Justice Department NOW Targeting 3 Fox Reporters

[DamnYankee]

just my opinion having watched both of them... Faux news is negative Obama even on their straight news shows... Whereas MSNBC seems not to be so partisan in their delivery of news....again... just my opinion.

You backed off that pretty quick. How disappointing.

 

[DamnYankee]

Ironic post is so very ironic.

People have been trying to get you to add something of substance for MONTHS.

Funny, I gave up you years ago.

 

[zappasguitar]

I gave you three cites... would you like them again?

Generally its the outrage Republicans seem to be showing over the Justice Department for investigating a Fox News "reporter" for what appears to be a crime.

This thread is a great example of that outrage, so I would point to that first.

Post number 1 on this thread... written by SJJRSJJS has led me to believe that he believes Fox News Reporters must be above the law.

Of course, to find an example of what SF asked, one need go no farther than the OP of this thread and read SJ's petulant anger over Righties being investigated for breaking the law.

Of course, since it is crystal clear proof provided by another hate-filled Rightie, SF will deny it until doomsday before admitting he was wrong yet again.

That way he can continue to spew the epithets and derision while ignoring the proof you already provided.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

typical partisan Rightie hack.

Demands Jarod respond with corroboration and even tosses in another petty ad hom for the hell of it, but doesn't demand any corroboration from fellow partisan Rightie NOVA...oh the HYPOCRISY!

Let's all sit back and watch while he finds a way to spin this so it's not his problem...

LOL... um... did you demand Garud respond with evidence? Or just Nova? So essentially you did the same thing. You see, we are not required to hold conversations with everyone in the thread.

You just enjoy jumping in the middle of things you don't comprehend. The ad hom was mocking Garud for his use of the term multiple times yesterday without cause.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Of course, to find an example of what SF asked, one need go no farther than the OP of this thread and read SJ's petulant anger over Righties being investigated for breaking the law.

Of course, since it is crystal clear proof provided by another hate-filled Rightie, SF will deny it until doomsday before admitting he was wrong yet again.

That way he can continue to spew the epithets and derision while ignoring the proof you already provided.

Posting a link to the very thread we are on is not citing evidence. Notice he did not provide one quote to support his claim. Not one.

 

[zappasguitar]

LOL... um... did you demand Garud respond with evidence? Or just Nova? So essentially you did the same thing. You see, we are not required to hold conversations with everyone in the thread.

You just enjoy jumping in the middle of things you don't comprehend. The ad hom was mocking Garud for his use of the term multiple times yesterday without cause.

Just as I predicted...

SF's always got an excuse for why it's not his fault when he resorts to schoolyard insults.

Another "personal responsibility" Rightie always so ready and willing to blame others for the words that come from his own mouth.

 

[zappasguitar]

Posting a link to the very thread we are on is not citing evidence. Notice he did not provide one quote to support his claim. Not one.

And here comes the back pedaling...

It is citing evidence. You asked Jarod to prove his claim:

Why do you Republicans seem to believe that Fox News "Reporters" are above the law?

SJ's angry OP rant at the DOJ does indeed suggest he thinks Faux News reporters are above the law...that you don't LIKE the proof provided is irrelevant.

 

[maineman]

So because they disagree that makes them illegitimate? LMAO... does that mean NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC were all illegitimate when Bush was in office?

as I said, I believe that even shows on Faux which purport to be straight news shows, toss in healthy doses of anti-Obama opinion along with their news coverage. I do not believe that MSNBC tosses in a lot of pro-Obama opinion along with the news on THEIR straight news shows, and I don't think that those same news shows were tossing in a lot of anti-Bush opinion when HE was in office either... Imho.

 

[NOVA]

as I said, I believe that even shows on Faux which purport to be straight news shows, toss in healthy doses of anti-Obama opinion along with their news coverage. I do not believe that MSNBC tosses in a lot of pro-Obama opinion along with the news on THEIR straight news shows, and I don't think that those same news shows were tossing in a lot of anti-Bush opinion when HE was in office either... Imho.

Bush and EVERYBODY associated with him was ridiculed 24/7 for most of his presidency, starting soon after 9/11....CNN, HLN, NPR, ABC, NBC and especially on MSNBC....God damn man, your memory can't be short.....I can still remember the mocking he took for his "If your not with us, you're against us" remark.....and it never stopped.

MSNBC interviews lefties about current news issues and never once do they have an opposing view.
Dan Abrams, Contessa Brewer, Christina Brown, Dara Brown, Mika Brzezinski, Willie Geist - are listed as some of their primetime anchors....all very highly partisan.....
Then you have the crazies like http://www.chacha.com/question/who-...me-news-anchors-on-msnbc#sthash.DGeDPkN3.dpufEd Schultz and Chris Matthews and Rachael Maddow.....and who could forget the craziest of all, Olbermann...he was too insane even for them but
it was years until they got rid of him....

wtf mm, don't you think the rest us have TV's or what ?

 

[maineman]

You are conflating news shows with opinion shows. Something I was careful to distinguish between. Why am I not surprised?

 

[Howey]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/21/its_news_not_espionage_118487.html

According to you Eugene Robinson must also think reporters are above the law.

As much as I respect him, Eugene Robinson is a journalist. What do you think he'd say?

Again Garud... WHAT law do you think he broke? You keep saying people think 'Fox reporters are above the law'... WHAT law? What law did he break? If he didn't break a law then how could anyone think he is above the law?

By declaring journalistic immunity, all journalists believe they are above the law.

Funny, I gave up you years ago.

But you can't quit me.

You are conflating news shows with opinion shows. Something I was careful to distinguish between. Why am I not surprised?

Don't be. Fox news shows are opinion shows, which doesn't make them news show. (Think about it)

 

[Howey]

Bush and EVERYBODY associated with him was ridiculed 24/7 for most of his presidency, starting soon after 9/11

What planet do you live on, Bravo? What I remember is overwhelming support of the President immediately following 9/11 from the media, democrats and republicans. I remember him standing by the rubble with the megaphone talking to the people of New York and the nation.

It wasn't until the truth started coming out that the light dimmed.

 

[Jarod]

LOL... suspected of solicitation? Solicitation of information is not equal to bribing you moron. You lied yet again.

Bribing is one way of soliciting top secret information. I'll do "x" for you if you tell me that top secret information.

 

[SJJRSJJS]

There isn't a whole lot of grey in this one. Rosen, a journalist, was named in a search warrant application as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator to violations of the Espionage Act for receiving classified information. It is extraordinarily unlikely that Rosen would be prosecuted as such and that the purpose of naming him as an aider, abettor or co-conspirator was to circumvent restrictions on obtaining journalist work product, but that's what happened. And it's wrong. Very wrong.

Basically, the government is prohibited from gaining access to "search for or seize any work product materials possessed by a person reasonably believed to have a purpose to disseminate to the public a newspaper, book, broadcast, or other similar form of public communication, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce." However, there is an exception to this rule where "there is probable cause to believe that the person possessing such materials has committed or is committing the criminal offense to which the materials relate," which includes the receipt or dissemination of classified material,

So, yes, the government complied with all the legal formalties and didn't do anything "above the law," but the law is fucked and the government shouldn't be naming journalists as aider/abettors/co-conspirtors with leakers, even though they maybe technically are.

Rosen needs to sue the Government and force their hand, and Fox News needs to pay all the legal fees as a matter of Principle.

 

[Jarod]

Rosen needs to sue the Government and force their hand, and Fox News needs to pay all the legal fees as a matter of Principle.

Should he also sue the Judge that granted legal authority?

Even Mitch McConnell says there is not there, there...

 

[SJJRSJJS]

as I said, I believe that even shows on Faux which purport to be straight news shows, toss in healthy doses of anti-Obama opinion along with their news coverage. I do not believe that MSNBC tosses in a lot of pro-Obama opinion along with the news on THEIR straight news shows, and I don't think that those same news shows were tossing in a lot of anti-Bush opinion when HE was in office either... Imho.

You do not you watch Fox New, then how come you can make these "I do/don't believe" insinuations. Your statements here are similar to your statements on my Tiger Woods post where I completely debunked your assertion that a "Good Shot" in golf was not meant to reference the crack of a gun. Golfers say "Good Shot" not good hit. You are not a golfer just like you do not watch Fox News, butt you try to assert that you played golf and hit good golf hits, not "Golf Shots", and now you know all about Fox News. You are a sham poster who will change any narrative on this Forum to promote radical Socialist ideas. I "defeeted" you on my Tiger Woods post and I have beaten your culo again here.......Mensa rules!!!

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Just as I predicted...

SF's always got an excuse for why it's not his fault when he resorts to schoolyard insults.

Another "personal responsibility" Rightie always so ready and willing to blame others for the words that come from his own mouth.

just as I thought, you can't admit to your own hypocrisy.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Bribing is one way of soliciting top secret information. I'll do "x" for you if you tell me that top secret information.

True, a bribe is a FORM of solicitation. But solicitation is not necessarily a bribe. So you are incorrect to use that term unless you have evidence that says it was indeed a bribe.