Kamala's hypocrisy

NiftyNiblick said:
After that ludicrous analysis, no questions are appropriate.

I do like your new "Golden Shower" nickname, however. Well done, Owl.
Click to expand...
As if your "analysis" was based on anything but partisan hate? "Kavanaugh is a dangerous mutant".

The actual truth hurts, doesn't it? Pelosi IS a drunkard.

Call me 'poopie pants' or any other name you like. Doesn't bother me. Nor does it make your words any more valid.

Good day. :smile:
 
Life is Golden said:
VP demands that politicians 'speak out against hate' after Paul Pelosi attack – but neither she nor Biden has yet condemned man arrested with gun outside Brett Kavanaugh's home

  • Paul Pelosi, 82, underwent surgery on Friday for a fractured skull after he was attacked in the early hours of the morning at their San Francisco home
  • A hammer-wielding assailant, David DePape, 42, shouted: 'Where is Nancy?': he has been arrested and will be charged with attempted homicide
  • Kamala Harris on Friday condemned the attack in her hometown, and urged people to 'speak out against hate'
  • Critics pointed out the vice president failed to speak out when a plot to kill Brett Kavanaugh was foiled: his attacker too faces attempted murder charges
  • Joe Biden on Friday also condemned the attack on Paul Pelosi: he, too, walked away when reporters asked him to condemn the attack on Kavanaugh
  • A California man, Nicholas John Roske, was arrested on June 8 outside the Supreme Court justice's home with a gun and knife, hoping to kill him
Critics pointed out that Harris and President Biden failed to speak out against hate when Kavanaugh's life was threatened in June by a 26-year-old Californian, who travelled across the country intent on killing him. Kavanaugh was targeted for his support for the repeal of Roe v. Wade.

On Friday, however, Harris took the moral high ground.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-Pelosi-attack-despite-Kavanaugh-silence.html
Click to expand...

WHY YOU LYING FUCK!

WASHINGTON, June 8 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden condemns the actions of the man who said he planned to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the White House said Wednesday.

Biden “condemns the actions if this individual in the strongest terms,” Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said. “Any threats of violence or attempts to intimidate justices have no place in our society.”

https://www.reuters.com/legal/gover...-who-threatened-justice-kavanaugh-2022-06-08/
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The situations are not the same, therefore there's nothing to be consistent.

Please enlighten me about "where the real violence and danger lies."
Click to expand...
Sure they are. A crazy person harming or threatening to do harm to a politician or SCJ.

Kamala demands other politicians "speak out against hate" but she does not, has not and will not when the perps are left wing lunatics.

Historically, which groups are responsible for mass, perpetual riots, destruction of businesses, burning of cars, rioting after elections because they don't like the result, have been a continual cause for SWAT teams to be dispersed at inaugurations?

We both know the answer. If you want to be honest and engage, I may choose to respond. If you're just trolling again, then it will back to no response. You set the tempo.
 
Life is Golden said:
Sure they are. A crazy person harming or threatening to do harm to a politician or SCJ.

Kamala demands other politicians "speak out against hate" but she does not, has not and will not when the perps are left wing lunatics.

Historically, which groups are responsible for mass, perpetual riots, destruction of businesses, burning of cars, rioting after elections because they don't like the result, have been a continual cause for SWAT teams to be dispersed at inaugurations?

We both know the answer. If you want to be honest and engage, I may choose to respond. If you're just trolling again, then it will back to no response. You set the tempo.
Click to expand...

Yes, stupid and/or crazy people are a problem.

Agreed on Harris's hypocrisy.

Trumpers? 1/6 was pretty violent. I'd be happy to read any data you have. Regardless, all violent people should be arrested and charged.

Your choice to answer or not. I believe in choices and respect people who make honest choices.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The situations are not the same, therefore there's nothing to be consistent.

Please enlighten me about "where the real violence and danger lies."
Click to expand...

It isn't so much where it lies as much as there is a distinct difference between how the radical Right and radical Left carry violence out. I've said this many times before, and we've seen it again in this attack by some radical Right nutter, versus the actions of radical Leftist environmentalists of recent.

The Pelosi attack is characteristic of the radical Right. A lone nutjob with an axe to grind comes completely unhinged and goes on a violent rampage. The Kavanaugh attempted assassination by a radical Leftist was a glaring exception, but of course he also was unable to carry it through. A radical Right nutter would have gone through with it.
Characteristic of the radical Left are the environmental protesters tossing soup on pictures and gluing themselves to walls and floors. These violent (and they are violent just not as violent) low-grade attacks on society aren't one-off acts but generally are carried out by the mob, if you will. That is dozens of radical Leftists carry out such attacks day after day hitting various targets and causing serious property damage. Personal injury is usually limited to minor assaults, resisting arrest, etc.

The lone actor on the radical Right can be incredibly violent and will often run up a body count. The mob on the radical Left will cause millions, tens of millions, in property damage, injure dozens, and whole city centers for days causing the loss of millions more in business and other disruptions of society. At the extreme, they get control of some area of a city like the CHAZ / CHOP. Then society crumbles, there are murders, wholesale looting, and society degrades into anarchy. An historical example is the Terror of Paris 1793 during the French Revolution. Same thing, same result.

Both are violent, and both are dangerous. You have to decide which is potentially worse: The loss of a few lives or the breakdown of society as a whole on a local scale. I see them as equally vile and to be condemned.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
...Both are violent, and both are dangerous. You have to decide which is potentially worse: The loss of a few lives or the breakdown of society as a whole on a local scale. I see them as equally vile and to be condemned.
Click to expand...

It's the function of the courts to decide which is worse. Why are you suggesting that courts become Kangaroo Courts subject to Popular Opinion?

IMO, all violent people should be arrested and charged.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's the function of the courts to decide which is worse. Why are you suggesting that courts become Kangaroo Courts subject to Popular Opinion?

IMO, all violent people should be arrested and charged.
Click to expand...

Wrong! The courts can only decide innocence or quilt according to the law. It isn't the courts that decide politics, policy, or legislative bills. That's for the people and legislatures / elected politicians to decide.

I agree that all violent people should be arrested and charged. Maybe we could start with doing that to the thousands of violent Leftist protesters that rioted all summer of 2020...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It isn't so much where it lies as much as there is a distinct difference between how the radical Right and radical Left carry violence out. I've said this many times before, and we've seen it again in this attack by some radical Right nutter, versus the actions of radical Leftist environmentalists of recent.

The Pelosi attack is characteristic of the radical Right. A lone nutjob with an axe to grind comes completely unhinged and goes on a violent rampage. The Kavanaugh attempted assassination by a radical Leftist was a glaring exception, but of course he also was unable to carry it through. A radical Right nutter would have gone through with it.
Characteristic of the radical Left are the environmental protesters tossing soup on pictures and gluing themselves to walls and floors. These violent (and they are violent just not as violent) low-grade attacks on society aren't one-off acts but generally are carried out by the mob, if you will. That is dozens of radical Leftists carry out such attacks day after day hitting various targets and causing serious property damage. Personal injury is usually limited to minor assaults, resisting arrest, etc.

The lone actor on the radical Right can be incredibly violent and will often run up a body count. The mob on the radical Left will cause millions, tens of millions, in property damage, injure dozens, and whole city centers for days causing the loss of millions more in business and other disruptions of society. At the extreme, they get control of some area of a city like the CHAZ / CHOP. Then society crumbles, there are murders, wholesale looting, and society degrades into anarchy. An historical example is the Terror of Paris 1793 during the French Revolution. Same thing, same result.

Both are violent, and both are dangerous. You have to decide which is potentially worse: The loss of a few lives or the breakdown of society as a whole on a local scale. I see them as equally vile and to be condemned.
Click to expand...

So Jan 6th was just a couple of thousand loan nut jobs that got together to attack the Capitol? Personally I think the bigger danger is people attacking our Capitol compared to a couple of nutjobs throwing soup at a painting. It's interesting that you would bring up the French revolution and then discount the Jan 6th insurrection.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Yes, stupid and/or crazy people are a problem.

Agreed on Harris's hypocrisy.

Trumpers? 1/6 was pretty violent. I'd be happy to read any data you have. Regardless, all violent people should be arrested and charged.

Your choice to answer or not. I believe in choices and respect people who make honest choices.
Click to expand...
I assume you have paid attention to current events over the past 20 years.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Wrong! The courts can only decide innocence or quilt according to the law. It isn't the courts that decide politics, policy, or legislative bills. That's for the people and legislatures / elected politicians to decide.

I agree that all violent people should be arrested and charged. Maybe we could start with doing that to the thousands of violent Leftist protesters that rioted all summer of 2020...
Click to expand...
Bears repeating.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Wrong! The courts can only decide innocence or quilt according to the law. It isn't the courts that decide politics, policy, or legislative bills. That's for the people and legislatures / elected politicians to decide.

I agree that all violent people should be arrested and charged. Maybe we could start with doing that to the thousands of violent Leftist protesters that rioted all summer of 2020...
Click to expand...

This is the kind of nonsense you believe and regurgitate.
Hundreds were arrested in connection with the riots in 2020. A rather large number were convicted. The problem is because the arrests and convictions were local you pretend they didn't happen.
Thousands protested peacefully in 2020. Some of them were arrested. Some of them were injured by the police. In the case of leftist riots you seem to want to blame everyone, even those that committed no violent crimes. Then when it comes to Jan 6th you want to absolve everyone that urged the action that resulted in an attack on our government.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Wrong! The courts can only decide innocence or quilt according to the law. It isn't the courts that decide politics, policy, or legislative bills. That's for the people and legislatures / elected politicians to decide.

I agree that all violent people should be arrested and charged. Maybe we could start with doing that to the thousands of violent Leftist protesters that rioted all summer of 2020...
Click to expand...
No shit. Why are you flip-flopping on locking up violent people?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So Jan 6th was just a couple of thousand loan nut jobs that got together to attack the Capitol? Personally I think the bigger danger is people attacking our Capitol compared to a couple of nutjobs throwing soup at a painting. It's interesting that you would bring up the French revolution and then discount the Jan 6th insurrection.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. Jan 6 was a 3-ish hour riot. It accomplished NOTHING. The French revolution saw the violent overthrow of the government with the leadership murdered, armed mobs in the streets attacking anyone they thought was against them. That was followed by wholesale executions of people said to be against the revolution. Wholly and totally different thing.


As for my comparison, it was one using current events. I can give plenty of other examples. The 2020 riot outside the White House where the rioters burned a church down, among other violence. Or, the weeks of attacks on the Portland federal courthouse and general destruction of downtown Portland by a huge mob of riotous radical Leftists. I tossed in CHAZ / CHOP where the protesters (in violation of federal law) declared themselves a separate nation.

So, your selective memory needs some updating.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
This is the kind of nonsense you believe and regurgitate.
Hundreds were arrested in connection with the riots in 2020. A rather large number were convicted. The problem is because the arrests and convictions were local you pretend they didn't happen.
Thousands protested peacefully in 2020. Some of them were arrested. Some of them were injured by the police. In the case of leftist riots you seem to want to blame everyone, even those that committed no violent crimes. Then when it comes to Jan 6th you want to absolve everyone that urged the action that resulted in an attack on our government.
Click to expand...

Well said and agreed. Notice that all of those defending 1/6 are White Nationalists who consistently attack women, Americans of color and scream "MAGA" AKA Make America White Again.

6ob958.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top