressive.
Click to expand...

That's what I said you said.

Since the Obamacare website is so "impressive" and you're so proud of that stat (got a link for that, BTW?), can you explain why the site isn't able to process many applications?
 
The government made an attempt to turn the online issues into positive coverage, blaming the glitches on high demands.


'Americans are excited to look at their options for health coverage, with record demand in the first days of the marketplaces,' said the release announcing the planned fixes.


The statement was headlined: 'Health Insurance Marketplace Open for Business - Week One Success.'




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2451728/Wolf-Blitzer-says-Obamacare-delayed-website-glitches-fixed.html#ixzz2hS2pvIWK
 
Big money said:
That's what I said you said.

Since the Obamacare website is so "impressive" and you're so proud of that stat (got a link for that, BTW?), can you explain why the site isn't able to process many applications?
Click to expand...


Except I never said the Obama Care website is impressive.

Why can't you get that through your troll skull?
 
christiefan915 said:
Nobody pumps money into an effort they're counting on to fail.
Click to expand...

Are you saying Obama was counting on the effort to fail?



Digital Trends called the $93.7 million estimate a “chunk of change, but nothing near where it apparently ended up.”

Even though the site didn’t cost upwards of $600 million to build, many are still questioning why — with the $93.7 million tag — it still wasn’t up to snuff.




http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/10/rumor-check-obamacare-website-might-be-glitchy-but-it-didnt-cost-634-million/
 
Big money said:
Are you saying Obama was counting on the effort to fail?



Digital Trends called the $93.7 million estimate a “chunk of change, but nothing near where it apparently ended up.”

Even though the site didn’t cost upwards of $600 million to build, many are still questioning why — with the $93.7 million tag — it still wasn’t up to snuff.




http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/10/rumor-check-obamacare-website-might-be-glitchy-but-it-didnt-cost-634-million/
Click to expand...


You are doing one amazing job of dodging the question put to you.
 
Big money said:
Thanks.

Since I don't intend to answer it, it really isn't hard.

Maybe you can explain why a website that cost $93.7 million and has been in the works for years doesn't work properly.
Click to expand...


Thanks for confirming what everyone already suspected.

You're just another coward scared shitless of honest discussion.

Why don't you take your shitty little troll identity and go somewhere else?
 
Big money said:
Are you saying Obama was counting on the effort to fail?

Digital Trends called the $93.7 million estimate a “chunk of change, but nothing near where it apparently ended up.”

Even though the site didn’t cost upwards of $600 million to build, many are still questioning why — with the $93.7 million tag — it still wasn’t up to snuff.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/10/rumor-check-obamacare-website-might-be-glitchy-but-it-didnt-cost-634-million/
Click to expand...

That's just silly, he has everything to lose if it fails. All I want to know is how much money a project like this should cost. Apparently the govt. thought less than $100 million. This news came out in 2011. Guess that's long enough for the RW spin machine to hope it got lost in cyberspace so they could launch the phony claim of $643 million.

"CGI Federal has won a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services contract worth up to $93.7 million to build a health insurance exchange that is federally-facilitated, the company announced today. The contract to build Federal Exchange was awarded by CMS’ Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight. It has a two-year base value of $55.7 million with three one-year options.

CGI said the exchange is required underneath a provision in the Affordable Care Act which mandates a new competitive health insurance marketplace for states and territories."

- See more at: http://blog.executivebiz.com/2011/1...der-affordable-care-act/#sthash.EILJbaCL.dpuf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top