Kasich trounced everyone in that debate

Thing1 said:
Every time he spoke, my immediate reaction was along the lines of "finally, an adult is talking."

I don't get it, for a second. Why isn't this guy way ahead in the polls? He'd be a shoe-in to win this election in November. I know that GOPers hate the fact that he is every Democrat's favorite Republican, but his conservative credentials are pretty impeccable. His track record as governor & in congress speaks for itself - no one else on that stage comes close.

What a waste of an outstanding candidate. I guess primary voters would rather "stick it" to the establishment, or whatever their reasoning is. Because it's not finding a good President.
Click to expand...

The fact that YOU like him and that he is appealing to lefties is all you need to know.

McCain was "the adult in the room" and appealing to lefties

So was Romney

So was Dole

Republican voters are tired of their candidates being Charlie Brown to the democrat party's Lucy.

Or

If you don't like that analogy they are tired of being the Washington Generals to the Harlem Globetrotters

This isn't complicated
 
I Love America said:
The fact that YOU like him and that he is appealing to lefties is all you need to know.

McCain was "the adult in the room" and appealing to lefties

So was Romney

So was Dole

Republican voters are tired of their candidates being Charlie Brown to the democrat party's Lucy.

Or

If you don't like that analogy they are tired of being the Washington Generals to the Harlem Globetrotters

This isn't complicated
Click to expand...

Dole, McCain, and Romney didn't get us stuck in Iraq, either.
 
I Love America said:
Seriously? McCain?

If you want to keep supporting losers, go ahead
Click to expand...

McCain ran in 2008. He's hardly a peer of Dole or Romney when it comes to losing. And, to the point that you completely ignored, had McCain been nominated in 2000, he would have carried the popular vote with no controversy, and no minor lapses in decision-making regarding Iraq.

All populists are losers.
 
Eno L. Camino said:
McCain ran in 2008. He's hardly a peer of Dole or Romney when it comes to losing. And, to the point that you completely ignored, had McCain been nominated in 2000, he would have carried the popular vote with no controversy, and no minor lapses in decision-making regarding Iraq.

All populists are losers.
Click to expand...

You actually think McCain is a conservative don't you?
 
freedom?


you fucks hate black people


gays


trans


atheists


or anyone who doesn't masterbate with a gun
 
cawacko said:
Last night was by far his best debate. So he didn't perform his best early on when trying to differentiate yourself from a group of 15 candidates can be difficult and many voters make up their mind. There were also other candidates with a similar story "I took over a state that was X number of dollars in debt and now we have a surplus and Y number of new jobs". And in a time with so many calling for "outsiders" his 'I was in Congress for 20 years' story doesn't sell the best.

He has made it to the remaining four candidates which is impressive. The numbers to watch in the Michigan primary will be what percentage of those voters who decided last minute voted for Kasich. That will tell you how "well" his debate performance was perceived.
Click to expand...

his best debate doesn't mean much given how poorly he's been doing.

these debates aren't about making points or sounding smart... it's about converting votes. did he do that? If he didn't, the debate is worthless
 
I Love America said:
The fact that YOU like him and that he is appealing to lefties is all you need to know.

McCain was "the adult in the room" and appealing to lefties
Click to expand...

yeah and what's more ironic is the lefties looooved mccain and would say they wouldn't mind him running but as soon as he was in the race all bets were off and he suddenly became the super white old racist idiot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top