Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails

anatta

100% recycled karma
WASHINGTON — A computer specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails despite orders from Congress to preserve them was given immunity by the Justice Department during its investigation into her personal email account, according to a law enforcement official and others briefed on the investigation.

Republicans have called for the department to investigate the deletions, but the immunity deal with the specialist, Paul Combetta, makes it unlikely that the request will go far. Representative Jason Chaffetz of Utah, the top Republican on the House oversight committee, asked the Justice Department on Tuesday to investigate whether Mrs. Clinton, her lawyers or the specialist obstructed justice when the emails were deleted in March 2015.

Mr. Combetta is one of at least two people who were given immunity by the Justice Department as part of the investigation. The other was Bryan Pagliano, a former campaign staff member for Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, who was granted immunity in exchange for answering questions about how he set up a server in Mrs. Clinton’s home in Chappaqua, N.Y., around the time she became secretary of state in 2009.

The F.B.I. described the deletions by Mr. Combetta in a summary of its investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s account that was released last Friday. The documents blacked out the specialist’s name, but the law enforcement official and others familiar with the case identified the employee as Mr. Combetta. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing matters that were supposed to remain confidential.

Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said that the deletions by the specialist, who worked for a Colorado company called Platte River Networks, had already been “thoroughly examined by the F.B.I. prior to its decision to close out this case.”

As the F.B.I.’s report notes,” Mr. Fallon said, “neither Hillary Clinton nor her attorneys had knowledge of the Platte River Network employee’s actions. It appears he acted on his own and against guidance given by both Clinton’s and Platte River’s attorneys to retain all data in compliance with a congressional preservation request.”

A lawyer for Mr. Combetta and a spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment.

In July, the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, announced that the bureau would not recommend that Mrs. Clinton and her aides be charged with a crime for their handling of classified information on the account.



Five days later, Mr. Chaffetz — who has led the charge in raising questions about the F.B.I.’s decision — asked prosecutors to investigate whether Mrs. Clinton had lied to Congress about her email account in testimony in October before the special committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. That request has been met with silence from the Justice Department.

The House oversight committee has asked officials from Platte River Networks, Mr. Combetta and others to appear at a hearing before his committee on Tuesday about how the email account was set up and how the messages were deleted.

According to the F.B.I. documents, Mr. Combetta told the bureau in February that he did not recall deleting the emails. But in May, he told a different story.


In the days after Mrs. Clinton’s staffers called Platte River Networks in March 2015, Mr. Combetta said realized that he had not followed a December 2014 order from Mrs. Clinton’s lawyers to have the emails deleted. Mr. Combetta then used a program called BleachBit to delete the messages, the bureau said.

In Mr. Combetta’s first interview with the F.B.I. in February, he said he did not recall seeing the preservation order from the Benghazi committee, which Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer, Cheryl D. Mills, had sent to Platte River. But in his May interview, he said that at the time he made the deletions “he was aware of the existence of the preservation request and the fact that it meant he should not disturb Clinton’s email data” on the Platte River server.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-investigation.html?_r=1
 
OK...
so this dude suddenly realizes he didn't delete the Platte River server days after the preservation order to protect the server was issued.

Mr. Combetta’s first interview with the F.B.I. in February, he said he did not recall seeing the preservation order from the Benghazi committee, which Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer, Cheryl D. Mills, had sent to Platte River.
But in his May interview, he said that at the time he made the deletions “he was aware of the existence of the preservation request and the fact that it meant he should not disturb Clinton’s email data” on the Platte River server.

++

which led to his "oh shit" moment. Somewhere in there DOJ grants immunity.

Uh huh.*the dog ate my homework* excuse -but you're immune from teachers' wrath
 
Clinton email had 'multiple' classified markings

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ed-markings-challenging-her-claim-to-fbi.html

New details about the emails on Hillary Clinton's personal server that contained classified markings call into question her claim to the FBI that she didn't know what the markings meant -- and even believed they represented an alphabetical listing of paragraphs.

A government source told Fox News that virtually every paragraph in one mail contained so-called portion markings used exclusively for classification purposes. These classified codes are found on the left-hand side and reflect the classification of the intelligence contained in each paragraph.

The Clinton email has one paragraph marked "C" for "confidential," which is the lowest level of classification. And the source said "multiple paragraphs (on the same email) are marked, SBU," which means "sensitive but unclassified."

Both codes are there so the reader knows what is classified intelligence.

"It's not possible, not even plausible, it's an alphabetical listing. The explanation makes no sense," the government source said, referring to Clinton's statement to the FBI in her July 2 interview.

In FBI investigation notes released Friday, agents wrote that Clinton, when asked what the “C” marking meant, “stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order."

But the source said the appearance of other classified codes on the email further undercut that claim.

A second government source who has also reviewed the FBI file said none of the handful of emails with classified markings contain "A, B or other letters" to support Clinton’s “alphabetical” answer, adding the "A, B, C..SBU does not fly."

Fox News first reported in June that at least one of the Clinton emails was marked classified, conflicting with her public statements.

In an interview with Fox's Sean Hannity, the head of Wikileaks Julian Assange also challenged Clinton's statement to the FBI.

"Hillary Clinton says she can't remember what a ‘C’ in brackets stands for. Everyone in positions of government and in Wikileaks knows it stands for classified, ‘confidential,’” Assange said. He said Wikileaks has already released thousands of cables showing Clinton’s signature with (C) next to it.

Clinton has said in the past that many of the cables carry an electronic signature and that she did not personally write or review all of them.

The FBI file also reveals that from the beginning of Hillary Clinton's term in 2009 as secretary of state, the department installed secure rooms, known as "SCIFs" for her official use at both of her residences in Washington, D.C., and in Chappaqua, N.Y.

These Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities contain secure communications equipment authorized to be used to conduct official government business including the reading of sensitive and classified materials.

Instead, Clinton chose to use a variety of 13 mobile devices like Blackberrys as well as iPads for checking emails sent to her clintonemail.com address. The FBI said none of the mobile devices could be accounted for by Clinton's attorneys.

According to the highly redacted FBI documents released Friday, Clinton told the agents "that she did not have a computer of any kind in the SCIFs in her residences." However, Clinton's statement conflicts directly with accounts from three close aides, including Huma Abedin and Justin Cooper, who told the FBI there were "personally owned desktop computers in the SCIFs in Whitehaven and Chappaqua." The third name in the released documents is redacted

Howard Krongard, former State Department inspector general, told Fox News in email that, "If Abedin, Cooper and (Redacted) are correct, I do not know how you can have personally-owned non-approved desktop computers in a SCIF. That would be like inviting the outside world into your SCIF."

In addition, Abedin told the bureau "the SCIF door at the Whiteaven residence (DC) was not always locked." nor the SCIF in Chappaqa always "secured."

Cooper, who was in charge of the upgraded server installation in Chappaqua and Whitehaven, was identified as the staffer tasked to destroy Clinton's Blackberrys with a hammer.
 
Back
Top