KAMALA HARRIS SCREWED HER WAY INTO POLITICS

Get over it.
She usurped the rightful roll of the wife in his life!
Grow up. get used to people dishing back to YOU what you've dished out to opposing pols.

Again, Willie Brown amicably separated from his wife in 1981.

Kamala Harris went on some dates with him in 1995, 14 years after he separated from his wife.

You seem to be swift to judge people you know nothing about.

I do not know if you have experience with relationships, but there could be many reasons couples separate but stay married. Maybe Willie Brown wanted her to keep the rights to his pension, insurance, and health care benefits. Maybe he was just too lazy or cheap to hire a divorce attorney. Who knows?

But after 14 years of separation from his wife, I think he can be expected to go on dates, and Senator Harris was not committing the egregious sin against God that you would like to portray it as
 
Again, Willie Brown amicably separated from his wife in 1981.

Kamala Harris went on some dates with him in 1995, 14 years after he separated from his wife.

You seem to be swift to judge people you know nothing about.

I do not know if you have experience with relationships, but there could be many reasons couples separate but stay married. Maybe Willie Brown wanted her to keep the rights to his pension, insurance, and health care benefits. Maybe he was just too lazy or cheap to hire a divorce attorney. Who knows?

But after 14 years of separation from his wife, I think he can be expected to go on dates, and Senator Harris was not committing the egregious sin against God that you would like to portray it as

The Clinton fans did exactly the same thing to tube the career of General Joseph Ralston when the Clinton's adulterous affairs and sexual harassment accusations were in the news. Ralston was legally separated from his wife and his relation with another woman was completely consensual, but the Democrats fucked him over for as revenge for the accusations against Clinton.
 
The Clinton fans did exactly the same thing to tube the career of General Joseph Ralston when the Clinton's adulterous affairs and sexual harassment accusations were in the news. Ralston was legally separated from his wife and his relation with another woman was completely consensual, but the Democrats fucked him over for as revenge for the accusations against Clinton.

I have never heard of John Ralston, and I think I can guarantee you that no established liberal on this board has complained about John Ralston. Certainly not me.

We are all accountable for the words that come out of our own mouths and keyboards. On this thread, Deplorables have elected to mount their moral high horse and claim Senator Harris is violating sacred biblical law for going on some dates with a man who had been separated from his wife for 14 years.
 
The Clinton fans did exactly the same thing to tube the career of General Joseph Ralston when the Clinton's adulterous affairs and sexual harassment accusations were in the news. Ralston was legally separated from his wife and his relation with another woman was completely consensual, but the Democrats fucked him over for as revenge for the accusations against Clinton.

First time I've heard of that.
 
I was raised Catholic and learned the Catechism from age five, yet was in college taking a Classics course before I realized there were two creation stories in Genesis. :whoa:
I was in my 40’s as you might recall, read Joseph Campbell, what an eye opener for me.
 
Willie Brown was separated from his wife in the early 1980s, more than a decade before he went on some dates with Kamala Harris.

Your Orange God was banging porn actresses without a condom when his current wife was in her 9th month of pregnancy.
The continue to miss the point, Democrats didn’t care what people did in their sexual, private, adult lives as long as it didn’t affect their jobs. The Republicans and the Moral Majority were the ones who first started to make an issues of morality. Now, suddenly with Trump they state it doesn’t matter. We still don’t care who Trump is bonking, it’s the hypocrisy we are highlighting and the fact he is a serial sexual assaulter.
 
The Clinton fans did exactly the same thing to tube the career of General Joseph Ralston when the Clinton's adulterous affairs and sexual harassment accusations were in the news. Ralston was legally separated from his wife and his relation with another woman was completely consensual, but the Democrats fucked him over for as revenge for the accusations against Clinton.
I never heard anything about it, and can only state my opinion. Private and consensual sexual affairs should not considered for any qualified job applicant.

In the cold war I know there were national security concerns about miltary or government employees with top secret security clearance engaging in sexual picadillos because that was one of KGB's favorite ways to entrap and compromise western military and government officials. But I leave that to lawyers and JAG attorneys to sort out.
 
The continue to miss the point, Democrats didn’t care what people did in their sexual, private, adult lives as long as it didn’t affect their jobs. The Republicans and the Moral Majority were the ones who first started to make an issues of morality. Now, suddenly with Trump they state it doesn’t matter. We still don’t care who Trump is bonking, it’s the hypocrisy we are highlighting and the fact he is a serial sexual assaulter.

Yes indeed.

Trump is not the first fat, old man to have to pay for sex, and he will not be the last.
 
I have never heard of John Ralston, and I think I can guarantee you that no established liberal on this board has complained about John Ralston. Certainly not me.

We are all accountable for the words that come out of our own mouths and keyboards. On this thread, Deplorables have elected to mount their moral high horse and claim Senator Harris is violating sacred biblical law for going on some dates with a man who had been separated from his wife for 14 years.

Do you remember Bill Clinton as President, his draft-dodging and adultery? How about his impeachment and adjudication of perjury?
 
First time I've heard of that.

When someone does something grievously wrong, be it doxxing or seeking to ruin a good General's military career, it can be memorable to some people who recognize that in injustice was done.

Bob Dylan wrote a great song about a similar but worse injustice titled "Hurricane".

 
' Hurricane ' is about boxing corruption, you numb-skull nuke-head.

ROFLMAO! What fucking Third World Shithole do you live, moon? Rubin "Hurricane" Carter was boxer unjustly convicted and imprisoned for a triple murder he never committed. His only guilt was DWB. Nothing about "boxing corruption", you foreign shitheel.
 
Consenting adults having sex is none of the business of rightys. Making the claim that she screwed her way up the ladder is totally unsubstantiated. She had been doing a good job at every station she got. She has the education and the experience. The claim of screwing her way up is just nasty right wing made up crap that should be ignored.
 
I never heard anything about it, and can only state my opinion. Private and consensual sexual affairs should not considered for any qualified job applicant.

In the cold war I know there were national security concerns about miltary or government employees with top secret security clearance engaging in sexual picadillos because that was one of KGB's favorite ways to entrap and compromise western military and government officials. But I leave that to lawyers and JAG attorneys to sort out.
You mean like Gen. Paetraus?
 
Consenting adults having sex is none of the business of rightys. Making the claim that she screwed her way up the ladder is totally unsubstantiated. She had been doing a good job at every station she got. She has the education and the experience. The claim of screwing her way up is just nasty right wing made up crap that should be ignored.

It's only the business of the Leftys when it's a Righty. :D

Agreed about Harris. FWIW, Trump's Chief of Staff Mark Meadows confirmed that Harris is a US citizen and it's a baseless conspiracy theory to say she isn't.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...y-theory-not-something-that-were-gonna-pursue
White House chief of staff Mark Meadows says the White House is not going to "pursue" the conspiracy theory that California Sen. Kamala Harris is ineligible to be vice president.

In a Sunday interview for CNN's State of the Union, host Jake Tapper asked Meadows if he believed Harris to be eligible for the position after the Trump campaign floated the theory without directly endorsing it.

"Sure," he said, adding, "And I think the president spoke to this yesterday. This is not something that we're gonna pursue."

Meadows asserted that the press was blowing the issue out of proportion.
 
Back
Top